Top

Gepubliceerd in:

05-01-2018 | Original Article

The effect of height and shoulder-to-hip ratio on interpersonal space in virtual environment

Auteurs: Farid Pazhoohi, Carlos Silva, João Lamas, Sandra Mouta, Jorge Santos, Joana Arantes

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2019

Abstract

Previous research has associated men’s physical features such as height and Shoulder-to-Hip Ratio (SHR) with dominance. Proxemics literature has suggested that the interpersonal space (comfort distance) increases in threatening and uncomfortable situations and decreases in unthreatening and comfortable situations. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the effect of different heights and SHRs on comfortable interpersonal distance by systematic manipulation of virtual confederates bodily features. More specifically, participants determined their comfort distances from virtual male confederates with different heights and SHRs in a virtual environment. We hypothesized that a virtual confederate’s height and SHR influences the perception of interpersonal dominance; and consequently interpersonal space increases for taller and broader confederates as a result of increased interpersonal dominance. Results showed that comfortable interpersonal distance was positively associated with height for male participants, but not for female participants. No effect was found for shoulder width, neither for male nor female participants. Results were discussed in terms of the importance of height as a signal of dominance and fighting ability.

vorige artikel Individual differences in emotion processing: how similar are diffusion model parameters across tasks?

volgende artikel Experimental validation of the diffusion model based on a slow response time paradigm

Archer, J., & Thanzami, V. (2007). The relation between physical aggression, size and strength, among a sample of young Indian men. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.01.005.CrossRef

Archer, J., & Thanzami, V. (2009). The relation between mate value, entitlement, physical aggression, size and strength among a sample of young Indian men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(5), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.003.CrossRef

Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (2003). Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(7), 819–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029007002.CrossRefPubMed

Batres, C., Re, D. E., & Perrett, D. I. (2015). Influence of perceived height, masculinity, and age on each other and on perceptions of dominance in male faces. Perception, 44(11), 1293–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006615596898.

Blaker, N. M., & van Vugt, M. (2014). The status-size hypothesis: How cues of physical size and social status influence each other. In J. T. Cheng, J. L. Tracy & C. Anderson (Eds.), The Psychology of Social Status (pp. 119–137). New York:Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0867-7_6.

Blascovich, J. (2002). Social influence within immersive virtual environments. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars (pp. 127–145). London: Springer.

Bombari, D., Mast, M. S., Canadas, E., & Bachmann, M. (2015). Studying social interactions through immersive virtual environment technology: virtues, pitfalls, and future challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 869. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00869.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Braun, M. F., & Bryan, A. (2006). Female waist-to-hip and male waist-to-shoulder ratios as determinants of romantic partner desirability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(5), 806–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407506068264.CrossRef

Coello, Y., Bourgeois, J., & Iachini, T. (2012). Embodied perception of reachable space: how do we manage threatening objects? Cognitive Processing, 13(S1), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0470-z.CrossRef

Dijkstra, P., & Buunk, B. P. (2001). Sex differences in the jealousy-evoking nature of a rival’s body build. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(5), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00070-8.CrossRef

Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Bishop, P. J., & Parish, A. (2010). Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: A New Zealand–U.S. comparative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 798–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9441-y.CrossRefPubMed

Duguid, M. M., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). Living large the powerful overestimate their own height. Psychological Science, 23(1), 36–40.CrossRef

Ellis, L. (1994). The high and the mighty among man and beast: How universal is the relationship between height (or body size) and social status. In L. Ellis (Ed.), Social Stratification and Socioeconomic Inequality, Vol. 2 (pp. 93–112). Westport: Praeger.

Felipe, N. J., & Sommer, R. (1966). Invasions of Personal Space. Social Problems, 14(2), 206–214. https://doi.org/10.2307/798618.CrossRef

Fessler, D. M., Holbrook, C., & Snyder, J. K. (2012). Weapons make the man (larger): Formidability is represented as size and strength in humans. PloS ONE, 7(4), e32751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032751.CrossRef

Frederick, D. A., & Haselton, M. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1167–1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207303022.CrossRef

Freeman, D., Evans, N., Lister, R., Antley, A., Dunn, G., & Slater, M. (2014). Height, social comparison, and paranoia: An immersive virtual reality experimental study. Psychiatry Research, 218(3), 348–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gallup, A. C., White, D. D., & Gallup, G. G. (2007). Handgrip strength predicts sexual behavior, body morphology, and aggression in male college students. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(6), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.07.001.CrossRef

Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.

Hammes, J. A. (1964). The personal distance effect as a function of esthetic stimulus, anxiety and sex. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20(3), 353–354.CrossRef

Hill, A. K., Hunt, J., Welling, L. L. M., Cárdenas, R. A., Rotella, M. A., Wheatley, J. R., Dawood, K., Shriver, M., & Puts, D. A. (2013). Quantifying the strength and form of sexual selection on men’s traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(5), 334–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.05.004.CrossRef

Horvath, T. (1981). Physical attractiveness: The influence of selected torso parameters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 10(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542671.CrossRefPubMed

Hughes, S. M., Dispenza, F., & Gallup, G. G. (2004). Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(5), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.06.001.CrossRef

Hughes, S. M., & Gallup, G. G. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00149-6.CrossRef

Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., Senese, V. P., Galante, F., & Ruggiero, G. (2016). Peripersonal and interpersonal space in virtual and real environments: Effects of gender and age. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.004.CrossRef

Iachini, T., Ruggiero, G., Ruotolo, F., & Vinciguerra, M. (2014). Motor resources in peripersonal space are intrinsic to spatial encoding: Evidence from motor interference. Acta Psychologica, 153, 20–27.CrossRef

Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.428.CrossRefPubMed

Kennedy, D. P., Gläscher, J., Tyszka, J. M., & Adolphs, R. (2009). Personal space regulation by the human amygdala. Nature Neuroscience, 12(10), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2381.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kurzban, R., & Weeden, J. (2005). HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.012.CrossRef

Lechelt, E. C. (1975). Occupational affiliation and ratings of physical height and personal esteem. Psychological Reports, 36(3), 943–946. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1975.36.3.943.CrossRefPubMed

Maisey, D., Vale, E., Cornelissen, P., & Tovée, M. (1999). Characteristics of male attractiveness for women. The Lancet, 353(9163), 1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00438-9.CrossRef

Massar, K., & Buunk, A. P. (2009). Rivals in the mind’s eye: Jealous responses after subliminal exposure to body shapes. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.016.CrossRef

McElligott, A. G., Gammell, M. P., Harty, H. C., Paini, D. R., Murphy, D. T., Walsh, J. T., & Hayden, T. J. (2001). Sexual size dimorphism in fallow deer (Dama dama): Do larger, heavier males gain greater mating success? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49(4), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650000293.CrossRef

Melamed, T. (1992). Personality correlates of physical height. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(12), 1349–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90179-S.CrossRef

Parker, G. A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47(1), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(74)90111-8.

Pawłowski, B. (2003). Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in height as a strategy for increasing the pool of potential partners in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270(1516), 709–712. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2294.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pazhoohi, F., Hosseinchari, M., & Doyle, J. F. (2012). Iranian men’s waist-to-hip ratios, shoulder-to-hip ratios, body esteem and self-efficacy. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 10(2), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.10.2012.2.2.CrossRef

Quesque, F., Ruggiero, G., Mouta, S., Santos, J., Iachini, T., & Coello, Y. (2017). Keeping you at arm’s length: Modifying peripersonal space influences interpersonal distance. Psychological Research, 81(4),709–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0782-1.CrossRefPubMed

Rashidi, M., Keshtkaran, K., Zabihidan, S., Hosseinchari, M., & Pazhoohi, F. (2012). Effect of different professions’ clothing on children’s height perception. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 1038–1042. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n3.39394.CrossRefPubMed

Ruggiero, G., Frassinetti, F., Coello, Y., Rapuano, M., di Cola, A. S., & Iachini, T. (2017). The effect of facial expressions on peripersonal and interpersonal spaces. Psychological Research, 81(6), 1232–1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0806-x.CrossRefPubMed

Schuett, G. W. (1997). Body size and agonistic experience affect dominance and mating success in male copperheads. Animal Behaviour, 54(1), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0417.CrossRefPubMed

Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276(1656), 575–584.CrossRef

Smith, G. H. (1953). Size-distance judgments of human faces (projected images). The Journal of General Psychology, 49(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1953.9710677.CrossRef

Sorokowski, P. (2010). Politicians’ estimated height as an indicator of their popularity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1302–1309. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.710.CrossRef

Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., Verhulst, S., & Pollet, T. V. (2013). Tall claims? Sense and nonsense about the importance of height of US presidents. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.002.CrossRef

Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., Verhulst, S., & Pollet, T. V. (2015). Human height is positively related to interpersonal dominance in dyadic interactions. PloS ONE, 10(2), e0117860. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117860. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sundstrom, E., & Altman, I. (1976). Interpersonal relationships and personal space: Research review and theoretical model. Human Ecology, 4(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531456.CrossRef

Taffou, M., & Viaud-Delmon, I. (2014). Cynophobic fear adaptively extends peri-personal space. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 5, 122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Thomsen, L., Frankenhuis, W. E., Ingold-Smith, M., & Carey, S. (2011). Big and mighty: Preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance. Science, 331(6016), 477–480. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199198.CrossRefPubMed

Watkins, C. D., Fraccaro, P. J., Smith, F. G., Vukovic, J., Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2010). Taller men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men. Behavioral Ecology, 21(5), 943–947. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq091.CrossRef

Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x.CrossRef

Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., & Ducheneaut, N. (2009). The proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Communication Research, 36(2), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208330254.CrossRef

Titel: The effect of height and shoulder-to-hip ratio on interpersonal space in virtual environment
Auteurs: Farid Pazhoohi
Carlos Silva
João Lamas
Sandra Mouta
Jorge Santos
Joana Arantes
Publicatiedatum: 05-01-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0968-1

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2019

Eye blinks are related to auditory information processing: evidence from a complex speech perception task

Cognitive functioning: is it all or none?

Gender differences in SCRABBLE performance and associated engagement in purposeful practice activities

The role of head and hand movements for infants’ predictions of others’ actions

Binaural auditory beats affect long-term memory

Is working memory training in older adults sensitive to music?