Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 5/2008

01-06-2008

The disutility of chronic gout

Auteurs: Dinesh Khanna, Mansoor Ahmed, Dustin Yontz, Shaari S. Ginsburg, Grace S. Park, Anthony Leonard, Joel Tsevat

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 5/2008

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Introduction

Gout is a chronic painful inflammatory arthritis. Data regarding the impact of gout on health-related quality of life, however, are limited.

Methods

We interviewed patients with chronic stable gout. Health status was measured by using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) and physical component summary (MCS) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Direct preference-based measures included a health rating scale (RS), the time tradeoff (TTO), and standard gamble (SG) for one’s current health state with gout and current health state without gout; indirect preference-based measures included the SF-6D and the EQ-5D. Disutilities for gout were assessed by subtracting preference scores for current health states with gout from those for current health without gout and were compared between patients ranking gout as their top health concern versus the rest of the patients.

Results

Of the 80 interviewees, 72 (90%) were male, 55 (69%) were Caucasian, and the mean (SD) age was 60 (11) years. The mean SF-36 PCS and MCS scores were 38.9 and 48.6, respectively. The mean (SD) SF-6D score was 0.68 (0.13) and the mean (SD) EQ-5D score was 0.73 (0.23). The mean (SD) RS disutility for gout was 0.05 (0.12), the mean TTO disutility was 0.03 (0.12), and the mean SG disutility was 0.02 (0.11). The RS disutilities of subject patients who ranked gout as their top concern (n = 17) trended towards being statistically significantly larger than those of the remaining patients, P = 0.06 but their TTO and SG disutilities were similar to those of the remaining patients.

Conclusion

Although physical functioning of patients with gout is often compromised, patients with chronic stable gout do not assign a large disutility to gout per se. Still, patients who rank their gout as their top health concern tend to assign greater RS disutility to gout than do other patients.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
Accessed www.​drugstore.​com (Internet Communication).
 
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Saag, K. G., & Choi, H. (2006). Epidemiology, risk factors, and lifestyle modifications for gout. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 8(Suppl 1), S2.CrossRef Saag, K. G., & Choi, H. (2006). Epidemiology, risk factors, and lifestyle modifications for gout. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 8(Suppl 1), S2.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Terkeltaub, R. A. (2003). Clinical practice. Gout. The New England Journal of Medicine, 349(17), 1647–1655.PubMedCrossRef Terkeltaub, R. A. (2003). Clinical practice. Gout. The New England Journal of Medicine, 349(17), 1647–1655.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Roddy, E., Zhang, W., & Doherty, M. (2007). Is gout associated with reduced quality of life? A case–control study. Rheumatology (Oxford), 46(9), 1441–1444.CrossRef Roddy, E., Zhang, W., & Doherty, M. (2007). Is gout associated with reduced quality of life? A case–control study. Rheumatology (Oxford), 46(9), 1441–1444.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ware, J. E. Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.PubMedCrossRef Ware, J. E. Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Khanna, D., & Tsevat, J. (2007). Health-related quality of life—an introduction. The American Journal of Managed Care, 13(Suppl 9), S218–S223.PubMed Khanna, D., & Tsevat, J. (2007). Health-related quality of life—an introduction. The American Journal of Managed Care, 13(Suppl 9), S218–S223.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kopec, J. A., & Willison, K. D. (2003). A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(4), 317–325.PubMedCrossRef Kopec, J. A., & Willison, K. D. (2003). A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(4), 317–325.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ware, J. E. J., Kosinki, M., & Keller, S. (1994). SF-36 Physical and mental health summary scales: A user’s manual. Boston, Mass: Health Institute, New England Medical Center. Ware, J. E. J., Kosinki, M., & Keller, S. (1994). SF-36 Physical and mental health summary scales: A user’s manual. Boston, Mass: Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
8.
go back to reference Fries, J. F., Spitz, P., Kraines, R. G., & Holman, H. R. (1980). Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 23(2), 137–145.PubMedCrossRef Fries, J. F., Spitz, P., Kraines, R. G., & Holman, H. R. (1980). Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 23(2), 137–145.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Torrance, G. (1986). Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. Journal of Health Economics, 5, 1–30.PubMedCrossRef Torrance, G. (1986). Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. Journal of Health Economics, 5, 1–30.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1953). Theory of games and economic behavior. New York: Wiley. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1953). Theory of games and economic behavior. New York: Wiley.
11.
go back to reference Froberg, D. G., & Kane, R. L. (1989). Methodology for measuring health-state preferences–II: Scaling methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42(5), 459–471.PubMedCrossRef Froberg, D. G., & Kane, R. L. (1989). Methodology for measuring health-state preferences–II: Scaling methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42(5), 459–471.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Brazier, J., Usherwood, T., Harper, R., & Thomas, K. (1998). Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1115–1128.PubMedCrossRef Brazier, J., Usherwood, T., Harper, R., & Thomas, K. (1998). Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1115–1128.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference The EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16(3):199–208. The EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16(3):199–208.
14.
go back to reference Hirsch, J., Lee, S., Terkeltaub, R., Khanna, D., Singh, J., Sarkin, A., et al. (2006). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of a gout-specific patient reported outcomes (PRO) instrument. Arthritis Rheumatism, 54(9), S102 (Abstract). Hirsch, J., Lee, S., Terkeltaub, R., Khanna, D., Singh, J., Sarkin, A., et al. (2006). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of a gout-specific patient reported outcomes (PRO) instrument. Arthritis Rheumatism, 54(9), S102 (Abstract).
15.
go back to reference Wallace, S. L., Robinson, H., Masi, A. T., Decker, J. L., McCarty, D. J., & Yu, T. F. (1977). Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. Arthritis Rheumatism, 20(3), 895–900.PubMedCrossRef Wallace, S. L., Robinson, H., Masi, A. T., Decker, J. L., McCarty, D. J., & Yu, T. F. (1977). Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. Arthritis Rheumatism, 20(3), 895–900.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ware, J., Kosinski, M., & Dewey, J. (2000). How to score version two of the SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated. Ware, J., Kosinski, M., & Dewey, J. (2000). How to score version two of the SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.
17.
go back to reference UMaker user’s manual (1999). UMDNJ technical report. UMaker user’s manual (1999). UMDNJ technical report.
18.
go back to reference Arias, E. (2004). United States life tables, 2002. National Vital Statistics Reports, 53(6), 1–38.PubMed Arias, E. (2004). United States life tables, 2002. National Vital Statistics Reports, 53(6), 1–38.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Stalmeier, P. F., Goldstein, M. K., Holmes, A. M., Lenert, L., Miyamoto, J., Stiggelbout, A. M., et al. (2001). What should be reported in a methods section on utility assessment? Medical Decision Making, 21(3), 200–207.PubMedCrossRef Stalmeier, P. F., Goldstein, M. K., Holmes, A. M., Lenert, L., Miyamoto, J., Stiggelbout, A. M., et al. (2001). What should be reported in a methods section on utility assessment? Medical Decision Making, 21(3), 200–207.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Torrance, G. W. (1987). Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(6), 593–603.PubMedCrossRef Torrance, G. W. (1987). Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(6), 593–603.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Brazier, J., Usherwood, T., Harper, R., & Thomas, K. (1998). Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1115–1128.PubMedCrossRef Brazier, J., Usherwood, T., Harper, R., & Thomas, K. (1998). Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1115–1128.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–92.PubMedCrossRef Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–92.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Shaw, J. W., Johnson, J. A., & Coons, S. J. (2005). US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: Development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Medical Care, 43(3), 203–220.PubMedCrossRef Shaw, J. W., Johnson, J. A., & Coons, S. J. (2005). US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: Development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Medical Care, 43(3), 203–220.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Colton, T. (1974), Statistics in medicine. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. Colton, T. (1974), Statistics in medicine. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
25.
go back to reference Spencer, A. (2004). The implications of linking questions within the SG and TTO methods. Health Economics, 13(8), 807–818.PubMedCrossRef Spencer, A. (2004). The implications of linking questions within the SG and TTO methods. Health Economics, 13(8), 807–818.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Stalmeier, P. F. (2002). Discrepancies between chained and classic utilities induced by anchoring with occasional adjustments. Medical Decision Making, 22(1), 53–64.PubMedCrossRef Stalmeier, P. F. (2002). Discrepancies between chained and classic utilities induced by anchoring with occasional adjustments. Medical Decision Making, 22(1), 53–64.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hanmer, J., Lawrence, W. F., Anderson, J. P., Kaplan, R. M., & Fryback, D. G. (2006). Report of nationally representative values for the noninstitutionalized US adult population for 7 health-related quality-of-life scores. Medical Decision Making, 26(4), 391–400.PubMedCrossRef Hanmer, J., Lawrence, W. F., Anderson, J. P., Kaplan, R. M., & Fryback, D. G. (2006). Report of nationally representative values for the noninstitutionalized US adult population for 7 health-related quality-of-life scores. Medical Decision Making, 26(4), 391–400.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Marra, C. A., Esdaile, J. M., Guh, D., Kopec, J. A., Brazier, J. E., Koehler, B. E., et al. (2004). A comparison of four indirect methods of assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis. Medical Care, 42(11), 1125–1131.PubMedCrossRef Marra, C. A., Esdaile, J. M., Guh, D., Kopec, J. A., Brazier, J. E., Koehler, B. E., et al. (2004). A comparison of four indirect methods of assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis. Medical Care, 42(11), 1125–1131.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bharmal, M., & Thomas, J. III (2006). Comparing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D descriptive systems to assess their ceiling effects in the US general population. Value Health, 9(4), 262–71.PubMedCrossRef Bharmal, M., & Thomas, J. III (2006). Comparing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D descriptive systems to assess their ceiling effects in the US general population. Value Health, 9(4), 262–71.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hays, R. D. (2005). Reliability and validity (including responsiveness). In P. Fayers & R. D. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials (2nd ed., pp. 25–39). New York: Oxford. Hays, R. D. (2005). Reliability and validity (including responsiveness). In P. Fayers & R. D. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials (2nd ed., pp. 25–39). New York: Oxford.
31.
go back to reference Khanna, D., Ahmed, M., Yontz, D., Ginsburg, S. S., & Tsevat, J. Willingness to pay for a cure in patients with chronic gout. Medical Decision Making 2008. Mar 18; [Epub ahead of print]. Khanna, D., Ahmed, M., Yontz, D., Ginsburg, S. S., & Tsevat, J. Willingness to pay for a cure in patients with chronic gout. Medical Decision Making 2008. Mar 18; [Epub ahead of print].
Metagegevens
Titel
The disutility of chronic gout
Auteurs
Dinesh Khanna
Mansoor Ahmed
Dustin Yontz
Shaari S. Ginsburg
Grace S. Park
Anthony Leonard
Joel Tsevat
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2008
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9355-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2008

Quality of Life Research 5/2008 Naar de uitgave