Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Gepubliceerd in:
Anatomie hoofdstuk lezen eerste hoofdstuk lezen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

12. Techniek van de sectio caesarea

Auteurs : S. A. Scherjon, J. G. Nijhuis, W. J. A. Gyselaers

Gepubliceerd in: Obstetrische interventies

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Samenvatting

In dit hoofdstuk wordt een beschrijving gegeven van de techniek voor het uitvoeren van een keizersnede. Net als bij iedere andere chirurgische ingreep wordt gestreefd naar een techniek waarbij de weefselschade minimaal is, ischemie en ontsteking waar mogelijk worden voorkomen, en adhesievorming zo gering mogelijk is. Hiernaast wordt gestreefd naar perfecte hemostase met een nauwkeurige approximering van de wondvlakken, die niet te strak worden gehecht, met de hechtingen op een redelijke afstand en gebruikmakend van zo weinig mogelijk hechtmateriaal.
vorige hoofdstuk Inversio uteri
volgende hoofdstuk Sfincterletsel
Literatuur
1.
Leith CR, Walker JJ. The rise in caesarean section rate: the same indications but a lower threshold. BJOG. 1989;105:621-6.
2.
Wax JR. Maternal request cesarean versus planned spontaneous vaginal delivery: maternal morbidity and short term outcomes. Sem Perinatol. 2006;30:247-52.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Ecker Jl, Frigoletto FD. Cesarean delivery and the Risk-Benefit calculus. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:885-8.CrossRef
4.
5.
Althabe F, Soza C, Belizan JM, et al. Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium-, and high-income countries: an ecological study. Birth. 2006;33:270-7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
Heesen M, Klöhr S, Rossaint R, et al. Concerning the timing of antibiotic administration in women undergoing caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Baaqeel H, Baqeel R. Timing of administration of prophylactic antibiotics for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2013;120:661-5.CrossRef
9.
Costantine MM, Rahman M, Ghulmiyah L, et al. Timing of perioperative antibiotics for cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:301.e1-6.
10.
Tita AT, Rouse DJ, Blackwell S, et al. Emerging concepts in antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:675-82.
11.
Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Rouse DJ, et al. Evidencebased surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:294-306.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Lamont RF, Sobel JD, Kusanovic JP, et al. Current debate on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section. BJOG. 2011;118:193-201.CrossRef
13.
Lyimo FM, Massinde AN, Kidenya BR, et al. Single dose of gentamicin in combination with metronidazole versus multiple doses for prevention of post-caesarean infection at Bugando Medical Centre in Mwanza, Tanzania: a randomized, equivalence, controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:123.
14.
Haas DM, Morgan S, Contreras K. Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(1):CD007892.
15.
Quiñones JN, James DN, Stamilio DM, et al. Thromboprophylaxis after cesarean delivery: a decision analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:733-40.CrossRef
16.
Pacheco LD, Saade GR, Costantine MM, et al. Reconsidering the switch from low-molecular-weight heparin to unfractionated heparin during pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 2013 Dec 11 [Epub ahead of print].
17.
Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhun SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. AJOG. 2005;193:1607-17.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Gizzo S, Patrelli TS, Gangi SD, et al. Which uterotonic is better to prevent the postpartum hemorrhage? Latest news in terms of clinical efficacy, side effects, and contraindications: a systematic review. Reprod Sci. 2013;20:1011-9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Peters NCJ, Duvekot JJ. Carbetocin for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Survey. 2009;64:129-35.CrossRef
20.
Su LL, Chong YS, Samuel M. Carbetocin for preventing postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(4):CD005457.
21.
Borruto F, Treisser A, Comparetto C. Utilization of carbetocin for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage after caesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;208:707-12.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Larciprete G, Montagnoli C, Frigo M, et al. Carbetocin versus oxytocin in caesarean section with high risk of post-partum haemorrhage. J Prenat Med. 2013;7:12-8.
23.
Hua J, Chen G, Xing F, et al. Effect of misoprostol versus oxytocin during caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2013;120:531-40.CrossRef
24.
Conde-Agudelo A, Nieto A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Romero R. Misoprostol to reduce intraoperative and postoperative hemorrhage during cesarean delivery: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 209:40.e1-17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Cluver C, Novikova N, Hofmeyr GJ, Hall DR. Maternal position during caesarean section for preventing maternal and neonatal complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(3):CD007623.
26.
Cyna AM, Andrew M, Emmett RS, et al. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD002251.
27.
Li L, Wen J, Wang L, et al. Is routine indwelling catheterization of the bladder for caesarean section necessary? A systematic review. BJOG. 2011;118:400-9.CrossRef
28.
Senanayake H. Elective cesarean section without urethral catheterization. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;31:32-7.CrossRef
29.
Usta IM, Hobeika EM, Musa AA, et al. Placenta previaaccreta: risk factors and complications Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1045-49.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section Obstet Gynecol. 1985;66:89-92.
31.
Mazouni C, Gorincour G, Juhan V, et al. Placenta accreta: a review of current advances in prenatal diagnosis. Placenta. 2007;28:599-603.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192:1458-61.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Cromstock CH. Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accrete: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:89-96.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Su TM, Lan CM, Yang LC, et al. Brain tumor presenting with fatal herniation following delivery under epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:508-9.PubMedCrossRef
35.
36.
Soens MA, Birnbach DJ, Ranasinghe JS, et al. Obstetric anesthesia for the obese and morbidly obese patient: an ounce prevention is worth more than a pound of treatment. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:6-19.CrossRef
37.
Häger RME, Daltveit AK, Hofoss D, et al. Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;109:428-32.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Mancuso A, Vivo A De, Giacobbe A, et al. General versus spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean sections: effects onneonatal short-term outcome. A prospective randomised study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:1114-8.CrossRef
39.
Mancuso A, Afolabi BB, Lesio FEA. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(10):CD004350.
40.
Lagrew DC, Bush MC, McKeown AM, et al. Emergent (crash) cesarean delivery: indications and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:1638-43.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Bautista-Castaño I, Henriquez-Sanchez P, Alemán-Perez N, et al. Maternal obesity in early pregnancy and risk of adverse outcomes. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80410.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Hollowell J, Pillas D, Rowe R, et al. The impact of maternal obesity on intrapartum outcomes in otherwise low risk women: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2013;121;343-55.CrossRef
43.
Abrams B, Parker J. Overweight and pregnancy complications. Int J Obes. 1988;12:293-303.
44.
Hood DD, Dewan DM. Anesthetic and obstetric outcome in morbidly obese patients. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:1210-8.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Munnur U, Boisblanc B de, Suresh MS. Airway problems in pregnancy. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(suppl 10):S259-68.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Jordan H, Perlow MD, Mark A, et al. Massive maternal obesity and perioperative caesarean morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:560-5.
47.
Rothrock RA. Maternal obesity and postcesarean infectious morbidity. Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;107:67S.CrossRef
48.
Conner SN, Verticchio JC, Tuuli MG, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of postcesarean wound complications. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31:299-304.
49.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion no. 549: obesity in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:213-7.
50.
Terris DJ, Seybt MW, Elchoufi M, et al. Cosmetic thyroid surgery: defining the essential principles. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1169-72.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Hasselgren PO, Hagberg E, Malmer H, et al. One instead of two knives for surgical incision. Does it increase the risk of postoperative wound infection? Arch Surg. 1984;119:917-20.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Kearns SR, Connolly EM, McNally S, et al. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy. Br J Surg. 2001;88:41-4.CrossRef
53.
Makoha FW, Fathuddien MA, Felimban HM. Choice of abdominal incision and risk of trauma to the uterine bladder and bowel in multiple cesarean sections. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;125:50-3.
54.
Joel-Cohen S. Abdominal and vaginal hysterectomies. New techniques based on time and motion studies. Londen: Heinemann, 1972. p. 170.
55.
Stark M. Clinical evidence that suturing the peritoneum after laparotomy is unnecessary. World J Surg. 1993;17:419.
56.
Stark M, Finkel AR. Comparison between the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions in caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994;53:121-2.CrossRef
57.
Hohlagschwandter M, Ruecklinger E, Husslein P, et al. Is the formation of a bladder flap at cesarean necessary? A randomised trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:1089-92.
58.
Mahajan NN. Justifying formation of bladder flap at cesarean section? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;279:853-5.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Fogertey P, et al. Utility of the bladder flap at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:815-21.CrossRef
60.
Stark M, Chavkin Y, Kupfersztain C, et al. Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1993;48:273-6.CrossRef
61.
Holmgren G, Sjoholm L, Stark M. The misgav ladach method for cesarean section: method description. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78:615-21.PubMed
62.
Kadir RA, Khan A, Wilcock F, Chapman L. Is inferior dissection of the rectus sheath necessary during pfannenstiel incision for lower segment caesarean section? A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;128:262-6.CrossRef
63.
Giacalone PL, Daures JP, Vignal J, et al. Pfannenstiel versus Maylard incision for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:745-50.
64.
Tixier H, Thouvenot S, Coulange L, et al. Cesarean section in morbidly obese women: supra or subumbilical transverse incision? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009; 88:1049-52.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Houston MC, Raynor BD. Postoperative morbidity in the morbidly obese parturient woman: supraumbilical and low transverse abdominal approaches. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1033-5.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Hema KR, Johanson R. Techniques for performing caesarean section. Best Practice Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;15:17-47.CrossRef
67.
Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Bufkin L, et al. Intraoperative haemorrhage by blunt versus sharp expansion of the uterine incision at caesarean delivery: a randomised clinical study. BJOG. 2002;109:448-52.
68.
Dodd JM, Anderson ER, Gates S. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(8):CD004732.
69.
Xu LL, Chau AM, Zuschmann A. Blunt vs. sharp uterine expansion at lower segment cesarean section delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:62.e1-8.CrossRef
70.
Rodriguez AI, Porter KB, O’Brien WF. Blunt versus sharp expansion of the uterine incision in low-segment transverse cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:1022-5.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Villeneuve MG, Khalifé S, Marcoux S, Blanchet P. Surgical staples in cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:1641-6.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, et al. Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at caesarean delivery: a randomised comparison of 2 techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:292.e1-292.e6.CrossRef
73.
Picone O, Fubini A, Doumere S, et al. Cesarean delivery by posterior hysterotomy due to torsion of the pregnant uterus. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:533-5.CrossRef
74.
Gilson GJ, Kephart WH, Izquierdo LA, et al. Comparison of absorbable uterine staples and traditional hysterotomy during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:384-8.CrossRef
75.
Levy R, Chernomoretz T, Appelman Z, et al. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;121:24-6.CrossRef
76.
Bastani P, Pourabolghasem S, Abbasalizadeh F, Motvalli L. Comparison of neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with head-pushing and head-pulling methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118:1-3. Erratum in: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119:292.
77.
Sethuram R, Jamjute P, Kevelighan E. Delivery of the deeply engaged head: a lacuna in training. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30:545-9.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Sandler SG, Sathiyamoorthy S. Laboratory methods for Rh immunoprophylaxis: a review. Immunohematology. 2010;26:92-103.
79.
David M, Halle H, Lichtenegger W, et al. Nitroglycerin to facilitate fetal extraction during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:119-24.CrossRef
80.
Dodd JM, Reid K. Tocolysis for assisting delivery at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(2):CD004944.
81.
Smith GN, Brien JF. Use of nitroglycerin for uterine relaxation. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1998;53:559-65.CrossRef
82.
Clift K, Clift J. Uterine relaxation during caesarean section under regional anaesthesia: a survey of UK obstetric anaesthetists. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2008;17:374-5.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Anorlu RI, Maholwana B, Hofmeyr GJ. Methods of delivering the placenta at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(3):CD004737.
84.
Hidar S, Jennane TM, Bouguizane S, et al. The effect of placental removal method at caesarean section delivery on preoperative hemorrhage: a randomized clinical trial ISRCTN 49779257. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;117:179-82.
85.
Dehbashi S, Honarvar M, Fardi FH. Manual removal or spontaneous placental delivery and postcesarean endometritis and bleeding. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;86:12-5.CrossRef
86.
Wilkinson C, Enkin MW. Manual removal of placenta at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000130.
87.
Morales M, Ceysens G, Jastrow N, et al. Spontaneous delivery or manual removal of the placenta during caesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. BJOG. 2004;111:908-12.CrossRef
88.
89.
Andersson O, Hellström-Westas L, Andersson D, et al. Effects of delayed compared with early umbilical cord clamping on maternal postpartum hemorrhage and cord blood gas sampling: a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:567-74.PubMedCrossRef
90.
Andersson O, Hellström-Westas L, Andersson D, Domellöf M. Effect of delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping on neonatal outcomes and iron status at 4 months: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;343:d7157.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
91.
Higgins MF, Monteith C, Foley M, O’Herlihy C. Real increasing incidence of hysterectomy for placenta accreta following previous caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;171:54-6.CrossRef
92.
Morlando M, Sarno L, Napolitano R, et al. Placenta accreta: incidence and risk factors in an area with a particularly high rate of cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:457-60.PubMedCrossRef
93.
Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:14-29.PubMedCrossRef
94.
Eshkoli T, Weintraub AY, Sergienko R, Sheiner E. Placenta accreta: risk factors, perinatal outcomes, and consequences for subsequent births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:219.e1-7.
95.
Kamara M, Henderson JJ, Doherty DA, et al. The risk of placenta accreta following primary elective caesarean delivery: a case-control study. BJOG. 2013;120:879-86.CrossRef
96.
Voet L van der, Vaate A bij de, Veersema S, et al. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG. 2014;121:236-44.
97.
Naji O, Wynants L, Smith A, et al. Does the presence of a caesarean section scar affect implantation site and early pregnancy outcome in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit? Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1489-96.PubMedCrossRef
98.
Calì G, Giambanco L, Puccio G, Forlani F. Morbidly adherent placenta: evaluation of ultrasound diagnostic criteria and differentiation of placenta accreta from percreta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:406-12.CrossRef
99.
RCOG Guideline no.27 Placenta praevia, placenta praevia accreta and vasa praevia: diagnosis and management. 2011.
100.
D’Antonio F, Iacovella C, Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42:509-17.CrossRef
101.
Ge J, Liao H, Duan L, et al. Uterine packing during cesarean section in the management of intractable hemorrhage in central placenta previa. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285:285-9.PubMedCrossRef
102.
Vrachnis N, Iavazzo C, Salakos N, et al. Uterine tamponade balloon for the management of massive hemorrhage during cesarean section due to placenta previa/increta. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:255-7.
103.
Ishii T, Sawada K, Koyama S, et al. Balloon tamponade during cesarean section is useful for severe post-partum hemorrhage due to placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012;38:102-7.CrossRef
104.
Matsubara S. Practical consideration of inserting intrauterine balloon during cesarean section for placenta previa. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014; 93:120-1.PubMedCrossRef
105.
Penotti M, Vercellini P, Bolis G, Fedele L. Compressive suture of the lower uterine segment for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage due to complete placenta previa: a preliminary study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012; 73:314-20.PubMedCrossRef
106.
Matsubara S. Uterine necrosis after B-Lynch suture in a classical caesarean section. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;53:595-6.PubMedCrossRef
107.
Amorim-Costa C, Mota R, Rebelo C, Silva PT. Uterine compression sutures for postpartum hemorrhage: is routine postoperative cavity evaluation needed? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:701-6.PubMedCrossRef
108.
Penotti M, Vercellini P, Bolis G, Fedele L. Compressive suture of the lower uterine segment for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage due to complete placenta previa: a preliminary study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012;73:314-20.PubMedCrossRef
109.
Nanda S, Singhal SR. Hayman uterine compression stitch for arresting atonic postpartum hemorrhage: 5 years experience. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;50: 179-81.PubMedCrossRef
110.
Poujade O, Ceccaldi PF, Davitian C, et al. Uterine necrosis following pelvic arterial embolization for postpartum hemorrhage: review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170:309-14.CrossRef
111.
Treloar EJ, Anderson RS, Andrews HS, Bailey Jl. Uterine necrosis following B-Lynch suture for primary postpartum haemorrhage. BJOG. 2006;113:486-8.CrossRef
112.
An GH, Ryu HM, Kim MY, et al. Outcomes of subsequent pregnancies after uterine compression sutures for postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:565-70.
113.
Bręborowicz GH, Markwitz W, Gaca M, et al. Conservative management of placenta previa complicated by abnormal placentation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:1012-5.CrossRef
114.
Chung MY, Cheng YK, Yu SC, et al. Nonremoval of an abnormally invasive placenta at cesarean section with postoperative uterine artery embolization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:1250-5.PubMedCrossRef
115.
Chandraharan E, Rao S, Belli AM, Arulkumaran S. The Triple-P-procedure as a conservative surgical alternative to peripartum hysterectomy for placenta percreta. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012,117:191-4.CrossRef
116.
Jacobs-Jokhan D, Hofmeyr GJ. Extra-abdominal versus intra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(4):CD000085.
117.
Coutinho IC, Ramos de Amorim MM, Katz L, et al. Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:639-47.
118.
Orji EO, Olaleye AO, Loto OM, Ogunniyi SO. A randomised controlled trial of uterine exteriorisation and non-exteriorisation at caesarean section. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48:570-4.PubMedCrossRef
119.
Wahab MA, Karantis P, Eccersley PS, et al. A randomised, controlled study of uterine exteriorisation and repair at caesarean section. BJOG. 1999;106:913-6.CrossRef
120.
Siddiqui M, Goldszmidt E, Fallah S, et al. Complications of exteriorized compared with in situ repair at cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:570-5.
121.
Nafisi S. Influence of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair on post-cesarean maternal pain: a randomized trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007;16:135-8.PubMedCrossRef
122.
Orji EO, Olaleye AO, Loto OM, Ogunniyi SO. A randomised controlled trial of uterine exteriorisation and non-exteriorisation at caesarean section. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48:570-4.PubMedCrossRef
123.
Kearns SR, Connolly EM, McNally S, et al. Infection rates after cesarean delivery with exteriorized versus intraperitoneal uterine closure. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107:68-9S.
124.
CAESAR Study Collaborative Group. Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR). BJOG. 2010;117:1366-76.
125.
Hamar BD, Saber SB, Cackovic M, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:808-13.CrossRef
126.
Lal K, Tomso K. Comparative study of single and conventional closure of uterine incision in cesarean section. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;27:349-52.
127.
Chapman SJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. One-versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy. Obstet Gyn. 1997;89:16-8.CrossRef
128.
Bujold E, Bujold C, Hamilton EF, et al. The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1326-30. Discussie: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;189:895-6.
129.
Grundsell HS, Rizk DEE, Kumar MR. Randomized study of non-closure of peritoneum in lower segment cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:110-5.PubMedCrossRef
130.
131.
Andolf E, Thorsell M, Källén K. Caesarean section and risk for endometriosis: a prospective cohort study of Swedish registries. BJOG. 2013;120:1061-5.CrossRef
132.
Oligbo N, Revicky V, Udeh R. Pomeroy technique or Filshie clips for postpartum sterilisation? Retrospective study on comparison between Pomeroy procedure and Filshie clips for a tubal occlusion at the time of Caesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;28:1073-5.PubMedCrossRef
133.
Ozyer S, Moraloğlu O, Gülerman C, et al. Tubal sterilization during cesarean section or as an elective procedure? Effect on the ovarian reserve. Contraception. 2012;86:488-93.PubMedCrossRef
134.
Nelson AL, Chen S, Eden R. Intraoperative placement of the Copper T-380 intrauterine devices in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery: a pilot study. Contraception. 2009;80:81-3.PubMedCrossRef
135.
Grundsell HS, Rizk DE, Kumar RM. Randomized study of non-closure of peritoneum in lower segment cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:110-5.PubMedCrossRef
136.
Makoha FW, Felimban HM, Fathuddien MA, et al. Multiple cesarean section morbidity. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2004;68:227-32.CrossRef
137.
Nabhan AF. Long-term outcomes of two different surgical techniques for cesarean. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;100:69-75.CrossRef
138.
Kapustian V, Anteby EY, Gdalevich M, et al. Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:56.e1-4.CrossRef
139.
Lyell DJ, Caughey AB, Hu E, Daniels K. Peritoneal closure at primary cesarean delivery and adhesions. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;10:275-80.CrossRef
140.
Shi Z, Ma L, Yang Y, et al. Adhesion formation after previous caesarean section-a meta-analysis and systematic review. BJOG. 2011;118:410-22.CrossRef
141.
Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(4):CD000163.
142.
Rafique Z, Shibli KU, Russell LF, et al. A randomised controlled trial of the closure or non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: effect on post-operative pain. BJOG. 2002;109:694-8.CrossRef
143.
Zareian Z, Zareian P. Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study periotoneal closure during cesarean. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;128:267-9.CrossRef
144.
Edwards RK, Ingersoll M, Gerkin RD, et al. Carboxymethylcellulose adhesion barrier placement at primary cesarean delivery and outcomes at repeat cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:923-8.CrossRef
145.
Anderson ER, Gates S. Techniques and materials for closure of the abdominal wall in caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(4):CD004663.
146.
Gaertner I, Burkhardt T, Beinder E. Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in caesarean section: a randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;138:29-33.CrossRef
147.
Huppelschoten AG, Ginderen JC van, Broek KC van den, et al. Different ways of subcutaneous tissue and skin closure at cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial on the long-term cosmetic outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:916-24.PubMedCrossRef
148.
Ramsey PS, White AM, Guinn DA, et al. Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:967-73.
149.
Alderdice F, McKenna D, Dorman J. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Chichester: Wiley, 2004.
150.
Clay FSH, Walsh CA, Walsh SR. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;202:378-83.PubMedCrossRef
151.
Rousseau J-A, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:265.e1-265.e4.CrossRef
152.
Aabakke AJ, Krebs L, Pipper CB, Secher NJ. Subcuticular suture compared with staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:878-84.CrossRef
153.
Zanardo V, Gabrieli C, Luca F de, et al. Head-to-body delivery by ‘two-step’ approach: effect on cord blood hematocrit. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013; 26:1234-8.CrossRef
154.
Ferrari AG, Frigero LG, Candotti G, et al. Can Joel-Cohen incision and single layer reconstruction reduce cesarean section morbidity? Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;72:135-43.CrossRef
155.
Mathai M, Hofmeyr GJ. Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(1):CD004453.
156.
Hofmeyr GJ, Mathai M, Shah AN, et al. Techniques for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(1):CD004662.
157.
Wechter ME, Pearlman MD, Hartmann KE. Reclosure of the disrupted laparotomy wound: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:376-83.CrossRef
158.
Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, et al. Elective caesarean section and respiratory morbidity in the term and near-term neonate. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 86:389-94.
159.
Gerten KA, Coonrod DV, Bay RC, et al. Cesarean delivery and respiratory distress syndrome: does labor make a difference? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1061-4.PubMedCrossRef
160.
LeRay C, Boithias C, Castaigne-Meary V, et al. Caesarean before labour between 34 and 37 weeks: What are the risk factors of severe neonatal respiratory distress? Eur J Obstet Gyn Reprod Biol. 2006;127:56-60.
161.
Berg A van den, Elburg RM van, Geijn HP van, et al. Neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section in term infants. A 5-year retrospective study and a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;98:9-13.
162.
Jain L, Dudell GG. Respiratory transition in infants delivered by cesarean section. Semin Perinat. 2006; 30:296-304.PubMedCrossRef
163.
Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory failure after elective repeat cesarean delivery: a potential preventable condition leading to extracorporal membrane oxygenation. BJOG. 1995;102:101-6.
164.
Graziosi GCM, Bakker CM, Brouwers HA, et al. Electieve sectio caesarea bij voorkeur na minimaal 38 complete zwangerschapsweken. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998;142:2300-3.
165.
Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, et al. Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: cohort study. BMJ. 2008;236:85-7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
166.
Kolås T, Saugstad OD, Daltveit AK, et al. Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term: comparison of newborn infant outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1538-43.PubMedCrossRef
167.
Stutchfield P, Whitaker R, Russell I. Antenatal betamethasone and incidence of neonatal respiratory distress after elective caesarean section: pragmatic randomized trial. BMJ. 2005;331:662.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
168.
Faiz AS, Annath CV. Etiology and risk factors for placenta previa: an overview and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Matern Fetal Neon Med. 2003;13:175-90.CrossRef
169.
Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:976-80.
170.
Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse RJ, et al.; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1126-32.
171.
Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1187-97.PubMedCrossRef
172.
Kessous R, Sheiner E. Is there an association between short interval from previous cesarean section and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcome. J Mat Fetal Neon Med. 2013;26:1003-6.CrossRef
173.
Stamilio DM, DeFranco E, Pare E, et al. Short interpregnancy interval. Risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1075-82.CrossRef
174.
Smith GCS, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet. 2003;362:1779-84.
175.
Salihu HM, Sharma PP, Kristensen S, et al. Risk of stillbirth following a cesarean delivery: black-white disparity. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:383-90.CrossRef
176.
O’Neill SM, Kearney PM, Kenny LC, et al. Caesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancy interval: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;8:e54588.
177.
Smith GC, Pell JP, Cameron AD, et al. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;287:2684-90.PubMedCrossRef
178.
Kjerulff KH, Zhu J, Weisman CS, Ananth CV. First birth caesarean section and subsequent fertility: a population-based study in the USA, 2000-2008. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:3349-57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
179.
Smith GCS, Wood AM, Pell JP, et al. First cesarean birth and subsequent fertility. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85:90-5.PubMedCrossRef
180.
Su LL, Chong YS, Samuel M. Oxytocin agonists for preventing postpartum hemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(3):CD005457.
181.
Katz V, Balderston K, DeFreest M. Perimortem cesarean delivery; were our assumptions correct? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1916-21.PubMedCrossRef
182.
CORONIS Collaborative Group. Caesarean section surgical techniques (CORONIS): a fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382:234-48.
Metagegevens
Titel
Techniek van de sectio caesarea
Auteurs
S. A. Scherjon
J. G. Nijhuis
W. J. A. Gyselaers
Copyright
2017
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek
Obstetrische interventies

Print ISBN: 978-90-368-1743-1

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-1744-8

Copyright: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-1744-8_12