Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 7/2019

11-02-2019 | Review

The effect of nature exposure on the mental health of patients: a systematic review

Auteurs: C. H. Trøstrup, A. B. Christiansen, K. S. Stølen, P. K. Nielsen, R. Stelter

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Background

The effect of nature-based interventions on self-reported mental well-being in patients with physical disease is gaining increasing attention. However, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials investigating this area. Due to the massive costs in health care systems, there is a need for new strategies to address these issues and an urgent need for attention to this field. Nature-based interventions are low cost, easy to implement, and should get attention within the health care field. Therefore, the objective was to find the impact of nature interventions on mental well-being in humans with a physical disease.

Methods

In four major databases (PubMed, Cinahl, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library), a systematic review of quantitative studies of nature’s impact on self-reported mental health in patients with physical disease was performed. A total of 1909 articles were retrieved but only five met the inclusion criteria and were summarized.

Results

All five studies were quantitative, with a control group and a nature-based intervention. A source of heterogeneity was identified: the patients in one of the five studies were psychosomatic. In the four studies with somatic patients, significant benefit of nature on self-reported mental health outcomes was found; the only study that failed to show a significant benefit was the one with psychosomatic patients.

Conclusion

A significant effect of nature on mental well-being of patients with somatic disease was found. The result in patients with psychosomatic disease is inconclusive, and more studies in this category are needed. Further research on the effect of nature on mental health is merited, with special attention to standardizing intervention type and dose as well as outcome measures within each medical discipline.
Literatuur
2.
go back to reference Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 169–182.CrossRef Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 169–182.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nilsson, K. (Ed.). (2011). Forests, trees, and human health. New York: Springer. Nilsson, K. (Ed.). (2011). Forests, trees, and human health. New York: Springer.
8.
go back to reference Bragg, R., & Atkins, G. (2016). A review of nature-based interventions for mental health care. London: Natural England. Bragg, R., & Atkins, G. (2016). A review of nature-based interventions for mental health care. London: Natural England.
10.
go back to reference World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, & University of Melbourne. (2004). Promoting mental health: concepts, emerging evidence, practice: summary report. Geneva: World Health Organization. World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, & University of Melbourne. (2004). Promoting mental health: concepts, emerging evidence, practice: summary report. Geneva: World Health Organization.
14.
go back to reference Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (n.d.). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (n.d.). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement.
16.
go back to reference Zakowski, L., Seibert, C., & VanEyck, S. (2004). Evidence-based medicine: Answering questions of diagnosis. Clinical Medicine & Research, 2(1), 63–69.CrossRef Zakowski, L., Seibert, C., & VanEyck, S. (2004). Evidence-based medicine: Answering questions of diagnosis. Clinical Medicine & Research, 2(1), 63–69.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cimprich, B., & Ronis, D. L. (2003). An environmental intervention to restore attention in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer Nursing, 26(4), 284–292 (Quiz 293–294).CrossRefPubMed Cimprich, B., & Ronis, D. L. (2003). An environmental intervention to restore attention in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer Nursing, 26(4), 284–292 (Quiz 293–294).CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hitzig, S. L., Alton, C., Leong, N., & Gatt, K. (2012). The Evolution and evaluation of a therapeutic recreation cottage program for persons with spinal cord injury. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 46(3), 218–233. Hitzig, S. L., Alton, C., Leong, N., & Gatt, K. (2012). The Evolution and evaluation of a therapeutic recreation cottage program for persons with spinal cord injury. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 46(3), 218–233.
23.
go back to reference Rosenberg, R. S., Lange, W., Zebrack, B., Moulton, S., & Kosslyn, S. (2014). An outdoor adventure program for young adults with cancer: Positive effects on body image and psychosocial functioning. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 32(5), 622–636.CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg, R. S., Lange, W., Zebrack, B., Moulton, S., & Kosslyn, S. (2014). An outdoor adventure program for young adults with cancer: Positive effects on body image and psychosocial functioning. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 32(5), 622–636.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference WHO. (2002). Mental health: new understanding, new hope (repr.). Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO. (2002). Mental health: new understanding, new hope (repr.). Geneva: World Health Organization.
30.
go back to reference Thompson Coon, J., Boddy, K., Stein, K., Whear, R., Barton, J., & Depledge, M. H. (2011). Does participating in physical activity in outdoor natural environments have a greater effect on physical and mental wellbeing than physical activity indoors? A systematic review. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(5), 1761–1772. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102947t.CrossRef Thompson Coon, J., Boddy, K., Stein, K., Whear, R., Barton, J., & Depledge, M. H. (2011). Does participating in physical activity in outdoor natural environments have a greater effect on physical and mental wellbeing than physical activity indoors? A systematic review. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(5), 1761–1772. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1021/​es102947t.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The effect of nature exposure on the mental health of patients: a systematic review
Auteurs
C. H. Trøstrup
A. B. Christiansen
K. S. Stølen
P. K. Nielsen
R. Stelter
Publicatiedatum
11-02-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02125-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2019

Quality of Life Research 7/2019 Naar de uitgave