Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1419-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Zahra Bagheri and Peyman Jafari have contributed equally to this work.
It has been rarely studied whether observed disparity in health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) scores between patients with diabetes and healthy individuals is due to differential item functioning (DIF) or a true difference in the underlying construct. This study aimed to examine DIF in the SF-36 questionnaire and its effect on comparing HRQoL scores between patients with diabetes and healthy people.
The sample consisted of 230 patients with type 2 diabetes and 642 healthy individuals who filled out the Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire. To detect DIF across patients with diabetes and healthy individuals, multiple-group multiple-indicator multiple-causes model was used. In addition, item calibration strategy was used to determine whether the effect of item-level DIF was transferred to the scale level.
Nine out of thirty-six (25 %) items were detected as DIF, of which one item (11 %) was flagged as uniform and eight items (89 %) as non-uniform DIF. Most of the DIF items were detected in the mental health component which includes vitality, perceived mental health and social functioning subscales rather than in physical health component. Moreover, nonsignificant latent mean differences for general health perception and social functioning subscales became significant after DIF calibration.
The findings of the present study show that patients with diabetes and healthy individuals perceived some items in the SF-36 questionnaire differently. More importantly, in some subscales, the effect of item-level DIF was transferred to the scale level. Consequently, considerable caution should be taken in comparing HRQoL scores between patients with diabetes and healthy individuals.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 30 kb)11136_2016_1419_MOESM1_ESM.docx
WHO Organization. (2014). About diabetes. http://www.who.int/diabetes/action_online/basics/en.
International Diabetes Federation. (2014). Key findings. http://www.idf.org.
Santos, M. A., Ceretta, L. B., Reus, G. Z., Abelaira, H. M., Jornada, L. K., Schwalm, M. T., et al. (2014). Anxiety disorders are associated with quality of life impairment in patients with insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes: a case-control study. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 36(4), 298–304. CrossRefPubMed
Moazen, M., Mazloom, Z., Ahmadi, A., Dabbaghmanesh, M. H., & Roosta, S. (2015). Effect of coenzyme Q10 on glycaemic control, oxidative stress and adiponectin in type 2 diabetes. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 65(4), 404–408. PubMed
Sharif, F., Masoudi, M., Ghanizadeh, A., Dabbaghmanesh, M. H., Ghaem, H., & Masoumi, S. (2014). The effect of cognitive-behavioral group therapy on depressive symptoms in people with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 19(5), 529–536. PubMedPubMedCentral
Zhan, P., Zhang, X., Brown, J., Vistisen, D., Sicree, R., Shaw, J., et al. (2010). Global healthcare expenditure on diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 87(3), 293–301. CrossRef
Co, M. A., Tan, L. S., Tai, E. S., Griva, K., Amir, M., Chong, K. J., et al. (2015). Factors associated with psychological distress, behavioral impact and health-related quality of life among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications, 29(3), 378–383. CrossRefPubMed
Dallmeijer, A. J., de Groot, V., Roorda, L. D., Schepers, V. P., Lindeman, E., van den Berg, L. H., et al. (2007). Cross-diagnostic validity of the SF-36 physical functioning scale in patients with stroke, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A study using Rasch analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39(2), 163–169. CrossRefPubMed
Taylor, W. J., & McPherson, K. M. (2007). Using Rasch analysis to compare the psychometric properties of the short form 36 physical function score and the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in patients with psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 57(5), 723–729. CrossRefPubMed
Wolfe, F., Hawley, D. J., Goldenberg, D. L., Russell, I. J., Buskila, D., & Neumann, L. (2000). The assessment of functional impairment in fibromyalgia (FM): Rasch analyses of 5 functional scales and the development of the FM Health Assessment Questionnaire. The Journal of Rheumatology, 27(8), 1989–1999. PubMed
Ostini, R., & Nering, M. L. (2006). Polytomous item response theory models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossRef
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233. CrossRef
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurment invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. CrossRef
Hancock, G. R. (1997). Structural equation modeling methods of hypothesis testing of latent variable means. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30(2), 91–105.
Li, C., Ford, E. S., Zhao, G., Balluz, L. S., Berry, J. T., & Mokdad, A. H. (2010). Undertreatment of mental health problems in adults with diagnosed diabetes and serious psychological distress: The behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2007. Diabetes Care, 33(5), 1061–1064. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Peyrot, M., Rubin, R. R., Lauritzen, T., Snoek, F. J., Matthews, D. R., & Skovlund, S. E. (2005). Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: Results of the cross-national diabetes attitudes, wishes and needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Medicine, 22(10), 1379–1385. CrossRef
Bagheri, Z., Jafari, P., Faghih, M., Allahyari, E., & Dehesh, T. (2015). Testing measurement equivalence of the SF-36 questionnaire across patients on hemodialysis and healthy people. International Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 47(12), 2013–2021. CrossRef
Ware, J. E., Jr., Gandek, B., Kosinski, M., Aaronson, N. K., Apolone, G., Brazier, J., et al. (1998). The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1167–1170. CrossRefPubMed
Teresi, J. A., Ocepek-Welikson, K., Kleinman, M., Eimicke, J. P., Crane, P. K., Jones, R. N., et al. (2009). Analysis of differential item functioning in the depression item bank from the patient reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS): An item response theory approach. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51(2), 148–180. PubMedPubMedCentral
Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(4), 361–370. CrossRef
Teresi, J. A. (2006). Different approaches to differential item functioning in health applications: Advantages, disadvantages and some neglected topics. Medical Care, 44(11), 152–170. CrossRef
Woods, C. M., & Grimm, K. J. (2011). Testing for nonuniform differential item functioning with multiple indicator multiple cause models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(5), 339–361. CrossRef
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Method, 3(1), 4–70. CrossRef
Jafari, P., Sharafi, Z., Bagheri, Z., & Shalileh, S. (2014). Measurement equivalence of theKINDL questionnaire across child self-reports and parent proxy-reports: A comparison between item response theory and ordinal logistic regression. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 45(3), 369–376. CrossRefPubMed
Muthen, B. O. (1985). A method for studying the homogeneity of test items with respect to other relevant variables. Journal of Educational Statistics, 10(2), 121–132.
Muthén, B. O. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49(1), 115–132. CrossRef
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
- Testing whether patients with diabetes and healthy people perceive the meaning of the items in the Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire similarly: a differential item functioning analysis
Mohammad Hossein Dabbaghmanesh
- Springer International Publishing