Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) research has typically adopted either a formative approach, in which HRQoL is the common effect of its observables, or a reflective approach—defining HRQoL as a latent variable that determines observable characteristics of HRQoL. Both approaches, however, do not take into account the complex organization of these characteristics. The objective of this study was to introduce a new approach for analyzing HRQoL data, namely a network model (NM). An NM, as opposed to traditional research strategies, accounts for interactions among observables and offers a complementary analytic approach.
We applied the NM to samples of Dutch cancer patients (N = 485) and Dutch healthy adults (N = 1742) who completed the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Networks were constructed for both samples separately and for a combined sample with diagnostic status added as an extra variable. We assessed the network structures and compared the structures of the two separate samples on the item and domain levels. The relative importance of individual items in the network structures was determined using centrality analyses.
We found that the global structure of the SF-36 is dominant in all networks, supporting the validity of questionnaire’s subscales. Furthermore, results suggest that the network structure of both samples was highly similar. Centrality analyses revealed that maintaining a daily routine despite one’s physical health predicts HRQoL levels best.
We concluded that the NM provides a fruitful alternative to classical approaches used in the psychometric analysis of HRQoL data.
Wright, S. (1971). Path coefficients and path regressions: alternative or complementary concepts? In H. M. Blalock Jr (Ed.), Causal models in the social sciences. Chicago, USA: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
Borsboom, D., & Markus, K. (2013). Truth and evidence in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 110–114. CrossRef
Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–314. CrossRef
Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Fayers, P. M., & Hand, D. J. (1997). Factor analysis, causal indicators and quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 6, 139–150. PubMed
Koller, D., & Friedman, N. (2009). Probabilistic graphical models: principles and techniques. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
Cramer, A. O. J., Sluis, S., Noordhof, A., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Aggen, S. H., et al. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can’t like parties if you don’t like people. European Journal of Personality, 26, 414–431. CrossRef
Whittaker, J. (1990). Graphical models in applied multivariate statistics. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Aaronson, N. K., Muller, M., Cohen, P. D. A., Essink-Bot, M.-L., Fekkes, M., Sanderman, R., et al. (1998). Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1055–1068. CrossRefPubMed
Ware, J. E, Jr, Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A user’s manual. Boston, USA: The Health Institute.
Newman, M. (2009). Networks: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lauritzen, S. L., & Wermuth, N. (1989). Graphical models for associations between variables, some of which are qualitative and some quantitative. The Annals of Statistics, 17, 31–57. CrossRef
Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 58, 267–288.
Foygel, R., & Drton, M. (2010). Extended Bayesian information criteria for Gaussian graphical models. In J. D. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. S. Zemel, & A. Culotta (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 23 (pp. 604–612). USA: Curran Associates, Inc.
Costantini, G., Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., Perugini, M., Mõttus, R., Waldorp, L. J., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2015). State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 13–29.
Borkulo van, C. D., Waldorp, L. J., Boschloo, L., Schoevers, R. A., & Borsboom, D. (2015). Statistical comparison of two networks with respect to global strength. Retrieved from https://github.com/cvborkulo/NetworkComparisonTest.
Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32, 245–251. CrossRef
Zhao, T., Liu, H., Roeder, K., Lafferty, J., & Wasserman, L. (2014). Huge: High-dimensional undirected graph estimation. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=huge.
Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., & Borsboom, D. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i04/.
Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience, 21, 1129–1164.
Ware, J. E, Jr, Gandek, B., Kosinski, M., Aaronson, N. K., Apolone, G., Brazier, J. E., et al. (1998). The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1167–1170. CrossRefPubMed
Marsman, M., Maris, G., Bechger, T., & Glas, C. (2015). Bayesian inference for low-rank Ising networks. Scientific Reports, 5, 1–7. CrossRef
- The application of a network approach to Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): introducing a new method for assessing HRQoL in healthy adults and cancer patients
Jolanda J. Kossakowski
Jacobien M. Kieffer
Claudia D. van Borkulo
- Springer International Publishing