Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1083-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
To examine the validity of using the same scoring coefficients across countries for the SF-12.
We test the equality of scoring coefficients derived for a contraction of the SF-36, the Short Form 12 (SF-12), using a large international database drawn from nine countries, to test equality between Australia and twelve other country/language groups. First, we checked that the theoretical structure of the SF-12 as set out by Ware and colleagues, but including a correlation between physical and mental health, provided an adequate fit to the data for each country/language group in a confirmatory factor analysis. We then compared Australia to all of these country/language groups in multiple-group models to assess whether a model producing common factor score coefficients provided an adequate fit to the data. We also derived Chi-squared tests for the differences between the restricted and unrestricted models, to test the equality of the factor score coefficients across countries.
We found that the theoretical structure of the SF-12, with a correlation between physical and mental health, provides an adequate fit to the data for all country/language groups except Hungary. Further, all the unrestricted multiple-group models provide an adequate fit to the data. In contrast, none of the multiple-group models restricted to common parameters provide an adequate fit to the data. The significance tests confirm that the constraints on parameter values produce significantly different models to the unrestricted models.
We conclude that researchers should derive their own country-specific scoring coefficients for physical and mental health summary scores.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Wilson, D., Tucker, G., & Chittleborough, C. (2002). Rethinking and rescoring the SF-12. Sozial-und Präventivmedizin, 47, 172–177. PubMed
Tucker, G. R., Adams, R. J., Wilson D.H. (2013) Observed agreement problems between sub-scales and summary components of the SF-36 Version 2—An alternative scoring method can correct the problem. PLoS ONE. 8(4): e61191.
Hawthorne, G., Osborne, R. H., Taylor, A., et al. (2007). The SF-36 Version 2: Critical analyses of weights, scoring algorithms and population norms. Quality of Life Research, 16(661), 73.
Farrivar, S. S., Cunningham, W. E., & Hays, R. D. (2007). Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 health survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 54. CrossRef
Agnastopoulos, F., Niakis, D., & Tountas, Y. (2009). Comparison between exploratory factor analytic and SEM-based approaches to constructing SF-36 summary scores. Quality of Life Research, 18, 53–63. CrossRef
Taft, C., Karlsson, J., & Sullivan, M. (2001). Reply to Drs Ware and Kosinski. Quality of Life Research, 10, 415–420. CrossRef
Stats Canada. (2011). The Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey, 2003 and 2008 Public Use Microdata File User’s Manual.
Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra. (2006). Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey: User Guide, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Catalogue Number 4228.0.55.002.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1995). National Health Survey. SF-36 Population Norms Australia. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Catalogue Number 4399.0.
Ware, J., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. (1995). SF-12: How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales (2nd ed.). Boston: The Health Institute, New England MedicalCenter.
Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 625–641. CrossRef
Nye, C. D., & Drasgow, F. (2011). Assessing goodness of fit: Simple rules of thumb simply do not work. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 548–570. CrossRef
Joreskog, K. G. (2000). Latent variable scores and their uses. ILScientific Software International: Lincolnwood.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL user’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Bryant, F. B., & Satorra, A. (2012). Principles and Practice of Scaled Difference Chi Square Testing. Structural Equation Modeling, 19(3), 372–398. CrossRef
Guilleman, E., Bombardier, L., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(13), 1417–1432. CrossRef
Herdman, M., Fox-Rushby, J., & Badia, X. (1997). Equivalence and the translation and adaptation of health related quality of life questionnaires. Quality of Life Research, 6(3), 4–237. CrossRef
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, L., Guilleman, F., et al. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3816–3891.
Life Expectancy Trends-Australia. Australian Social Trends, March (2011). Australian Bureau of Statistics. Catalogue 4102.0.
- The case for using country-specific scoring coefficients for scoring the SF-12, with scoring implications for the SF-36
- Springer International Publishing