Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel Quality of Life for 19,114 participants in the ...

volgende artikel Trials with proxy-reported outcomes registered ...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

10-12-2018 | Uitgave 4/2019

The association between life satisfaction, vitality, self-rated health, and risk of cancer

Tijdschrift:: Quality of Life Research > Uitgave 4/2019

Auteurs:: Anna Paldam Folker, Emilie Rune Hegelund, Erik Lykke Mortensen, Cathrine Lawaetz Wimmelmann, Trine Flensborg-Madsen

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Purpose

Only few prospective studies have been conducted on the contribution of quality of life-related factors to the risk of cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the prospective associations of three quality of life-related factors with the risk of cancer; life satisfaction, vitality, and self-rated health.

Methods

In 2009–2011, 7189 participants in the Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank were asked to rate their life satisfaction, their vitality, and their health. The study population was followed until the end of 2015 for registration of cancer in the Danish National Patient Register.

Results

During the follow-up period, cancer was diagnosed in 312 individuals. Life satisfaction was not associated with the risk of cancer. Vitality was significantly associated with the risk of cancer, but the association became non-significant after adjustment for age, sex, socioeconomic position, and lifestyle factors. However, when additionally adjusting for life satisfaction, individuals who rated their vitality as low had a hazard ratio of 1.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–2.07) for the development of cancer. Individuals who rated their health as poor had a hazard ratio of 1.70 (95% CI 1.27–2.26) for the development of cancer, compared with individuals with good, very good, or excellent self-rated health. The association remained significant after adjustment for basic confounders, life satisfaction, and vitality.

Conclusion

A better grasp of the significance of quality of life-related factors for the risk of cancer may be of great importance to population-based cancer prevention that aims to target early risk factors for development of cancer across widespread cancer sites.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Meer informatie

Garssen, B. (2004). Psychological factors and cancer development: Evidence after 30 years of research. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(3), 315–338. CrossRefPubMed

Dalton, S. O., et al. (2002). Mind and cancer. do psychological factors cause cancer? European Journal of Cancer, 38(10), 1313–1323. CrossRefPubMed

Chiriac, V. F., Baban, A., & Dumitrascu, D. L. (2018). Psychological stress and breast cancer incidence: A systematic review. Clujul Medical, 91(1), 18–26. PubMedPubMedCentral

Santos, M. C. L., et al. (2009). Association between stress and breast cancer in women: A meta-analysis. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 25, S453–S463. CrossRefPubMed

Edelman, S. (2005). Relationship between psychological factors and cancer: An update of the evidence. Clinical Psychologist, 9(2), 45–53. CrossRef

Duijts, S. F., Zeegers, M., & Borne, B. V. (2003). The association between stressful life events and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Cancer, 107(6), 1023–1029. CrossRefPubMed

Nielsen, N. R., & Gronbaek, M. (2006). Stress and breast cancer: A systematic update on the current knowledge. Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 3(11), 612–620. CrossRefPubMed

Chida, Y., et al. (2008). Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival? Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 5(8), 466–475. CrossRefPubMed

Coyne, J. C., Ranchor, A. V., & Palmer, S. C. Meta-analysis of stress-related factors in cancer. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2010. 7(5).

10.

Lemogne, C., et al. (2013). Depression and the risk of cancer: A 15-year follow-up study of the GAZEL cohort. American Journal of Epidemiology, 178(12), 1712–1720. CrossRefPubMed

11.

Hamer, M., Chida, Y., & Molloy, G. J. (2009). Psychological distress and cancer mortality. Journal Psychosomatic Research, 66(3), 255–258. CrossRef

12.

Bergelt, C., et al. (2005). Vital exhaustion and risk for cancer: A prospective cohort study on the association between depressive feelings, fatigue, and risk of cancer. Cancer, 104(6), 1288–1295. CrossRefPubMed

13.

Flensborg-Madsen, T., et al. (2011). A prospective association between quality of life and risk for cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 47(16), 2446–2452. CrossRefPubMed

14.

Roelsgaard, I. K., et al. (2016). Self-rated health and cancer risk—A prospective cohort study among Danish women. Acta Oncology, 55(9–10), 1204–1209. CrossRef

15.

Benyamini, Y. (2011). Why does self-rated health predict mortality? An update on current knowledge and a research agenda for psychologists. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.

16.

Latham, K., & Peek, C. W. (2013). Self-rated health and morbidity onset among late midlife U.S. adults. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Science, 68(1), 107–116. CrossRef

17.

Pijls, L. T., Feskens, E. J., & Kromhout, D. (1993). Self-rated health, mortality, and chronic diseases in elderly men. The Zutphen Study, 1985–1990. The American Journal of Epidemiology, 138(10), 840–848. CrossRefPubMed

18.

Riise, H. K., et al. (2014). Poor self-rated health associated with an increased risk of subsequent development of lung cancer. Quality of Life Research, 23(1), 145–153. CrossRefPubMed

19.

Topp, C. W., et al. (2015). The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A systematic review of the literature. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84(3), 167–176. CrossRefPubMed

20.

Ware, J. E. Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483. CrossRefPubMed

21.

Bjorner, J. B., et al. (1998). Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the Danish SF-36. The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1001–1011. CrossRefPubMed

22.

Lins, L., & Carvalho, F. M. (2016). SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: Scoping review. SAGE Open Medicine, 4, 2050312116671725. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Maynard, S., et al. (2015). Associations of subjective vitality with DNA damage, cardiovascular risk factors and physical performance. Acta Physiologica, 213(1), 156–170. CrossRefPubMed

24.

Bjorner, J. B., et al. (2007). Interpreting score differences in the SF-36 Vitality scale: Using clinical conditions and functional outcomes to define the minimally important difference. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 23(4), 731–739. CrossRefPubMed

25.

Shirom, A. (2011). Vigor as a positive affect at work: Conceptualizing vigor, its relations with related constructs, and its antecedents and consequences. Review of General Psychology, 15(1), 50. CrossRef

26.

Shirom, A., et al. (2010). Vigor, anxiety, and depressive symptoms as predictors of changes in fibrinogen and C-reactive protein. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2(3), 251–271.

27.

Shirom, A., et al. (2013). Burnout and vigor as predictors of the incidence of hyperlipidemia among healthy employees. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 5(1), 79–98.

28.

Osler, M., et al. (2006). Cohort profile: The Metropolit 1953 Danish male birth cohort. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35(3), 541–545. CrossRefPubMed

29.

Christensen, U., et al. (2004). Cynical hostility, socioeconomic position, health behaviors, and symptom load: A cross-sectional analysis in a Danish population-based study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(4), 572–577. CrossRefPubMed

30.

Zachau-Christiansen, B., & Ross, E. M. (1975). Babies: Human development during the first year. New York: John Wiley.

31.

Lund, R., et al. (2016). Cohort profile: The copenhagen aging and midlife biobank (CAMB). International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(4), 1044–1053. PubMed

32.

Diener, E., et al. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. CrossRefPubMed

33.

Pavot, W., et al. (1991). Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57(1), 149–161. CrossRefPubMed

34.

Neuberger, G. B. (2003). Measures of fatigue: The fatigue questionnaire, fatigue severity scale, multidimensional assessment of fatigue scale, and short form-36 vitality (energy/fatigue) subscale of the short form health survey. Arthritis Care & Research: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology, 49(S5), S175–S183. CrossRef

35.

Bech, P., et al. (2003). Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: A comparison of the SF-36 Mental Health subscale and the WHO-Five well-being scale. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 12(2), 85–91. CrossRefPubMed

36.

Bjorner, J. B., et al. (1998). The Danish SF-36 Health Survey: Translation and preliminary validity studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 991–999. CrossRefPubMed

37.

Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 21–37.

38.

Jurgensen, H. J., et al. (1986). Registration of diagnoses in the Danish National Registry of Patients. Methods of Information in Medicine, 25(3), 158–164. CrossRefPubMed

39.

Pedersen, C. B. (2011). The Danish civil registration system. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39(7_suppl), 22–25. CrossRefPubMed

40.

Benyamini, Y., et al. (2011). Changes over time from baseline poor self-rated health: For whom does poor self-rated health not predict mortality? Psychology & Health, 26(11), 1446–1462. CrossRef

41.

Potischman, N., Troisi, R., & Vatten, L. (2004). A life course approach to cancer epidemiology. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology (pp. 260–280). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

42.

van der Linden, B. W., et al., Effect of childhood socioeconomic conditions on cancer onset in later life: An ambidirectional cohort study. International Journal of Public Health, 2018: p. 1–12.

43.

Lynge, E., Madsen, M., & Engholm, G. (1989). Effect of organized screening on incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in Denmark. Cancer Research, 49(8), 2157–2160. PubMed

44.

Olsen, A. H., et al. (2005). Breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen after introduction of mammography screening: Cohort study. BMJ, 330(7485), 220. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Kronborg, O., et al. (1996). Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. The Lancet, 348(9040), 1467–1471. CrossRef

46.

Ruthig, J. C., et al. (2011). Later life health optimism, pessimism and realism: Psychosocial contributors and health correlates. Psychology & Health, 26(7), 835–853. CrossRef

47.

Ruthig, J. C., Chipperfield, J. G., & Payne, B. J. (2011). A five-year study of older adults’ health incongruence: Consistency, functional changes and subsequent survival. Psychology & Health, 26(11), 1463–1478. CrossRef

48.

Prior, K. N., & Bond, M. J. (2010). New dimensions of abnormal illness behaviour derived from the illness behaviour questionnaire. Psychology and Health, 25(10), 1209–1227. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: The association between life satisfaction, vitality, self-rated health, and risk of cancer
Auteurs:: Anna Paldam Folker
Emilie Rune Hegelund
Erik Lykke Mortensen
Cathrine Lawaetz Wimmelmann
Trine Flensborg-Madsen
Publicatiedatum: 10-12-2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2083-1
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Tijdschrift: Quality of Life Research An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation - An Official Journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research
Uitgave 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

The association between life satisfaction, vitality, self-rated health, and risk of cancer

Publisher’s Note

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Publisher’s Note

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2019

SF-36 normative values according to level of functioning in older women

Individualized health-related quality of life instrument Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP) and its adaptations: a critical appraisal

The weight-specific adolescent instrument for economic evaluation (WAItE): psychometric evaluation using a Rasch model approach

Pain, skin sensations symptoms, and cognitive functioning predictors of health-related quality of life in pediatric patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Defining the cut-off point of clinically significant postoperative fatigue in three common fatigue scales

Body Mass Index, waist circumference, and health-related quality of life in adults with chronic kidney disease