Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness 4/2020

17-01-2020 | ORIGINAL PAPER

The De-automatizing Function of Mindfulness Facets: an Empirical Test

Auteurs: Giulia Fuochi, Alberto Voci

Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness | Uitgave 4/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Objectives

Building upon the theoretical model of de-automatization, according to which the de-automatizing effect of mindfulness on cognitive processes has desirable health and social outcomes, we hypothesized that (1) dispositional mindfulness facets would be related to higher well-being (higher life satisfaction, lower perceived stress), and positive social outcomes (greater perspective taking, lower use of stereotypes); (2) these effects would be mediated by lower rumination, higher cognitive flexibility, higher decentering, and lower thought suppression, identified as de-automatization mediators.

Methods

We tested this mediational model with SEM, in a large sample (N = 1153).

Results

Results supported the hypothesized model more for individual than for social outcomes. Cognitive flexibility, decentering, and to a smaller extent suppression mediated the relationships between mindfulness facets and the two well-being outcomes, while rumination was a mediator only in the model for perceived stress. Acting with awareness, nonjudging, and nonreactivity had mixed relationships with perspective taking: positive via cognitive flexibility, negative via rumination; rumination instead conveyed a positive association between observing and perspective taking. Cognitive flexibility also mediated the positive relationships between observing and describing and perspective taking. Acting with awareness, nonjudging, and nonreactivity were negatively related to stereotyping only via reduced suppression. Effects sizes (standardized indirect effects) were small to medium (from 0.02 to 0.20 in absolute value).

Conclusions

The association between dispositional mindfulness and mental health indicators may be partially explained by a reduction in maladaptive automatized cognitive processes, while only some features of de-automatization positively relate to social outcomes.
Literatuur
go back to reference Albiero, P., Ingoglia, S., & Lo Coco, A. (2006). A contribution to the Italian validation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 13, 107–125. Albiero, P., Ingoglia, S., & Lo Coco, A. (2006). A contribution to the Italian validation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 13, 107–125.
go back to reference Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2011). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2011). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
go back to reference Pearson, M. R., Brown, D. B., Bravo, A. J., & Witkiewitz, K. (2015). Staying in the moment and finding purpose: the associations of trait mindfulness, decentering, and purpose in life with depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and alcohol-related problems. Mindfulness, 6, 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0300-8.CrossRef Pearson, M. R., Brown, D. B., Bravo, A. J., & Witkiewitz, K. (2015). Staying in the moment and finding purpose: the associations of trait mindfulness, decentering, and purpose in life with depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and alcohol-related problems. Mindfulness, 6, 645–653. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12671-014-0300-8.CrossRef
go back to reference Peters, J. R., Smart, L. M., Eisenlohr-Moul, T. A., Geiger, P. J., Smith, G. T., & Baer, R. A. (2015). Anger rumination as a mediation of the relationship between mindfulness and aggression: the utility of a multidimensional mindfulness model. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71, 871–884. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22189.CrossRefPubMed Peters, J. R., Smart, L. M., Eisenlohr-Moul, T. A., Geiger, P. J., Smith, G. T., & Baer, R. A. (2015). Anger rumination as a mediation of the relationship between mindfulness and aggression: the utility of a multidimensional mindfulness model. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71, 871–884. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jclp.​22189.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pica, G., Amato, C., Mauro, R., & Pierro, A. (2015). Individual differences in preference for thought suppression: components and correlates of the white bear suppression inventory. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 22, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM22.1.3.CrossRef Pica, G., Amato, C., Mauro, R., & Pierro, A. (2015). Individual differences in preference for thought suppression: components and correlates of the white bear suppression inventory. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 22, 31–42. https://​doi.​org/​10.​4473/​TPM22.​1.​3.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.CrossRef Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.CrossRef
go back to reference Safran, J. D., & Segal, Z. V. (1990). Interpersonal process in cognitive therapy. New York: Basic Books. Safran, J. D., & Segal, Z. V. (1990). Interpersonal process in cognitive therapy. New York: Basic Books.
go back to reference Whitehead, R., Bates, G., Elphinstone, B., Yang, Y., & Murray, G. (2019). Nonattachment mediates the relationship between mindfulness and psychological well-being, subjective well-being, and depression, anxiety and stress. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20, 2141-2158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0041-9.CrossRef Whitehead, R., Bates, G., Elphinstone, B., Yang, Y., & Murray, G. (2019). Nonattachment mediates the relationship between mindfulness and psychological well-being, subjective well-being, and depression, anxiety and stress. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20, 2141-2158. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10902-018-0041-9.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The De-automatizing Function of Mindfulness Facets: an Empirical Test
Auteurs
Giulia Fuochi
Alberto Voci
Publicatiedatum
17-01-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Mindfulness / Uitgave 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1868-8527
Elektronisch ISSN: 1868-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01305-w

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2020

Mindfulness 4/2020 Naar de uitgave