Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 3/2017

28-04-2016 | Original Article

That’s a good idea, but let’s keep thinking! Can we prevent our initial ideas from being forgotten as a consequence of thinking of new ideas?

Auteurs: Annie S. Ditta, Benjamin C. Storm

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Four experiments examined participants’ ability to remember their own ideas in a modified Alternative Uses Task. Participants were asked to generate uses for objects, and on half of the trials participants were then asked to think of more uses. Memory for the initial uses they generated was then tested via a cued-recall task. Results demonstrated that participants forgot their initial uses as a consequence of thinking of new uses (referred to as the thinking-induced forgetting effect), and this effect persisted even when participants chose the subset of uses they thought were the most creative and to be remembered. The only scenario in which uses were protected from forgetting was when they were required to use their uses as hints for generating more ideas. Together, these findings demonstrate that one’s own ideas are susceptible to forgetting when additional ideas must be generated, indicating that thinking is a modifier of memory despite one’s motivation to preserve their ideas.
Voetnoten
1
Although not a goal of the present research, it is interesting to note that the results of Experiment 1 do provide some evidence of selective directed forgetting (see e.g., Delaney, Nghiem, and Waldum, 2009; Storm, Koppel, & Wilson, 2013). Specifically, looking at baseline items alone, selected uses in the selection condition (M = 0.77, SE = 0.02) were recalled significantly better than were uses in the remember-all condition (M = 0.70, SE = 0.02), t(94) = 2.49, p = 0.01, d = 0.51, whereas non-selected uses in the selection condition (M = 0.62, SE = 0.02) were recalled significantly worse than uses in the remember-all condition, t(94) = 2.14, p = 0.04, d = 0.44. This result suggests that participants were able to selectively forget the subset of uses that were deemed non-creative/not-to-be-remembered while maintaining (and even increasing) the accessibility of the subset of uses that were deemed creative/to-be-remembered.
 
2
On average, when attempting to recall the initially generated uses related to a given object at the time of final test, participants recalled 0.15, 0.11, 0.18, and 0.12 of the uses they had generated during the additional thinking phases of Experiments 1, 2a, 2b, and 3, respectively. It is interesting to note that significant thinking-induced forgetting effects were observed in Experiments 1 and 2 (for selected and non-selected items) even when we limited our analysis to participants who, as determined by median split, made the fewest number of intrusions, all p values <0.05.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Anderson, M. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415–445.CrossRef Anderson, M. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415–445.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087.CrossRefPubMed Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Anderson, M. C., Green, C., & McCulloch, K. C. (2000). Similarity and inhibition in long-term memory: evidence for a two-factor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1141–1159.CrossRefPubMed Anderson, M. C., Green, C., & McCulloch, K. C. (2000). Similarity and inhibition in long-term memory: evidence for a two-factor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1141–1159.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Anderson, M. C., & McCulloch, K. C. (1999). Integration as a general boundary condition on retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 608–629.CrossRef Anderson, M. C., & McCulloch, K. C. (1999). Integration as a general boundary condition on retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 608–629.CrossRef
go back to reference Angello, G., Storm, B. C., & Smith, S. M. (2015). Overcoming fixation with repeated memory suppression. Memory, 23(3), 381–389.CrossRefPubMed Angello, G., Storm, B. C., & Smith, S. M. (2015). Overcoming fixation with repeated memory suppression. Memory, 23(3), 381–389.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Aslan, A., & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2011). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 264–269.CrossRefPubMed Aslan, A., & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2011). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 264–269.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: An experimental and social study. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: An experimental and social study. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
go back to reference Bäuml, K. H., & Hartinger, A. (2002). On the role of item similarity in retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory, 10(3), 215–224.CrossRefPubMed Bäuml, K. H., & Hartinger, A. (2002). On the role of item similarity in retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory, 10(3), 215–224.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bäuml, K. H. T., & Samenieh, A. (2010). The two faces of memory retrieval. Psychological Science, 21(6), 793–795.CrossRefPubMed Bäuml, K. H. T., & Samenieh, A. (2010). The two faces of memory retrieval. Psychological Science, 21(6), 793–795.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bertsch, S., Pesta, B. J., Wiscott, R., & McDaniel, M. A. (2007). The generation effect: a meta-analytic review. Memory & Cognition, 35(2), 201–210.CrossRef Bertsch, S., Pesta, B. J., Wiscott, R., & McDaniel, M. A. (2007). The generation effect: a meta-analytic review. Memory & Cognition, 35(2), 201–210.CrossRef
go back to reference Carroll, M., Campbell-Ratcliffe, J., Murnane, H., & Perfect, T. (2007). Retrieval-induced forgetting in educational contexts: monitoring, expertise, text integration, and test format. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4–5), 580–606.CrossRef Carroll, M., Campbell-Ratcliffe, J., Murnane, H., & Perfect, T. (2007). Retrieval-induced forgetting in educational contexts: monitoring, expertise, text integration, and test format. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4–5), 580–606.CrossRef
go back to reference Chan, J. C. K. (2009). When does retrieval induce forgetting and when does it induce facilitation? Implications for retrieval inhibition, testing effect, and text processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 153–170.CrossRef Chan, J. C. K. (2009). When does retrieval induce forgetting and when does it induce facilitation? Implications for retrieval inhibition, testing effect, and text processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 153–170.CrossRef
go back to reference Delaney, P. F., Nghiem, K., & Waldum, E. R. (2009). The selective directed forgetting effect: can people forget only part of a text? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1542–1550.CrossRef Delaney, P. F., Nghiem, K., & Waldum, E. R. (2009). The selective directed forgetting effect: can people forget only part of a text? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1542–1550.CrossRef
go back to reference Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–17.CrossRef Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Duncker, K., & Lees, L. S. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), i. Duncker, K., & Lees, L. S. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs58(5), i.
go back to reference Dunn, E. W., & Spellman, B. A. (2003). Forgetting by remembering: stereotype inhibition through rehearsal of alternative aspects of identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 420–433.CrossRef Dunn, E. W., & Spellman, B. A. (2003). Forgetting by remembering: stereotype inhibition through rehearsal of alternative aspects of identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 420–433.CrossRef
go back to reference Goodmon, L. B., & Anderson, M. C. (2011). Semantic integration as a boundary condition on inhibitory processes in episodic retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 416.CrossRefPubMed Goodmon, L. B., & Anderson, M. C. (2011). Semantic integration as a boundary condition on inhibitory processes in episodic retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 416.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability.
go back to reference Jonker, T. R., Seli, P., & MacLeod, C. M. (2013). Putting retrieval-induced forgetting in context: an inhibition-free, context-based account. Psychological Review, 120(4), 852–872.CrossRefPubMed Jonker, T. R., Seli, P., & MacLeod, C. M. (2013). Putting retrieval-induced forgetting in context: an inhibition-free, context-based account. Psychological Review, 120(4), 852–872.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kassam, K. S., Gilbert, D. T., Swencionis, J. K., & Wilson, T. D. (2009). Misconceptions of Memory: the Scooter Libby Effect. Psychological Science, 20(5), 551–552.CrossRefPubMed Kassam, K. S., Gilbert, D. T., Swencionis, J. K., & Wilson, T. D. (2009). Misconceptions of Memory: the Scooter Libby Effect. Psychological Science, 20(5), 551–552.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Koppel, R. H., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Escaping mental fixation: incubation and inhibition in creative problem solving. Memory, 22, 340–348.CrossRefPubMed Koppel, R. H., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Escaping mental fixation: incubation and inhibition in creative problem solving. Memory, 22, 340–348.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Loftus, G. R., & Wickens, T. D. (1970). Effect of incentive on storage and retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85(1), 141–147.CrossRef Loftus, G. R., & Wickens, T. D. (1970). Effect of incentive on storage and retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85(1), 141–147.CrossRef
go back to reference Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1959). Rigidity of behavior: A variational approach to the effect of Einstellung. Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1959). Rigidity of behavior: A variational approach to the effect of Einstellung.
go back to reference Macrae, C. N., & Roseveare, T. A. (2002). I was always on my mind: the self and temporary forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 611–614.CrossRef Macrae, C. N., & Roseveare, T. A. (2002). I was always on my mind: the self and temporary forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 611–614.CrossRef
go back to reference Migueles, M., & García-Bajos, E. (2007). Selective retrieval and induced forgetting in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(9), 1157–1172.CrossRef Migueles, M., & García-Bajos, E. (2007). Selective retrieval and induced forgetting in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(9), 1157–1172.CrossRef
go back to reference Murayama, K., Miyatsu, T., Buchli, D., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: a meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1383–1409.CrossRefPubMed Murayama, K., Miyatsu, T., Buchli, D., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: a meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1383–1409.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I., Gavrilescu, D., & Anderson, N. D. (2000). Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis. Memory & Cognition, 28(6), 965–976.CrossRef Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I., Gavrilescu, D., & Anderson, N. D. (2000). Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis. Memory & Cognition, 28(6), 965–976.CrossRef
go back to reference Raaijmakers, J. G., & Jakab, E. (2013). Rethinking inhibition theory: on the problematic status of the inhibition theory for forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(2), 98–122.CrossRef Raaijmakers, J. G., & Jakab, E. (2013). Rethinking inhibition theory: on the problematic status of the inhibition theory for forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(2), 98–122.CrossRef
go back to reference Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–164.CrossRef Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–164.CrossRef
go back to reference Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 773–786.CrossRef Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 773–786.CrossRef
go back to reference Schilling, C. J., Storm, B. C., & Anderson, M. C. (2014). Examining the costs and benefits of inhibition in memory retrieval. Cognition, 133(2), 358–370.CrossRefPubMed Schilling, C. J., Storm, B. C., & Anderson, M. C. (2014). Examining the costs and benefits of inhibition in memory retrieval. Cognition, 133(2), 358–370.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sio, U. N., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2015). Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes. Design Studies, 39, 70–99.CrossRef Sio, U. N., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2015). Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes. Design Studies, 39, 70–99.CrossRef
go back to reference Slamecka, N., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 14, 592–604. Slamecka, N., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 14, 592–604.
go back to reference Smith, S. M. (1995). Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 121–149). Cambridge: MIT Press. Smith, S. M. (1995). Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 121–149). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Smith, S. M. (2003). The constraining effects of initial ideas. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 15–31). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Smith, S. M. (2003). The constraining effects of initial ideas. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 15–31). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, S. M. (2008). Invisible assumptions and the unintentional use of knowledge and experiences in creative cognition. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 12, 509–525. Smith, S. M. (2008). Invisible assumptions and the unintentional use of knowledge and experiences in creative cognition. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 12, 509–525.
go back to reference Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1989). Incubation effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27(4), 311–314.CrossRef Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1989). Incubation effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27(4), 311–314.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. The American Journal of Psychology, 61–87. Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. The American Journal of Psychology, 61–87.
go back to reference Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (2000). The influence of distinctive processing on retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 28, 503–508.CrossRef Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (2000). The influence of distinctive processing on retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 28, 503–508.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, S. M., & Ward, T. B. (2012). Cognition and the creation of ideas. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 456–474). New York: Oxford University Press. Smith, S. M., & Ward, T. B. (2012). Cognition and the creation of ideas. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 456–474). New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition, 21(6), 837–845.CrossRef Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition, 21(6), 837–845.CrossRef
go back to reference Storm, B. C. (2011). The benefit of forgetting in thinking and remembering. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 291–295.CrossRef Storm, B. C. (2011). The benefit of forgetting in thinking and remembering. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 291–295.CrossRef
go back to reference Storm, B. C., & Angello, G. (2010). Overcoming fixation: creative problem solving and retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 21, 1263–1265.CrossRefPubMed Storm, B. C., & Angello, G. (2010). Overcoming fixation: creative problem solving and retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 21, 1263–1265.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Storm, B. C., Angello, G., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Thinking can cause forgetting: memory dynamics in creative problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1287–1293.CrossRefPubMed Storm, B. C., Angello, G., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Thinking can cause forgetting: memory dynamics in creative problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1287–1293.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Storm, B. C., Angello, G., Buchli, D. R., Koppel, R. H., Little, J. L., & Nestojko, J. F. (2015). A review of retrieval-induced forgetting in the contexts of learning, eye-witness memory, social cognition, autobiographical memory, and creative cognition. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 141–194. Storm, B. C., Angello, G., Buchli, D. R., Koppel, R. H., Little, J. L., & Nestojko, J. F. (2015). A review of retrieval-induced forgetting in the contexts of learning, eye-witness memory, social cognition, autobiographical memory, and creative cognition. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 141–194.
go back to reference Storm, B. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). When intended remembering leads to unintended forgetting. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 909–915.CrossRef Storm, B. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). When intended remembering leads to unintended forgetting. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 909–915.CrossRef
go back to reference Storm, B. C., & Jobe, T. A. (2012). Remembering the past and imagining the future: examining the consequences of mental time travel on memory. Memory, 20, 224–235.CrossRefPubMed Storm, B. C., & Jobe, T. A. (2012). Remembering the past and imagining the future: examining the consequences of mental time travel on memory. Memory, 20, 224–235.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Storm, B. C., Koppel, R. H., & Wilson, B. M. (2013). Selective cues to forget can fail to cause forgetting. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 29–36.CrossRef Storm, B. C., Koppel, R. H., & Wilson, B. M. (2013). Selective cues to forget can fail to cause forgetting. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 29–36.CrossRef
go back to reference Storm, B. C., & Levy, B. J. (2012). A progress report on the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 40, 827–843.CrossRef Storm, B. C., & Levy, B. J. (2012). A progress report on the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 40, 827–843.CrossRef
go back to reference Storm, B. C., & Patel, T. N. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence and enabler of creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Storm, B. C., & Patel, T. N. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence and enabler of creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
go back to reference Vul, E., & Pashler, H. (2007). Incubation benefits only after people have been misdirected. Memory & Cognition, 35(4), 701–710.CrossRef Vul, E., & Pashler, H. (2007). Incubation benefits only after people have been misdirected. Memory & Cognition, 35(4), 701–710.CrossRef
go back to reference Wagenmakers, E. J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779–804.CrossRef Wagenmakers, E. J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779–804.CrossRef
go back to reference Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). New York: Cambridge University Press. Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set: the effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 716–730.CrossRef Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set: the effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 716–730.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
That’s a good idea, but let’s keep thinking! Can we prevent our initial ideas from being forgotten as a consequence of thinking of new ideas?
Auteurs
Annie S. Ditta
Benjamin C. Storm
Publicatiedatum
28-04-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0773-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2017

Psychological Research 3/2017 Naar de uitgave