Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 1/2021

18-08-2020

The Efficacy of Intolerance of Uncertainty Intervention on Anxiety and its Mediating Role by Multilayer Linear Model Analysis

Auteurs: Ji Li, Jinfan Gao, Qin Zhang, Chieh Li, Lixia Cui

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 1/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Cognitive bias modification-interpretation (CBM-I) is a promising treatment modality for emotional disorders. But the moderate effect sizes emphasize the need to explore the potential mechanism of the CBM-I. Recent research has identified intolerance of uncertainty (IU) as a possible a trans-diagnostic risk and maintaining factor emotional disorders. The current study investigated the impact of a four-session IU-focused CBM-I on reduction of anxiety and determined whether IU mediated the relationship between IU interpretation bias and anxiety. 40 participants selected based on a high IU interpretation bias (IU-IB) were randomly assigned to an active (IU CBM-I) condition and a control CBM-I condition. By longitudinal design, anxiety and uncertainty questionnaires were administered before, after and one month after the intervention. Multilayer linear model analysis indicated that the active IU CBM-I was significantly associated with changes in anxiety from pre-to-post intervention as well as reductions in IU at post-intervention and month-one follow-up. The results also found that IU mediated the relationship between IU interpretation bias and anxiety.

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijf je als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen jouw vak. Met het online abonnement heb je toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kun je op je gemak en wanneer het jou het beste uitkomt verdiepen in jouw vakgebied.

Voetnoten
1
We also conducted a sensitivity analysis that includes all randomized subjects and the pattern of findings was consistent with those reported for the completer sample.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Beard, C., & Amir, N. (2008). A multi-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretation and social anxiety symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46(10), 1135–1141. CrossRef Beard, C., & Amir, N. (2008). A multi-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretation and social anxiety symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46(10), 1135–1141. CrossRef
go back to reference Beck, A. T., & Clark, D. A. (1997). An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(1), 49–58. CrossRef Beck, A. T., & Clark, D. A. (1997). An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(1), 49–58. CrossRef
go back to reference Brosan, L., Hoppitt, L., Shelfer, L., Sillence, A., & Mackintosh, B. (2011). Cognitive bias modification for attention and interpretation reduces trait and state anxiety in anxious patients referred to an out-patient service: Results from a pilot study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42(3), 258–264. CrossRef Brosan, L., Hoppitt, L., Shelfer, L., Sillence, A., & Mackintosh, B. (2011). Cognitive bias modification for attention and interpretation reduces trait and state anxiety in anxious patients referred to an out-patient service: Results from a pilot study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42(3), 258–264. CrossRef
go back to reference Buhr, K., & Dugas, M. J. (2002). The intolerance of uncertainty scale: Psychometric properties of the english version. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 931–945. CrossRef Buhr, K., & Dugas, M. J. (2002). The intolerance of uncertainty scale: Psychometric properties of the english version. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 931–945. CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Vol. 2). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Vol. 2). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference Cristea, I. A., Kok, R. N., & Cuijpers, P. (2015). Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 206(1), 7–16. CrossRef Cristea, I. A., Kok, R. N., & Cuijpers, P. (2015). Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 206(1), 7–16. CrossRef
go back to reference Dugas, M. J., Brillon, P., Savard, P., Turcotte, J., Gaudet, A., & Ladoucuer, R. (2010). A randomized clinical trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy and applied relaxation for adults with generalized anxiety disorder. Behavior Therapy, 41, 46–58. CrossRef Dugas, M. J., Brillon, P., Savard, P., Turcotte, J., Gaudet, A., & Ladoucuer, R. (2010). A randomized clinical trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy and applied relaxation for adults with generalized anxiety disorder. Behavior Therapy, 41, 46–58. CrossRef
go back to reference Giannini, M., & Loscalzo, Y. (2016). Social anxiety and adolescence: Interpretation bias in an italian sample. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 65–72. CrossRef Giannini, M., & Loscalzo, Y. (2016). Social anxiety and adolescence: Interpretation bias in an italian sample. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 65–72. CrossRef
go back to reference Hirsch, C. R., Meeten, F., Krahe, C., & Reeder, C. (2016). Resolving ambiguity in emotional disorders: The nature and role of interpretation biases. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12(1), 281–305. CrossRef Hirsch, C. R., Meeten, F., Krahe, C., & Reeder, C. (2016). Resolving ambiguity in emotional disorders: The nature and role of interpretation biases. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12(1), 281–305. CrossRef
go back to reference Koerner, N., & Dugas, M. J. (2006).  A Cognitive Model of Generalized Anxiety Disorder: the Role of Intolerance of Uncertainty. Worry and its Psychological Disorders: Theory, Assessment and Treatment. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Koerner, N., & Dugas, M. J. (2006).  A Cognitive Model of Generalized Anxiety Disorder: the Role of Intolerance of Uncertainty. Worry and its Psychological Disorders: Theory, Assessment and Treatment. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
go back to reference Krebs, G., Pile, V., Grant, S. (2017). Research review: cognitive bias modification of interpretations in youth and its effect on anxiety: a meta-analysis.  Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry. Krebs, G., Pile, V., Grant, S. (2017). Research review: cognitive bias modification of interpretations in youth and its effect on anxiety: a meta-analysis.  Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry.
go back to reference Li, W., & Qian, M. (1995). Revision of the state-trait anxiety inventory with sample of chinese college students. Actacentiarum Naturalum Universitis Pekinesis, 1, 108–112. Li, W., & Qian, M. (1995). Revision of the state-trait anxiety inventory with sample of chinese college students. Actacentiarum Naturalum Universitis Pekinesis, 1, 108–112.
go back to reference Macleod, C., & Mathews, A. (2012). Cognitive bias modification approaches to anxiety. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8(1), 189–217. CrossRef Macleod, C., & Mathews, A. (2012). Cognitive bias modification approaches to anxiety. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8(1), 189–217. CrossRef
go back to reference Oglesby, M. E., Allan, N. P., & Schmidt, N. B. (2017). Randomized control trial investigating the efficacy of a computer-based intolerance of uncertainty intervention. Behav Res Ther, 95, 50–57. Oglesby, M. E., Allan, N. P., & Schmidt, N. B. (2017). Randomized control trial investigating the efficacy of a computer-based intolerance of uncertainty intervention. Behav Res Ther, 95, 50–57.
go back to reference Spielberger, C. D. (1970). STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Self-Evaluation Questionnaire, 1–24. Spielberger, C. D. (1970). STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Self-Evaluation Questionnaire, 1–24.
go back to reference Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
go back to reference Stevens, E. S., Behar, E., & Jendrusina, A. A. (2018). Enhancing the efficacy of cognitive bias modification for social anxiety. Behavior Therapy, S000578941830025X. Stevens, E. S., Behar, E., & Jendrusina, A. A. (2018). Enhancing the efficacy of cognitive bias modification for social anxiety. Behavior Therapy, S000578941830025X.
go back to reference Wilson, J. K., & Rapee, R. M. (2005). Interpretative biases in social phobia: Content specificity and the effects of depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29(3), 315–331. CrossRef Wilson, J. K., & Rapee, R. M. (2005). Interpretative biases in social phobia: Content specificity and the effects of depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29(3), 315–331. CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The Efficacy of Intolerance of Uncertainty Intervention on Anxiety and its Mediating Role by Multilayer Linear Model Analysis
Auteurs
Ji Li
Jinfan Gao
Qin Zhang
Chieh Li
Lixia Cui
Publicatiedatum
18-08-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09832-5