Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-12-2017 | Research | Uitgave 1/2017 Open Access

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2017

The clinical diagnosis of symptomatic forefoot neuroma in the general population: a Delphi consensus study

Tijdschrift:
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research > Uitgave 1/2017
Auteurs:
Charlotte Dando, Lindsey Cherry, Lyndon Jones, Catherine Bowen
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13047-017-0241-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Background

There is limited evidence for defining what specific method or methods should be used to clinically influence clinical decision making for forefoot neuroma. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical assessment protocol that has agreed expert consensus for the clinical diagnosis of forefoot neuroma.

Methods

A four-round Delphi consensus study was completed with 16 expert health professionals from either a clinical or clinical academic background, following completion of a structured literature review. Clinical experience ranged from 5 to 34 years (mean: 19.5 years). Consensus was sought on the optimal methods to achieve the clinical diagnosis of forefoot neuroma. Round 1 sought individual input with an open ended question. This developed a list of recommendations. Round 2 and 3 asked the participants to accept or reject each of the recommendations in the list in relation to the question: “What is the best way to clinically diagnose neuroma in the forefoot?” Votes that were equal to or greater than 60% were accepted into the next round; participant’s votes equal to or less then 20% were excluded. The remaining participant’s votes between 20 to 60% were accepted and placed into the following round for voting. Round 4 asked the participants to rank the list of recommendations according to the strength of recommendation they would give in relation to the question: “What is the best way to clinically diagnose neuroma in the forefoot?” The recruitment and Delphi rounds were conducted through email.

Results

In round 1, the 16 participants identified 68 recommendations for the clinical diagnosis of forefoot neuroma. In round 2, 27 recommendations were accepted, 11 recommendations were rejected and 30 recommendations were assigned to be re-voted on. In round 3, 36 recommendations were accepted, 22 recommendations were rejected and 11 recommendations were assigned to be re-voted on. In round 4, 21 recommendations were selected by the participants to form the expert derived clinical assessment protocol for the clinical diagnosis of forefoot neuroma. From these 21 recommendations, a set of themes were established: location of pain, non weight bearing sensation, weight bearing sensation, observations, tests and imaging.

Conclusion

Following the identification of 21 method recommendations, a core set of clinical diagnostic methods have been prepared as a clinical assessment protocol for the diagnosis of forefoot neuroma. Based on expert opinion, the core set will assist clinicians in forming a clearer diagnosis of forefoot neuroma.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Extra materiaal
Additional file 1: Round 2 votes of the accepted, rejected and re-voted methods for the clinical diagnosis of forefoot neuroma. (DOCX 12 kb)
13047_2017_241_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Additional file 2: Round 3 votes of the accepted, rejected and re-voted methods for the clinical diagnosis of forefoot neuroma. (DOCX 13 kb)
13047_2017_241_MOESM2_ESM.docx
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2017

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2017 Naar de uitgave