Background
Gait has been generally viewed as a largely automated motor task, requiring minimal higher-level cognitive input. Increasing evidence, however, suggest that attention demanding cognitive tasks to disturb gait[
1,
2]. Movement variability may influence joint stability and increase the risk of “giving way” at the ankle in individuals with functional ankle instability (FAI)[
3]. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of dual-tasking on ankle movement variability in athletes with FAI.
Methods
21 athletes (age 25.57±4.77 years) with clinically diagnosed FAI were recruited. All participants completed 5 trials of normal walking and 5 trials of normal walking while performing a cognitive task. The cognitive task consisted of subtracting seven from a randomly selected number between 11 and 99 repeatedly whilst walking. Three dimensional rotations of the affected ankle (measured by an eight-camera motion capture system at 100 Hz) were calculated by visual3D during gait cycles. Between trials variability of ankle rotations time curves during stance phase and during 200ms before and after heel strike were calculated using the coefficient of multiple correlations (CMC) and intraclass correlation (ICC)
Results
The results indicate that mean CMC was decreased during dual task condition in the sagittal and frontal planes. This was statistically significant in frontal plane during 200ms before and after heel strike (p<0.05) (Table
1). There was reduction in ICC magnitude in dual-task condition compared to single task in 200ms before heel strike (Table
2).
Table 1
Mean CMC during different conditions and periods of time.
200ms before and after HSa | Frontal plane | 0.9529±0.029 | 0.9270±0.044 * |
| Sagittal plane | 0.9505±0.042 | 0.9373±0.046 |
| Transverse plane | 0.8530±0.150 | 0.8539±0.140 |
HS-TOb | Frontal plane | 0.9396±0.042 | 0.91150.092 |
| Sagittal plane | 0.9842±0.019 | 0.9825±0.022 |
| Transverse plane | 0.9228±0.092 | 0.9274±0.072 |
Table 2
ICC in 3planes during different conditions
200ms before HS a | Frontal plane | 0.964 | 0.960 |
| Sagittal plane | 0.943 | 0.710 |
| Transverse plane | 0.934 | 0.914 |
HS | Frontal plane | 0.968 | 0.975 |
| Sagittal plane | 0.879 | 0.907 |
| Transverse plane | 0.756 | 0.908 |
200ms after HS | Frontal plane | 0.958 | 0.909 |
| Sagittal plane | 0.950 | 0.949 |
| Transverse plane | 0.809 | 0.973 |
TO b | Frontal plane | 0.911 | 0.930 |
| Sagittal plane | 0.882 | 0.898 |
| Transverse plane | 0.924 | 0.903 |
Conclusion
The athletes with FAI demonstrated greater ankle movement variability during dual task condition which may indicate diminished neuromotor control. Cognitive load may increase episodes of ankle instability in these athletes.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Competing interests
Nester declares a personal commercial interest in the insoles tested in this study.