Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
To evaluate the linguistic and psychometric properties of the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC) in assessing the quality of life of Chinese cancer patients.
The English FLIC was translated into Traditional Chinese by the standard forward–backward procedure. After cognitive debriefing, a Traditional Chinese FLIC was administered to 500 cancer patients in a major public hospital in Hong Kong. Of which, 200 were invited to complete the questionnaire in 2 weeks. To identify a scale structure appropriate to Chinese, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed on two randomly split halves of the sample.
We identified five scales of the Traditional Chinese FLIC which assess the physical, psychological, hardship, nausea and social aspects. These five scales and the overall scale demonstrated satisfactory fit and had the alpha coefficient ranged from 0.68 to 0.92. The intra-class correlation coefficient ranged from 0.67 to 0.88. In addition, all FLIC scales were negatively associated with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and, also except for the psychological scale, had lower scores in patients who were treated by chemotherapy.
The Traditional Chinese FLIC is an appropriate health indicator for Chinese cancer patients.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Johnson, J. R., & Temple, R. (1985). Food and Drug Administration requirements for approval of new anticancer drugs. Cancer Treatment Reports, 69(10), 1155–1159. PubMed
Schipper, H., Clinch, J., McMurray, A., & Levitt, M. (1984). Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: The Functional Living Index-Cancer: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2(5), 472–483. PubMed
Goh, C. R., Lee, K. S., Tan, T. C., Wang, T. L., Tan, C. H., Wong, J., et al. (1996). Measuring quality of life in different cultures: Translation of the Functional Living Index for Cancer (FLIC) into Chinese and Malay in Singapore. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 25(3), 323–334.
Ruckdeschel, J. C., & Piantadosi, S. (1994). Quality of life in lung cancer surgical adjuvant trials. Chest, 106(6 Suppl), 324S–328S. PubMed
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. CrossRef
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. CrossRef
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2d ed., McGraw-Hill series in psychology). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schipper, H., & Levitt, M. (1985). Measuring quality of life: Risks and benefits. Cancer Treatment Reports, 69(10), 1115–1125. PubMed
Cheung, Y. B., Ng, G. Y., Wong, L. C., Koo, W. H., Tan, E. H., Tay, M. H., et al. (2003). Measuring quality of life in Chinese cancer patients: A new version of the Functional Living Index for Cancer (Chinese). Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 32(3), 376–380.
- The Functional Living Index-Cancer is a reliable and valid instrument in Chinese cancer patients
Daniel Y. T. Fong
Alvina H. K. Lee
Stewart Y. Tung
Janet Y. H. Wong
Y. M. Chan
Cynthia R. Goh
Y. B. Cheung
- Springer International Publishing