Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2012

01-09-2012 | Original Article

The cost of serially chaining two cognitive operations

Auteurs: Zhao Fan, Krish Singh, Suresh Muthukumaraswamy, Mariano Sigman, Stanislas Dehaene, Kimron Shapiro

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

As Turing (1936, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society) noted, a fundamental process in human cognition is to effect chained sequential operations in which the second operation requires an input from the preceding one. Although a great deal is known about the costs associated with ‘independent’ (unrelated) operations, e.g., from the classic psychological refractory period paradigm, far less is known about those operations to which Turing referred. We present the results of two behavioural experiments, where participants were required to perform two speeded sequential tasks that were either chained or independent. Both experiments reveal the reaction time cost of chaining, over and above classical dual-task serial costs. Moreover, the chaining operation significantly altered the distribution of reaction times relative to the Independent condition in terms of an increased mean and variance. These results are discussed in terms of the cognitive architecture underlying the serial chaining of cognitive operations.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
Response grouping is the tendency for participants to wait for the occurrence of Task 2 before initiating their response to Task 1. Procedure to discourage grouping was adapted from Van Selst and Jolicoeur (1994).
 
2
For RT analysis, only trials with correct Task 1 and Task 2 responses and correct response order were entered into the analysis. An outlier screening procedure (Van Selst & Jolicoeur, 1994) was used to exclude outlier RTs in each cell for each participant. Less than 3.6% of trials were labelled as outliers in the RT analysis using this approach. Post hoc analyses in each ANOVA of each experiment were conducted using the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
 
3
Most mental operations are Poissonian, increasing the variance linearly with RT; there are, however a few important exceptions (cf. Wagenmakers & Brown, 2007). For example, Sigman and Dehaene (2005) showed that there are manipulations that affect mean RT without affecting the variance, e.g., changing the notation of a number from Arab digits to words in a number comparison task. It was not clear a priori whether the chaining task we inserted between T1 and T2 (which contributes to increased RT) also provided a significant contribution to the variance.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Arnell, K. M., & Duncan, J. (2002). Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 105–147.PubMedCrossRef Arnell, K. M., & Duncan, J. (2002). Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 105–147.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Botvinick, M. M. (2008). Hierarchical models of behavior and prefrontal function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 201–208.PubMedCrossRef Botvinick, M. M. (2008). Hierarchical models of behavior and prefrontal function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 201–208.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Brisson, B., & Jolicoeur, P. (2007). Cross-modal multitasking processing deficits prior to the central bottleneck revealed by event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 45(13), 3038–3053.PubMedCrossRef Brisson, B., & Jolicoeur, P. (2007). Cross-modal multitasking processing deficits prior to the central bottleneck revealed by event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 45(13), 3038–3053.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109–127.PubMedCrossRef Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109–127.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965–980.PubMedCrossRef De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965–980.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fischer, R., Miller, J., & Schubert, T. (2007). Evidence for parallel semantic memory retrieval in dual tasks. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1685–1699.CrossRef Fischer, R., Miller, J., & Schubert, T. (2007). Evidence for parallel semantic memory retrieval in dual tasks. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1685–1699.CrossRef
go back to reference Fischer, R., & Schubert, T. (2008). Valence processing bypassing the response selection bottleneck? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Experimental Psychology, 55(3), 203–211.PubMedCrossRef Fischer, R., & Schubert, T. (2008). Valence processing bypassing the response selection bottleneck? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Experimental Psychology, 55(3), 203–211.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2001). Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 10–16.PubMedCrossRef Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2001). Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 10–16.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002). Banburismus and the brain: Decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward. Neuron, 36, 299–308.PubMedCrossRef Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002). Banburismus and the brain: Decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward. Neuron, 36, 299–308.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kawahara, J. (2003). The effect of observer’s set on the processing of temporally distributed items. Japanese Psychological Research, 45, 109–114.CrossRef Kawahara, J. (2003). The effect of observer’s set on the processing of temporally distributed items. Japanese Psychological Research, 45, 109–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393–434.PubMedCrossRef Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393–434.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Maquestiaux, F., Laguë-Beauvais, M., Ruthruff, E., & Bherer, L. (2008). Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1262–1282.CrossRef Maquestiaux, F., Laguë-Beauvais, M., Ruthruff, E., & Bherer, L. (2008). Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1262–1282.CrossRef
go back to reference Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–65. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–65.
go back to reference Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple task performance: Part 2 Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749–791.CrossRef Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple task performance: Part 2 Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749–791.CrossRef
go back to reference Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1999). Precis to a practical unified theory of cognition and action: Some lessons from computational modeling of human multiple-task performance. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII (pp. 15–88). Cambridge: MIT Press. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1999). Precis to a practical unified theory of cognition and action: Some lessons from computational modeling of human multiple-task performance. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII (pp. 15–88). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rolke, B. (2009). On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 273–310.PubMedCrossRef Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rolke, B. (2009). On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 273–310.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Oriet, C., Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2005). Symbolic distance affects two processing loci in the number comparison task. Memory & Cognition, 33(5), 913–926.CrossRef Oriet, C., Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2005). Symbolic distance affects two processing loci in the number comparison task. Memory & Cognition, 33(5), 913–926.CrossRef
go back to reference Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358–377.PubMedCrossRef Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358–377.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244.PubMedCrossRef Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.PubMedCrossRef Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ratcliff, R. (1988). Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling the accumulation of partial information. Psychological Review, 95, 238–255.PubMedCrossRef Ratcliff, R. (1988). Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling the accumulation of partial information. Psychological Review, 95, 238–255.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849–860.PubMedCrossRef Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849–860.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sackur, J., & Dehaene, S. (2009). The cognitive architecture for chaining of two mental operations. Cognition, 111(2), 187–211.PubMedCrossRef Sackur, J., & Dehaene, S. (2009). The cognitive architecture for chaining of two mental operations. Cognition, 111(2), 187–211.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schumacher, E. H., & Schwarb, H. (2009). Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 270–290.CrossRef Schumacher, E. H., & Schwarb, H. (2009). Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 270–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., & Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 357–371.PubMedCrossRef Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., & Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 357–371.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Parsing a cognitive task: A characterization of the mind’s bottleneck. PLoS Biology, 3(2), e37.PubMedCrossRef Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Parsing a cognitive task: A characterization of the mind’s bottleneck. PLoS Biology, 3(2), e37.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 3–18.PubMedCrossRef Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 3–18.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tubau, E., Hommel, B., & López-Moliner, J. (2007). Modes of executive control in sequence learning: From stimulus-based to plan-based control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 43–63.CrossRef Tubau, E., Hommel, B., & López-Moliner, J. (2007). Modes of executive control in sequence learning: From stimulus-based to plan-based control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 43–63.CrossRef
go back to reference Turing, A. M. (1936). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungs problem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 42. Turing, A. M. (1936). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungs problem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 42.
go back to reference Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550–592.PubMedCrossRef Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550–592.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(3), 631–650.CrossRef Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(3), 631–650.CrossRef
go back to reference Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Brown, S. (2007). On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review, 114, 830–841.PubMedCrossRef Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Brown, S. (2007). On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review, 114, 830–841.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The cost of serially chaining two cognitive operations
Auteurs
Zhao Fan
Krish Singh
Suresh Muthukumaraswamy
Mariano Sigman
Stanislas Dehaene
Kimron Shapiro
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0375-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2012

Psychological Research 5/2012 Naar de uitgave