Skip to main content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 3/2016

22-08-2015

The development of a questionnaire measure of diabetes-related distress in Chinese-speaking patients: the Diabetes-Related Distress Questionnaire (DRDQ)

Auteurs: Huey-Fen Wang, Neng-Chun Yu, Wayne H-H Sheu, Mei Chang Yeh

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To develop and evaluate the reliability and validity of a Diabetes-Related Distress Questionnaire for Chinese-speaking patients with diabetes.

Methods

The Diabetes-Related Distress Questionnaire (DRDQ) included 11 quality-of-life questions translated from a Diabetes, Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs study and four native items developed by researchers based on patients’ experiences. A sample of 981 Chinese-speaking patients with diabetes in Taiwan was invited to complete the questionnaire.

Results

A minimum of 4.2 % of patients used each response option for each item. Exploratory factor analysis suggested a two-factor structure, representing treatment-related distress (factor 1) and progression-related distress (factor 2). The mean loading of items on their corresponding factor was high (0.60), while the mean loading on the other factor was low (0.10). A confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a single structure of the DRDQ (root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.063, comparative fit index = 0.93). The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.89 for the DRDQ scale, 0.87 for the factor 1, and 0.68 for the factor 2. As expected, people with insulin-treated and HbA1c > 7 % reported significantly greater negative scores than their counterparts on the total score and all items of the DRDQ, with the exception of item 2. A moderate effect size was demonstrated between insulin known groups (ranging from 0.14 to 0.46) and between HbA1c known groups (ranging from 0.08 to 0.87).

Conclusions

The DRDQ is a psychometrically sound instrument that can be used to assess diabetes-related distress in Chinese-speaking patients in Taiwan.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Debono, M., & Cachia, E. (2007). The impact of diabetes on psychological well being and quality of life. The role of patient education. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 12(5), 545–555. CrossRefPubMed Debono, M., & Cachia, E. (2007). The impact of diabetes on psychological well being and quality of life. The role of patient education. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 12(5), 545–555. CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Glasgow, R. E., Toobert, D., & Gillette, C. (2001). Psychosocial barriers to diabetes self-management and quality of life. Diabetes Spectrum, 14(1), 33–41. CrossRef Glasgow, R. E., Toobert, D., & Gillette, C. (2001). Psychosocial barriers to diabetes self-management and quality of life. Diabetes Spectrum, 14(1), 33–41. CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Makine, C., et al. (2009). Symptoms of depression and diabetes-specific emotional distress are associated with a negative appraisal of insulin therapy in insulin-naïve patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. A study from the European Depression in Diabetes [EDID] Research Consortium. Diabetic Medicine, 26(1), 28–33. CrossRefPubMed Makine, C., et al. (2009). Symptoms of depression and diabetes-specific emotional distress are associated with a negative appraisal of insulin therapy in insulin-naïve patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. A study from the European Depression in Diabetes [EDID] Research Consortium. Diabetic Medicine, 26(1), 28–33. CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fisher, L., Glasgow, R. E., & Strycker, L. A. (2010). The relationship between diabetes distress and clinical depression with glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 33(5), 1034–1036. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Fisher, L., Glasgow, R. E., & Strycker, L. A. (2010). The relationship between diabetes distress and clinical depression with glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 33(5), 1034–1036. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fisher, L., et al. (2010). Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Diabetes Care, 33(1), 23–28. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Fisher, L., et al. (2010). Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Diabetes Care, 33(1), 23–28. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Chuang, L. M., et al. (2002). The status of diabetes control in Asia—a cross-sectional survey of 24317 patients with diabetes mellitus in 1998. Diabetic Medicine, 19(12), 978–985. CrossRefPubMed Chuang, L. M., et al. (2002). The status of diabetes control in Asia—a cross-sectional survey of 24317 patients with diabetes mellitus in 1998. Diabetic Medicine, 19(12), 978–985. CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mohamed, M. (2008). An audit on diabetes management in Asian patients treated by specialists: the Diabcare-Asia 1998 and 2003 studies. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 24(2), 507–514. CrossRefPubMed Mohamed, M. (2008). An audit on diabetes management in Asian patients treated by specialists: the Diabcare-Asia 1998 and 2003 studies. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 24(2), 507–514. CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yu, N.-C., et al. (2013). Trends of ABC control 2006–2011: A national survey of diabetes health promotion institutes in Taiwan. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 99(2), 112–119. CrossRefPubMed Yu, N.-C., et al. (2013). Trends of ABC control 2006–2011: A national survey of diabetes health promotion institutes in Taiwan. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 99(2), 112–119. CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pan, C., et al. (2012). Psychological status of Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes: data review of Diabcare-China studies. Diabetic Medicine, 29(4), 515–521. CrossRefPubMed Pan, C., et al. (2012). Psychological status of Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes: data review of Diabcare-China studies. Diabetic Medicine, 29(4), 515–521. CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Fisher, L., et al. (2008). Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument. The Annals of Family Medicine, 6(3), 246–252. CrossRefPubMed Fisher, L., et al. (2008). Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument. The Annals of Family Medicine, 6(3), 246–252. CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lou, V. W. Q., & Zhang, Y. (2006). Evaluating the effectiveness of a participatory empowerment group for Chinese type 2 diabetes patients. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(5), 491–499. CrossRef Lou, V. W. Q., & Zhang, Y. (2006). Evaluating the effectiveness of a participatory empowerment group for Chinese type 2 diabetes patients. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(5), 491–499. CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lee, S., et al. (2006). Treatment-related stresses and anxiety-depressive symptoms among Chinese outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Hong Kong. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 74(3), 282–288. CrossRefPubMed Lee, S., et al. (2006). Treatment-related stresses and anxiety-depressive symptoms among Chinese outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Hong Kong. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 74(3), 282–288. CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Ting, R. Z. W., et al. (2011). Diabetes-related distress and physical and psychological health in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care, 34(5), 1094–1096. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ting, R. Z. W., et al. (2011). Diabetes-related distress and physical and psychological health in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care, 34(5), 1094–1096. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bradley, C., & Speight, J. (2002). Patient perceptions of diabetes and diabetes therapy: assessing quality of life. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 18(S3), S64–S69. CrossRefPubMed Bradley, C., & Speight, J. (2002). Patient perceptions of diabetes and diabetes therapy: assessing quality of life. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 18(S3), S64–S69. CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference De Berardis, G., et al. (2002). Erectile dysfunction and quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients A serious problem too often overlooked. Diabetes Care, 25(2), 284–291. CrossRefPubMed De Berardis, G., et al. (2002). Erectile dysfunction and quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients A serious problem too often overlooked. Diabetes Care, 25(2), 284–291. CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference De Berardis, G., et al. (2005). Longitudinal assessment of quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes and self-reported erectile dysfunction. Diabetes Care, 28(11), 2637–2643. CrossRefPubMed De Berardis, G., et al. (2005). Longitudinal assessment of quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes and self-reported erectile dysfunction. Diabetes Care, 28(11), 2637–2643. CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Alberti, G. (2002). The DAWN (diabetes attitudes, wishes and needs) study. Practical Diabetes International, 19, 22–24a. CrossRef Alberti, G. (2002). The DAWN (diabetes attitudes, wishes and needs) study. Practical Diabetes International, 19, 22–24a. CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Funnell, M. M. (2006). The diabetes attitudes, wishes, and needs (DAWN) study. Clinical Diabetes, 24(4), 154–155. CrossRef Funnell, M. M. (2006). The diabetes attitudes, wishes, and needs (DAWN) study. Clinical Diabetes, 24(4), 154–155. CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Skovlund, S. E., & Peyrot, M. (2005). The diabetes attitudes, wishes, and needs (DAWN) Program: A new approach to improving outcomes of diabetes care. Diabetes Spectrum, 18(3), 136–142. CrossRef Skovlund, S. E., & Peyrot, M. (2005). The diabetes attitudes, wishes, and needs (DAWN) Program: A new approach to improving outcomes of diabetes care. Diabetes Spectrum, 18(3), 136–142. CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Peyrot, M., et al. (2005). Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: Results of the Cross-National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study. Diabetic Medicine, 22(10), 1379–1385. CrossRefPubMed Peyrot, M., et al. (2005). Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: Results of the Cross-National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study. Diabetic Medicine, 22(10), 1379–1385. CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rubin, R. R., Peyrot, M., & Siminerio, L. M. (2006). Health care and patient-reported outcomes: Results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care, 29(6), 1249–1255. CrossRefPubMed Rubin, R. R., Peyrot, M., & Siminerio, L. M. (2006). Health care and patient-reported outcomes: Results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care, 29(6), 1249–1255. CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Wild, D., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94–104. CrossRefPubMed Wild, D., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94–104. CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Cappelleri, J. C., Zou, K. H., Bushmakin, A. G., Alvir, J. M. J., Alemayehu, D., & Symonds, T. (2013). Patient-reported outcomes: Measurement, implementation and interpretation. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. Cappelleri, J. C., Zou, K. H., Bushmakin, A. G., Alvir, J. M. J., Alemayehu, D., & Symonds, T. (2013). Patient-reported outcomes: Measurement, implementation and interpretation. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
26.
go back to reference Kong, D., et al. (2011). Adaptation of the audit of diabetes-dependent quality of life questionnaire to people with diabetes in China. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 94(1), 45–52. CrossRefPubMed Kong, D., et al. (2011). Adaptation of the audit of diabetes-dependent quality of life questionnaire to people with diabetes in China. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 94(1), 45–52. CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Bradley, C., et al. (1999). The development of an individualized questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: The ADDQoL. Quality of Life Research, 8(1), 79–91. CrossRefPubMed Bradley, C., et al. (1999). The development of an individualized questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: The ADDQoL. Quality of Life Research, 8(1), 79–91. CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Nakahara, R., et al. (2006). Prospective study on influence of psychosocial factors on glycemic control in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Psychosomatics, 47(3), 240–246. CrossRefPubMed Nakahara, R., et al. (2006). Prospective study on influence of psychosocial factors on glycemic control in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Psychosomatics, 47(3), 240–246. CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Delahanty, L. M. (2007). Association of diabetes-related emotional distress with diabetes treatment in primary care patients with Type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 24(1), 48. CrossRefPubMed Delahanty, L. M. (2007). Association of diabetes-related emotional distress with diabetes treatment in primary care patients with Type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 24(1), 48. CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
The development of a questionnaire measure of diabetes-related distress in Chinese-speaking patients: the Diabetes-Related Distress Questionnaire (DRDQ)
Auteurs
Huey-Fen Wang
Neng-Chun Yu
Wayne H-H Sheu
Mei Chang Yeh
Publicatiedatum
22-08-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1106-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2016

Quality of Life Research 3/2016 Naar de uitgave

Special Section: PROs in Non-Standard Settings (by invitation only)

Mode of administration does not cause bias in patient-reported outcome results: a meta-analysis