Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 7/2021

19-10-2020 | Original Article

Temporal productions in a variable environment: timing starts from stimulus identification rather than onset

Auteur: Jordan Wehrman

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 7/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Timing an interval is integral in everyday life, from crossing a street or boiling an egg to playing sports and chatting with friends. In the current article, participants were asked to produce durations ranging from 500 to 1250 ms by either terminating an automatically initiated duration, or by maintaining a key press. When participants expected this production to start was manipulated using a variable foreperiod. Further, between subjects, the durations required for production were either variable or constant within a block. Together, these manipulations set up a temporally—and event—uncertain environment. When participants both initiated and terminated an interval, the uncertainty of the environment did not systematically affect productions. However, when productions were only terminated, productions were longer and given more uncertainty. While the effects of timing onset could be attributed to when a participant registers a stimulus, the effects of uncertainty with regards to what duration would be required for production indicates that participants appear to register what a stimulus is prior to initiating their timing. This finding indicates that timing may relate to when a stimulus is identified, rather than when it is first perceived. Alternatively, perhaps the onset of timing is postponed by event uncertainty.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
A between-subjects design was chosen for the manipulation of event expectation because obtaining consistent data across all conditions in a single subject (a) would require excessive time, and (b) could be confusing in cases where participants switched from a set to a variable target production.
 
2
Note, in this experiment, the RTs from the presentation of the number to the initiation of the production are also examined. In terms of RTs, participants should show the standard RT effects of the variable foreperiod and multiple possible choices.
 
3
Target duration was included to test for possible effects that increase or decrease as the target duration gets longer. If present, these could be indicative of a multiplicative effect of a given factor.
 
4
But see (Wehrman, 2020) who did not find a different onset of auditory or visual oddballs in a simultaneity judgment task.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Birngruber, T., Schröter, H., Schütt, E., & Ulrich, R. (2017). Stimulus expectation prolongs rather than shortens perceived duration: Evidence from self-generated expectations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000433.CrossRef Birngruber, T., Schröter, H., Schütt, E., & Ulrich, R. (2017). Stimulus expectation prolongs rather than shortens perceived duration: Evidence from self-generated expectations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Advanced Online Publication. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​xhp0000433.CrossRef
go back to reference Birngruber, T., Schröter, H., & Ulrich, R. (2014). Duration perception of visual and auditory oddball stimuli: Does judgment task modulate the temporal oddball effect? Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 76(3), 814–828.CrossRef Birngruber, T., Schröter, H., & Ulrich, R. (2014). Duration perception of visual and auditory oddball stimuli: Does judgment task modulate the temporal oddball effect? Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 76(3), 814–828.CrossRef
go back to reference DeCarlo, L. T. J. J. O. M. P. (2012). On a signal detection approach to m-alternative forced choice with bias, with maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches to estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(3), 196–207.CrossRef DeCarlo, L. T. J. J. O. M. P. (2012). On a signal detection approach to m-alternative forced choice with bias, with maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches to estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(3), 196–207.CrossRef
go back to reference Droit-Volet, S. (2008). A further investigation of the filled-duration illusion with a comparison between children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34(3), 400.PubMed Droit-Volet, S. (2008). A further investigation of the filled-duration illusion with a comparison between children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34(3), 400.PubMed
go back to reference Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Now you see it, now you don’t: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task. Cortex, 42(6), 790–796.CrossRefPubMed Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Now you see it, now you don’t: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task. Cortex, 42(6), 790–796.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Grondin, S. (1993). Duration discrimination of empty and filled intervals marked by auditory and visual signals. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 54(3), 383–394.CrossRef Grondin, S. (1993). Duration discrimination of empty and filled intervals marked by auditory and visual signals. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 54(3), 383–394.CrossRef
go back to reference Grondin, S., Ouellet, B., & Roussel, M. E. (2004). Benefits and limits of explicit counting for discriminating temporal intervals. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 58(1), 1.CrossRefPubMed Grondin, S., Ouellet, B., & Roussel, M. E. (2004). Benefits and limits of explicit counting for discriminating temporal intervals. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 58(1), 1.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.
go back to reference Keele, S. W. (1973). Attention and human performance. Santa Monica: Goodyear Publishing Company. Keele, S. W. (1973). Attention and human performance. Santa Monica: Goodyear Publishing Company.
go back to reference Kim, E., & McAuley, J. D. (2013). Effects of pitch distance and likelihood on the perceived duration of deviant auditory events. Attention, Perception and Psychophyics., 75(7), 1547–1558.CrossRef Kim, E., & McAuley, J. D. (2013). Effects of pitch distance and likelihood on the perceived duration of deviant auditory events. Attention, Perception and Psychophyics., 75(7), 1547–1558.CrossRef
go back to reference Kinoshita, S., Mills, L., & Norris, D. (2018). The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory and Cognition, 44(11), 1730–1742.CrossRef Kinoshita, S., Mills, L., & Norris, D. (2018). The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory and Cognition, 44(11), 1730–1742.CrossRef
go back to reference Lin, Y. J., & Shimojo, S. (2017). Triple dissociation of duration perception regulating mechanisms: Top-down attention is inherent. PLoS One, 12(8), e0182639.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lin, Y. J., & Shimojo, S. (2017). Triple dissociation of duration perception regulating mechanisms: Top-down attention is inherent. PLoS One, 12(8), e0182639.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Los, S. A. (2010). Foreperiod and the sequential effect: Theory and data. In A. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 289–302). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Los, S. A. (2010). Foreperiod and the sequential effect: Theory and data. In A. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 289–302). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Los, S. A., & van den Heuvel, C. E. (2001). Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 370–386.CrossRefPubMed Los, S. A., & van den Heuvel, C. E. (2001). Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 370–386.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McAuley, J. D., & Fromboluti, E. K. (2014). Attentional entrainment and perceived event duration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130401.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McAuley, J. D., & Fromboluti, E. K. (2014). Attentional entrainment and perceived event duration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130401.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Nobre, K., & Coull, J. T. (2010). Attention and time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Nobre, K., & Coull, J. T. (2010). Attention and time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Penton-Voak, I. S., Edwards, H., Percival, A., & Wearden, J. H. (1996). Speeding up an internal clock in humans? Effects of click trains on subjective duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22(3), 307.PubMed Penton-Voak, I. S., Edwards, H., Percival, A., & Wearden, J. H. (1996). Speeding up an internal clock in humans? Effects of click trains on subjective duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22(3), 307.PubMed
go back to reference Rammsayer, T. H. (2010). Differences in duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals as a function of base duration. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72(6), 1591–1600.CrossRef Rammsayer, T. H. (2010). Differences in duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals as a function of base duration. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72(6), 1591–1600.CrossRef
go back to reference Steinborn, M. B., Rolke, B., Bratzke, D., & Ulrich, R. (2008). Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: Evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preperation. Acta Psychologica, 129, 297–307.CrossRefPubMed Steinborn, M. B., Rolke, B., Bratzke, D., & Ulrich, R. (2008). Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: Evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preperation. Acta Psychologica, 129, 297–307.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Thomas, E. C., & Brown, I. (1974). Time perception and the filled-duration illusion. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 16(3), 449–458.CrossRef Thomas, E. C., & Brown, I. (1974). Time perception and the filled-duration illusion. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 16(3), 449–458.CrossRef
go back to reference Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(11), 483–488.CrossRef Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(11), 483–488.CrossRef
go back to reference Wearden, J. (2016). SET and human timing. The psychology of time perception. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.CrossRef Wearden, J. (2016). SET and human timing. The psychology of time perception. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.CrossRef
go back to reference Wearden, J., Norton, R., Martin, S., & Montford-Bebb, O. (2007). Internal clock processes and the filled-duration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(3), 716.PubMed Wearden, J., Norton, R., Martin, S., & Montford-Bebb, O. (2007). Internal clock processes and the filled-duration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(3), 716.PubMed
go back to reference Wehrman, J. J., Wearden, J., & Sowman, P. (2020). The expected oddball: effects of implicit and explicit positional expectation on duration perception. Psychological Research, 84, 713–727.CrossRefPubMed Wehrman, J. J., Wearden, J., & Sowman, P. (2020). The expected oddball: effects of implicit and explicit positional expectation on duration perception. Psychological Research, 84, 713–727.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Xuan, B., Chen, X.-C., He, S., & Zhang, D.-R. (2009). Numerical magnitude modulates temporal comparison: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1269, 135–142.CrossRefPubMed Xuan, B., Chen, X.-C., He, S., & Zhang, D.-R. (2009). Numerical magnitude modulates temporal comparison: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1269, 135–142.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Temporal productions in a variable environment: timing starts from stimulus identification rather than onset
Auteur
Jordan Wehrman
Publicatiedatum
19-10-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01430-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2021

Psychological Research 7/2021 Naar de uitgave