Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

28-08-2020

The association between self-reported health status and adverse events: a comparison among coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Auteurs: Stine Nørris Nielsen, Trine Bernholdt Rasmussen, Jens Flensted Lassen, Selina Kikkenborg Berg, Lars Thrysoee, Jacob Eifer Møller, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Anne Langhoff Thuesen, Anne Vinggaard Christensen, Ola Ekholm, Rikke Mols, Charlotte Brun Thorup, Britt Borregaard

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 11/2020

Abstract

Purpose

While several studies have investigated clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), studies investigating self-reported health and the association with adverse outcomes are limited. Thus, the aim was to investigate differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), anxiety and depression at discharge and the association with a composite endpoint of the first event of acute cardiac readmission, revascularisation or 1-year mortality among patients undergoing CABG vs. PCI.

Methods

Data from the national cohort study, DenHeart, were used, including measures of HRQoL; EuroQoL-5D-5L (EQ-5D Index Score and VAS) and HeartQoL (Global, Physical and Emotional), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS) and register-based follow-up. A total of 7000 patients were included (CABG n = 652, PCI n = 6348) (median age 65, 75% men). Cox Proportional Hazard models were performed among a propensity-matched population of responders (n = 520).

Results

HRQoL was significantly better among patients undergoing PCI vs. CABG, but with no differences in time to readmission or revascularisation. HRQoL, anxiety and depression were significantly associated with the risk of the composite endpoint among the PCI group (Hazard Ratio, HR (95% confidence intervals, CI) [EQ-5D index score 3.07 (1.67–5.67), EQ-5D VAS 0.97 (0.96–0.99), HeartQol Global 0.61 (0.38–0.95), HeartQol Emotional 0.56 (0.39–0.80), HADS-D ≥ 8 3.12 (1.61–6.01), HADS-A ≥ 8 2.08 (1.14–3.80)].

Conclusion

Patients undergoing PCI reported better HRQoL at discharge compared with patients undergoing CABG, whereas readmission rates were similar. Self-reported health was associated with the risk of adverse events among patients undergoing PCI, but not among patients undergoing CABG.

Clinical trial registration

NCT01926145.

vorige artikel Clinicians versus patients subjective adverse events assessment: based on patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE)

volgende artikel Health-related quality of life and physical activity level after a behavior change program at Norwegian healthy life centers: a 15-month follow-up

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Sanchis-Gomar, F., Perez-Quilis, C., Leischik, R., et al. (2016). Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. Annals of Translational Medicine, 4(13), 256. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.06.33. (publishedOnlineFirst:2016/08/09). CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sousa-Uva, M., Neumann, F. J., Ahlsson, A., et al. (2019). 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 55(1), 4–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezy289. (publishedOnlineFirst:2018/08/31). CrossRefPubMed

Head, S. J., Milojevic, M., Taggart, D. P., et al. (2017). Current practice of state-of-the-art surgical coronary revascularization. Circulation, 136(14), 1331–1345. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022572. (publishedOnlineFirst:2017/10/04). CrossRefPubMed

Byrne, R. A., Stone, G. W., Ormiston, J., et al. (2017). Coronary balloon angioplasty, stents, and scaffolds. Lancet, 390(10096), 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31927-X. (publishedOnlineFirst:2017/08/24). CrossRefPubMed

Mulukutla, S. R., Gleason, T. G., Sharbaugh, M., et al. (2019). Coronary bypass versus percutaneous revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 108(2), 474–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.02.064. (publishedOnlineFirst:2019/05/06). CrossRefPubMed

Makikallio, T., Holm, N. R., Lindsay, M., et al. (2016). Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet, 388(10061), 2743–2752. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32052-9. (publishedOnlineFirst:2016/11/05). CrossRefPubMed

Mohr, F. W., Morice, M. C., Kappetein, A. P., et al. (2013). Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet, 381(9867), 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60141-5. (publishedOnlineFirst:2013/02/27). CrossRefPubMed

Stone, G. W., Kappetein, A. P., Sabik, J. F., et al. (2019). Five-year outcomes after PCI or CABG for left main coronary disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 381(19), 1820–1830. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1909406. (publishedOnlineFirst:2019/09/29). CrossRefPubMed

Baron, S. J., Chinnakondepalli, K., Magnuson, E. A., et al. (2017). Quality-of-life after everolimus-eluting stents or bypass surgery for left-main disease: results from the EXCEL trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 70(25), 3113–3122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.036. (publishedOnlineFirst:2017/11/04). CrossRefPubMed

10.

McGrath, B. M., Norris, C. M., Hardwicke-Brown, E., et al. (2017). Quality of life following coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs. percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetics with multivessel disease: a five-year registry study. European Heart Journal-Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, 3(3), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw055. (published Online First: 2017/08/26). CrossRefPubMed

11.

Kulik, A. (2017). Quality of life after coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention: what do the trials tell us? Current Opinion in Cardiology, 32(6), 707–714. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000000458. (publishedOnlineFirst:2017/08/24). CrossRefPubMed

12.

Abdallah, M. S., Wang, K., Magnuson, E. A., et al. (2017). Quality of life after surgery or DES in patients with 3-vessel or left main disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 69(16), 2039–2050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.031. (publishedOnlineFirst:2017/04/22). CrossRefPubMed

13.

Abdallah, M. S., Wang, K., Magnuson, E. A., et al. (2013). Quality of life after PCI vs CABG among patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 310(15), 1581–1590. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.279208. (publishedOnlineFirst:2013/10/17). CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Takagi, H., Ando, T., Umemoto, T., et al. (2017). Perioperative depression or anxiety and postoperative mortality in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart and Vessels, 32(12), 1458–1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-017-1022-3. (publishedOnlineFirst:2017/07/14). CrossRefPubMed

15.

Geulayov, G., Novikov, I., Dankner, D., et al. (2018). Symptoms of depression and anxiety and 11-year all-cause mortality in men and women undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 105, 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.11.017. (publishedOnlineFirst:2018/01/16). CrossRefPubMed

16.

Stenman, M., Holzmann, M. J., & Sartipy, U. (2016). Association between preoperative depression and long-term survival following coronary artery bypass surgery—a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Cardiology, 222, 462–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.216. (publishedOnlineFirst:2016/08/10). CrossRefPubMed

17.

Yu, H. Y., Park, Y. S., & Son, Y. J. (2017). Combined effect of left ventricular ejection fraction and post-cardiac depressive symptoms on major adverse cardiac events after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a 12-month follow-up. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 16(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515116634530. (publishedOnlineFirst:2016/02/19). CrossRefPubMed

18.

Iles-Smith, H., McGowan, L., Campbell, M., et al. (2015). A prospective cohort study investigating readmission, symptom attribution and psychological health within six months of primary percutaneous coronary intervention. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 14(6), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515114543227. (publishedOnlineFirst:2014/07/16). CrossRefPubMed

19.

Meyer, T., Hussein, S., Lange, H. W., et al. (2015). Anxiety is associated with a reduction in both mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events five years after coronary stenting. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 22(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487313505244. (publishedOnlineFirst:2013/09/21). CrossRefPubMed

20.

van Dijk, M. R., Utens, E. M., Dulfer, K., et al. (2016). Depression and anxiety symptoms as predictors of mortality in PCI patients at 10 years of follow-up. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 23(5), 552–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487315571889. (publishedOnlineFirst:2015/02/11). CrossRefPubMed

21.

de Jager, T. A. J., Dulfer, K., Radhoe, S., et al. (2018). Predictive value of depression and anxiety for long-term mortality: differences in outcome between acute coronary syndrome and stable angina pectoris. International Journal of Cardiology, 250, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.005. (publishedOnlineFirst:2017/10/11). CrossRefPubMed

22.

Berg, S. K., Svanholm, J., Lauberg, A., et al. (2014). Patient-reported outcomes at hospital discharge from Heart Centres, a national cross-sectional survey with a register-based follow-up: the DenHeart study protocol. British Medical Journal Open, 4(5), e004709. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004709. (publishedOnlineFirst:2014/05/06). CrossRef

23.

NOMESCO, N. (2011). NOMESCO Classification of Surgical Procedures (NCSP), version 1.16. Copenhagen. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:norden:org:diva-4605.

24.

Pedersen, C. B. (2011). The danish civil registration system. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39(7 Suppl), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810387965. (publishedOnlineFirst:2011/08/04). CrossRefPubMed

25.

Lynge, E., Sandegaard, J. L., & Rebolj, M. (2011). The danish national patient register. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39(7 Suppl), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494811401482. (publishedOnlineFirst:2011/08/04). CrossRefPubMed

26.

Jensen, V. M., & Rasmussen, A. W. (2011). Danish education registers. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39(7 Suppl), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810394715. (publishedOnlineFirst:2011/08/04). CrossRefPubMed

27.

Tu, J. V., Austin, P. C., Walld, R., et al. (2001). Development and validation of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 37(4), 992–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01109-3. (publishedOnlineFirst:2001/03/27). CrossRefPubMed

28.

Rabin, R., & de Charro, F. (2001). EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890109002087. (publishedOnlineFirst:2001/08/09). CrossRefPubMed

29.

Oldridge, N., Saner, H., McGee, H. M., et al. (2005). The Euro Cardio-QoL Project. An international study to develop a core heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire, the HeartQoL. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, 12(2), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjr.0000159408.05180.0e. (published Online First: 2005/03/24). CrossRef

30.

Oldridge, N., Hofer, S., McGee, H., et al. (2014). The HeartQoL: Part I. Development of a new core health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with ischemic heart disease. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 21(1), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487312450544. (published Online First: 2012/07/24). CrossRefPubMed

31.

Oldridge, N., Hofer, S., McGee, H., et al. (2014). The HeartQoL: part II. Validation of a new core health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with ischemic heart disease. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 21(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487312450545. (published Online First: 2012/07/24). CrossRefPubMed

32.

Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. (publishedOnlineFirst:1983/06/01). CrossRefPubMed

33.

De Smedt, D., Clays, E., Doyle, F., et al. (2013). Validity and reliability of three commonly used quality of life measures in a large European population of coronary heart disease patients. International Journal of Cardiology, 167(5), 2294–2299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.06.025. (publishedOnlineFirst:2012/07/04). CrossRefPubMed

34.

De Smedt, D., Clays, E., Hofer, S., et al. (2016). Validity and reliability of the HeartQoL questionnaire in a large sample of stable coronary patients: the EUROASPIRE IV study of the European society of cardiology. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 23(7), 714–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487315604837. (publishedOnlineFirst:2015/09/12). CrossRefPubMed

35.

WMA. (1964). Declaration of Helsinki. In H. 18th WMA General Assembly, Finland (Ed.), (Vol. 18th).

36.

Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. CrossRef

37.

Thoemmes, F. J., & Kim, E. S. (2011). A systematic review of propensity score methods in the social sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(1), 90–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.540475. (publishedOnlineFirst:2011/02/07). CrossRefPubMed

38.

Prentice, R. L., Kalbfleisch, J. D., Peterson, A. V., Jr., et al. (1978). The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics, 34(4), 541–554. (published Online First: 1978/12/01). CrossRefPubMed

39.

Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American statistical association, 94(446), 496–509. CrossRef

40.

Vaccarino, V., Badimon, L., Bremner, J. D., et al. (2019). Depression and coronary heart disease: 2018 position paper of the ESC working group on coronary pathophysiology and microcirculation. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy913. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Xiao, Y., Li, W., Zhou, J., et al. (2019). Impact of depression and/or anxiety on patients with percutaneous coronary interventions after acute coronary syndrome: a protocol for a real-world prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal Open, 9(9), e027964. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027964. (publishedOnlineFirst:2019/09/08). CrossRef

42.

Berg, S. K., Rasmussen, T. B., Herning, M., et al. (2019). Cognitive behavioural therapy significantly reduces anxiety in patients with implanted cardioverter defibrillator compared with usual care: Findings from the Screen-ICD randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487319874147. (published Online First: 2019/10/03). CrossRefPubMed

43.

Borregaard, B., Pedersen, S. S., Berg, S. K., et al. (2019). What to expect after open heart valve surgery? Changes in health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02400-9. (publishedOnlineFirst:2019/12/26). CrossRefPubMed

44.

Borregaard, B., Sorensen, J., Ekholm, O., et al. (2018). Sociodemographic, clinical and patient-reported outcomes and readmission after heart valve surgery. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 27(1), 78–86. (published Online First: 2018/12/19). PubMed

45.

Berg, S. K., Thorup, C. B., Borregaard, B., et al. (2019). Patient-reported outcomes are independent predictors of one-year mortality and cardiac events across cardiac diagnoses: findings from the national DenHeart survey. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 26(6), 624–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487318769766. (publishedOnlineFirst:2018/04/12). CrossRefPubMed

46.

Vamosi, M., Lauberg, A., Borregaard, B., et al. (2019). Patient-reported outcomes predict high readmission rates among patients with cardiac diagnoses. Findings from the DenHeart study. International Journal of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.046. (published Online First: 2019/11/22). CrossRefPubMed

47.

Zhang, W. Y., Nan, N., Song, X. T., et al. (2019). Impact of depression on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal Open, 9(8), e026445. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026445. (publishedOnlineFirst:2019/08/23). CrossRef

48.

Berg, S. K., Rasmussen, T. B., Thrysoee, L., et al. (2017). DenHeart: differences in physical and mental health across cardiac diagnoses at hospital discharge. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 94, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.01.003. (publishedOnlineFirst:2017/02/12). CrossRefPubMed

49.

Munyombwe, T., Hall, M., Dondo, T. B., et al. (2020). Quality of life trajectories in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: a national longitudinal study. Heart, 106(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315510. (publishedOnlineFirst:2019/11/09). CrossRefPubMed

Titel: The association between self-reported health status and adverse events: a comparison among coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Auteurs: Stine Nørris Nielsen
Trine Bernholdt Rasmussen
Jens Flensted Lassen
Selina Kikkenborg Berg
Lars Thrysoee
Jacob Eifer Møller
Lisette Okkels Jensen
Anne Langhoff Thuesen
Anne Vinggaard Christensen
Ola Ekholm
Rikke Mols
Charlotte Brun Thorup
Britt Borregaard
Publicatiedatum: 28-08-2020
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02573-8

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical trial registration

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 11/2020

Health-related quality of life and physical activity level after a behavior change program at Norwegian healthy life centers: a 15-month follow-up

Can survey data facilitate local priority setting? Experience from the Igunga and Nzega districts in Tanzania

Known-groups validity and responsiveness to change of the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS vs. 2.0): a patient-reported measure of treatment burden

Effects of spiritual resilience on psychological distress and health-related quality of life in Chinese people with Parkinson’s disease

How the EQ-5D utilities are derived matters in Chinese diabetes patients: a comparison based on different EQ-5D scoring functions for China

Health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury: deriving value sets for the QOLIBRI-OS for Italy, The Netherlands and The United Kingdom