Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 3/2009

01-04-2009

The 6-item CTS symptoms scale: a brief outcomes measure for carpal tunnel syndrome

Auteurs: Isam Atroshi, Per-Erik Lyrén, Christina Gummesson

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2009

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Objective

To develop a psychometrically appropriate brief symptoms measure of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Methods

Preoperative CTS 11-item symptom severity and 8-item functional status scales from 693 patients (71% women) with CTS were subjected to exploratory factor analysis and item response theory (IRT) analysis yielding a revised CTS symptoms scale. A validation sample of 213 patients (68% women) with CTS completed the 11-item disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH), and the revised symptoms scale and 116 patients also completed the original CTS symptom severity scale (median interval 11 days).

Results

Of the 11 CTS symptom severity scale items, 2 items that on factor analysis associated with the functional status items were removed. After IRT recalibrations of the remaining symptom severity scale items, 2 non-fitting items were removed and 2 items were merged creating the 6-item CTS symptoms scale. Factor analysis showed one dominant factor explaining 58% of the variance. Reliability was high (Cronbach alpha = 0.86; IRT person separation reliability = 0.88). No item displayed significant differential item functioning. The 6-item CTS symptoms scale showed strong correlation with the QuickDASH (r = 0.70) and agreement with the original symptom severity scale (ICC = 0.80).

Conclusion

The 6-item CTS symptoms scale has good reliability and validity and can be used to measure symptom severity and treatment outcome in CTS.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
5.
go back to reference Levine, D. W., Simmons, B. P., Koris, M. J., Daltroy, L. H., Hohl, G. G., Fossel, A. H., et al. (1993). A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 75, 1585–1592. PubMed Levine, D. W., Simmons, B. P., Koris, M. J., Daltroy, L. H., Hohl, G. G., Fossel, A. H., et al. (1993). A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 75, 1585–1592. PubMed
6.
go back to reference Atroshi, I., Johnsson, R., & Sprinchorn, A. (1998). Self-administered outcome instrument in carpal tunnel syndrome: reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluated in 102 patients. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 69, 82–88. PubMedCrossRef Atroshi, I., Johnsson, R., & Sprinchorn, A. (1998). Self-administered outcome instrument in carpal tunnel syndrome: reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluated in 102 patients. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 69, 82–88. PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mondelli, M., Reale, F., Sicurelli, F., & Padua, L. (2000). Relationship between the self-administered Boston questionnaire and electrophysiological findings in follow-up of surgically-treated carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery (Edinburgh, Lothian), 25, 128–134. doi: 10.​1054/​jhsb.​2000.​0361. Mondelli, M., Reale, F., Sicurelli, F., & Padua, L. (2000). Relationship between the self-administered Boston questionnaire and electrophysiological findings in follow-up of surgically-treated carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery (Edinburgh, Lothian), 25, 128–134. doi: 10.​1054/​jhsb.​2000.​0361.
8.
go back to reference Rosales, R. S., Delgado, E. B., & Diez de la Lastra-Bosch, I. (2002). Evaluation of the Spanish version of the DASH and carpal tunnel syndrome health-related quality-of-life instruments: cross-cultural adaptation process and reliability. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 27, 334–343. doi: 10.​1053/​jhsu.​2002.​30059. PubMedCrossRef Rosales, R. S., Delgado, E. B., & Diez de la Lastra-Bosch, I. (2002). Evaluation of the Spanish version of the DASH and carpal tunnel syndrome health-related quality-of-life instruments: cross-cultural adaptation process and reliability. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 27, 334–343. doi: 10.​1053/​jhsu.​2002.​30059. PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Imaeda, T., Uchiyama, S., Toh, S., Wada, T., Okinaga, S., Sawaizumi, T., et al. (2007). Validation of the Japanese Society for surgery of the hand version of the carpal tunnel syndrome instrument. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 12, 14–21. doi: 10.​1007/​s00776-006-1087-9. PubMedCrossRef Imaeda, T., Uchiyama, S., Toh, S., Wada, T., Okinaga, S., Sawaizumi, T., et al. (2007). Validation of the Japanese Society for surgery of the hand version of the carpal tunnel syndrome instrument. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 12, 14–21. doi: 10.​1007/​s00776-006-1087-9. PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
go back to reference Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
go back to reference Gummesson, C., Ward, M. M., & Atroshi, I. (2006). The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): Validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 7, 44. doi: 10.​1186/​1471-2474-7-44. PubMedCrossRef Gummesson, C., Ward, M. M., & Atroshi, I. (2006). The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): Validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 7, 44. doi: 10.​1186/​1471-2474-7-44. PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. doi: 10.​2307/​2290157. CrossRef Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. doi: 10.​2307/​2290157. CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 88–91. PubMed Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 88–91. PubMed
22.
go back to reference Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
24.
go back to reference Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189. Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189.
25.
go back to reference Benson, J., & Fleishman, J. A. (1994). The robustness of maximum likelihood and distribution-free estimators to non-normality in confirmatory factor analysis. Quality & Quantity, 28, 117–136. doi: 10.​1007/​BF01102757. CrossRef Benson, J., & Fleishman, J. A. (1994). The robustness of maximum likelihood and distribution-free estimators to non-normality in confirmatory factor analysis. Quality & Quantity, 28, 117–136. doi: 10.​1007/​BF01102757. CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7, 557–595. CrossRef Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7, 557–595. CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossRef Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Applications of item response theory to improve health outcomes assessment: Developing item banks, linking instruments, and computer-adaptive testing. In J. Lipscomb, C. C. Gotay, & C. Snyder (Eds.), Outcomes assessment in cancer (pp. 445–464). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Applications of item response theory to improve health outcomes assessment: Developing item banks, linking instruments, and computer-adaptive testing. In J. Lipscomb, C. C. Gotay, & C. Snyder (Eds.), Outcomes assessment in cancer (pp. 445–464). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
go back to reference Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research. (Reprinted by University of Chicago Press, 1980). Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research. (Reprinted by University of Chicago Press, 1980).
31.
go back to reference Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. (2007). ConQuest: Generalized Item Response Modeling Software. Hawthorn, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. (2007). ConQuest: Generalized Item Response Modeling Software. Hawthorn, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).
32.
go back to reference Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press. Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.
34.
go back to reference Shepard, L. A. (1985). Identifying bias in test items. In B. F. Green (Ed.), New directions in testing and measurement: Issues in testing–Coaching, disclosure, and test bias (pp. 79–104). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Shepard, L. A. (1985). Identifying bias in test items. In B. F. Green (Ed.), New directions in testing and measurement: Issues in testing–Coaching, disclosure, and test bias (pp. 79–104). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
go back to reference Spies-Dorgelo, M. N., Terwee, C. B., Stalman, W. A., & van der Windt, D. A. (2006). Reproducibility and responsiveness of the symptom severity scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 87. doi: 10.​1186/​1477-7525-4-87. PubMedCrossRef Spies-Dorgelo, M. N., Terwee, C. B., Stalman, W. A., & van der Windt, D. A. (2006). Reproducibility and responsiveness of the symptom severity scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 87. doi: 10.​1186/​1477-7525-4-87. PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Atroshi, I., Larsson, G. U., Ornstein, E., Hofer, M., Johnsson, R., & Ranstam, J. (2006). Outcomes of endoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome among employed patients: Randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 332, 1473–1476. doi: 10.​1136/​bmj.​38863.​632789.​1F. PubMedCrossRef Atroshi, I., Larsson, G. U., Ornstein, E., Hofer, M., Johnsson, R., & Ranstam, J. (2006). Outcomes of endoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome among employed patients: Randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 332, 1473–1476. doi: 10.​1136/​bmj.​38863.​632789.​1F. PubMedCrossRef
39.
40.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston: New England Medical Center. Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston: New England Medical Center.
41.
go back to reference Katz, J. N., Keller, R. B., Simmons, B. P., Rogers, W. D., Bessette, L., Fossel, A. H., et al. (1998). Maine carpal tunnel study: Outcomes of operative and nonoperative therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome in a community-based cohort. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 23, 697–710. doi: 10.​1016/​S0363-5023(98)80058-0. PubMedCrossRef Katz, J. N., Keller, R. B., Simmons, B. P., Rogers, W. D., Bessette, L., Fossel, A. H., et al. (1998). Maine carpal tunnel study: Outcomes of operative and nonoperative therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome in a community-based cohort. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 23, 697–710. doi: 10.​1016/​S0363-5023(98)80058-0. PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The 6-item CTS symptoms scale: a brief outcomes measure for carpal tunnel syndrome
Auteurs
Isam Atroshi
Per-Erik Lyrén
Christina Gummesson
Publicatiedatum
01-04-2009
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9449-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2009

Quality of Life Research 3/2009 Naar de uitgave