Top

Gepubliceerd in:

03-02-2022 | Original Article

The angry versus happy recognition advantage: the role of emotional and physical properties

Auteurs: Filipa Barros, Sandra C. Soares, Marta Rocha, Pedro Bem-Haja, Samuel Silva, Daniel Lundqvist

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2023

Abstract

Facial emotional expressions are pivotal for social communication. Their fast and accurate recognition is crucial to promote adaptive responses to social demands, for the development of functional relationships, and for well-being. However, the literature has been inconsistent in showing differentiated recognition patterns for positive vs. negative facial expressions (e.g., happy and angry expressions, respectively), likely due to affective and perceptual factors. Accordingly, the present study explored differences in recognition performance between angry and happy faces, while specifically assessing the role of emotional intensity and global/regional low-level visual features. 98 participants categorized angry and happy faces morphed between neutral and emotional across 9 levels of expression intensity (10–90%). We observed a significantly higher recognition efficiency (higher accuracy and shorter response latencies) for angry compared to happy faces in lower levels of expression intensity, suggesting that our cognitive resources are biased to prioritize the recognition of potentially harmful stimuli, especially when briefly presented at an ambiguous stage of expression. Conversely, an advantage for happy faces was observed from the midpoint of expression intensity, regarding response speed. However, when compensating for the contribution of regional low-level properties of distinct facial key regions, the effect of emotion was maintained only for response accuracy. Altogether, these results shed new light on the processing of facial emotional stimuli, emphasizing the need to consider emotional intensity and regional low-level image properties in emotion recognition analysis.

vorige artikel Sourness impacts envy and jealousy in Chinese culture

volgende artikel The experiential basis of compatibility effects in reading-by-rotating paradigms

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

References of the included faces: AF06, AF09, AF14, AF16, AF20, AM08, AM10, AM11, AM17, AM31.

Baltrusaitis, T., Zadeh, A., Lim, Y. C., & Morency, L. P. (2018). OpenFace 2.0: Facial behavior analysis toolkit. In Proceedings—13th IEEE international conference on automatic face and gesture recognition, pp. 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/FG.2018.00019

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497CrossRef

Beaudry, O., Roy-Charland, A., Perron, M., Cormier, I., & Tapp, R. (2014). Featural processing in recognition of emotional facial expressions. Cognition and Emotion, 28(3), 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.833500CrossRef

Becker, D. V., Anderson, U. S., Mortensen, C. R., Neufeld, S. L., & Neel, R. (2011). The face in the crowd effect unconfounded: Happy faces, not angry faces, are more efficiently detected in single- and multiple-target visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 637–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024060CrossRef

Bombari, D., Schmid, P. C., Schmid Mast, M., Birri, S., Mast, F. W., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2013). Emotion recognition: The role of featural and configural face information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(12), 2426–2442. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.789065CrossRef

Calvo, M. G., Álvarez-Plaza, P., & Fernández-Martín, A. (2017). The contribution of facial regions to judgements of happiness and trustworthiness from dynamic expressions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29(5), 618–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2017.1302450CrossRef

Calvo, M. G., Avero, P., Fernández-Martín, A., & Recio, G. (2016). Recognition thresholds for static and dynamic emotional faces. Emotion, 16(8), 1186–1200. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000192CrossRef

Calvo, M. G., Avero, P., & Lundqvist, D. (2006). Facilitated detection of angry faces: Initial orienting and processing efficiency. Cognition and Emotion, 20(6), 785–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930500465224CrossRef

Calvo, M. G., & Beltrán, D. (2013). Recognition advantage of happy faces: Tracing the neurocognitive processes. Neuropsychologia, 51(11), 2051–2061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.010CrossRef

Calvo, M. G., Fernández-Martín, A., & Nummenmaa, L. (2012). Perceptual, categorical, and affective processing of ambiguous smiling facial expressions. Cognition, 125(3), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.021CrossRef

Calvo, M. G., Fernández-Martín, A., & Nummenmaa, L. (2014). Facial expression recognition in peripheral versus central vision: Role of the eyes and the mouth. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 78(2), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0492-xCrossRef

Calvo, M. G., Gutiérrez-García, A., Fernández-Martín, A., & Nummenmaa, L. (2014). Recognition of facial expressions of emotion is related to their frequency in everyday life. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38(4), 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-014-0191-3CrossRef

Calvo, M. G., & Lundqvist, D. (2008). Facial expressions of emotion (KDEF): Identification under different display-duration conditions. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.109CrossRef

Calvo, M. G., & Marrero, H. (2009). Visual search of emotional faces: The role of affective content and featural distinctiveness. Cognition and Emotion, 23(4), 782–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802151654CrossRef

Calvo, M. G., & Nummenmaa, L. (2008). Detection of emotional faces: Salient physical features guide effective visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(3), 471–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012771CrossRef

Calvo, M. G., & Nummenmaa, L. (2016). Perceptual and affective mechanisms in facial expression recognition: An integrative review. Cognition and Emotion, 30(6), 1081–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1049124CrossRef

Cohen, J. A. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dobs, K., Bülthoff, I., & Schultz, J. (2018). Use and usefulness of dynamic face stimuli for face perception studies—a review of behavioral findings and methodology. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01355CrossRef

Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3–4), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068CrossRef

Ekman, P., & Cordaro, D. (2011). What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emotion Review, 3(4), 364–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911410740CrossRef

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2003). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. ISHK.

Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2008). Social functions of emotion. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions pp 456–468. Berlin: The Guilford Press.

Fridlund, A. J. (1994). Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. Academic Press Inc.

Garrido, M. V., & Prada, M. (2017). KDEF-PT: Valence, emotional intensity, familiarity and attractiveness ratings of angry, neutral, and happy faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02181CrossRef

Glas, A. S., Lijmer, J. G., Prins, M. H., Bonsel, G. J., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2003). The diagnostic odds ratio: A single indicator of test performance. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(11), 1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00177-XCrossRef

Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(3), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1038/35058500CrossRef

Juth, P., Lundqvist, D., Karlsson, A., & Öhman, A. (2005). Looking for foes and friends: Perceptual and emotional factors when finding a face in the crowd. Emotion, 5(4), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.379CrossRef

Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (1998). Emotion, social function, and psychopathology. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 320–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.320CrossRef

Kirita, T., & Endo, M. (1995). Happy face advantage in recognizing facial expressions. Acta Psychologica, 89(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(94)00021-8CrossRef

Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces (KDEF). ClCD ROM from Department of Cinical Neuroscience, Psychology Section, Karolinska Institutet, 91, 630.

Lundqvist, D., Juth, P., & Öhman, A. (2014). Using facial emotional stimuli in visual search experiments: The arousal factor explains contradictory results. Cognition and Emotion, 28(6), 1012–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.867479CrossRef

Lundqvist, D., Bruce, N., & Öhman, A. (2015). Finding an emotional face in a crowd: Emotional and perceptual stimulus factors influence visual search efficiency. Cognition and Emotion, 29(4), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.927352CrossRef

Mendolia, M. (2007). Explicit use of categorical and dimensional strategies to decode facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 31(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-006-0020-4CrossRef

Menzel, C., Redies, C., & Hayn-Leichsenring, G. U. (2018). Low-level image properties in facial expressions. Acta Psychologica, 188, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.05.012CrossRef

Neath, K. N., & Itier, R. J. (2014). Facial expression discrimination varies with presentation time but not with fixation on features: A backward masking study using eye-tracking. Cognition and Emotion, 28(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.812557CrossRef

Niedenthal, P. M., & Brauer, M. (2012). Social functionality of human emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131605CrossRef

Nummenmaa, L., & Calvo, M. G. (2015). Dissociation between recognition and detection advantage for facial expressions: A meta-analysis. Emotion, 15(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000042CrossRef

Öhman, A., Juth, P., & Lundqvist, D. (2010). Finding the face in a crowd: Relationships between distractor redundancy, target emotion, and target gender. Cognition and Emotion, 24(7), 1216–1228. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903166882CrossRef

Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.381CrossRef

Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108(3), 483–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483CrossRef

Öhman, A., Soares, S. C., Juth, P., Lindström, B., & Esteves, F. (2012). Evolutionary derived modulations of attention to two common fear stimuli: Serpents and hostile humans. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.629603CrossRef

Palermo, R., & Coltheart, M. (2004). Photographs of facial expression: Accuracy, response times, and ratings of intensity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 634–638. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206544CrossRef

Panksepp, J., & Watt, D. (2011). What is basic about basic emotions? Lasting lessons from affective neuroscience. Emotion Review, 3(4), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911410741CrossRef

Pinkham, A. E., Griffin, M., Baron, R., Sasson, N. J., & Gur, R. C. (2010). The face in the crowd effect: Anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities. Emotion, 10(1), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017387CrossRef

Reynolds, J. H., & Desimone, R. (2003). Interacting roles of attention and visual salience in V4. Neuron, 37(5), 853–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00097-7CrossRef

Šimundić, A.-M. (2009). Measures of diagnostic accuracy: Basic definitions. EJIFCC, 19(4), 203–211. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683318

Smith, M. L., Cottrell, G. W., Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2005). Transmitting and decoding facial expressions. Psychological Science, 16(3), 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00801.xCrossRef

Vuilleumier, P. (2005). How brains beware: Neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(12), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011CrossRef

Webb, A. L. M., Hibbard, P. B., & O’Gorman, R. (2020). Contrast normalisation masks natural expression-related differences and artificially enhances the perceived salience of fear expressions. PLoS ONE, 15(6), e0234513. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234513CrossRef

Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6), 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1411CrossRef

Youden, W. J. (1950). Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer, 3(1), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1%3c32::AID-CNCR2820030106%3e3.0.CO;2-3CrossRef

Titel: The angry versus happy recognition advantage: the role of emotional and physical properties
Auteurs: Filipa Barros
Sandra C. Soares
Marta Rocha
Pedro Bem-Haja
Samuel Silva
Daniel Lundqvist
Publicatiedatum: 03-02-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01648-0

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2023

Response-code conflict in dual-task interference and its modulation by age

Diagnosing eyewitness identifications with reaction time-based concealed information test: the effect of observation time

The contribution of temporal analysis of pupillometry measurements to cognitive research

Similar proactive effect monitoring in free and forced choice action modes

Correction to: Individual differences in dimensions of mind wandering: the mediating role of emotional valence and intentionality

Embodiment and repeated exposure do not suffice for abstract concepts acquisition: evidence from tonal music cognition