Top

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2010 | Original Paper

Task Engagement and Escape Maintained Challenging Behavior: Differential Effects of General and Explicit Cues When Implementing a Signaled Delay in the Delivery of Reinforcement

Auteurs: Joe Reichle, LeAnne Johnson, Emily Monn, Michael Harris

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 6/2010

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the effects of explicit and general delay cues when implementing a tolerance for a delay in the delivery of a reinforcement procedure to increase task engagement and decrease escape maintained challenging behavior. Two preschool children with autism participated in an alternating treatments design with changing criterions for task engagement. For both children, descriptive and experimental analyses verified that the challenging behavior functioned to escape instructional task demands. Subsequently, two types of tasks were identified for each participant with assignment to either the explicit or general cue procedures. Both participants demonstrated increased task engagement with concurrent decreases in challenging behavior with both types of delay cues, though rate of successful work unit completion advanced more quickly with explicit delay cues.

vorige artikel Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Dental Plaque Control Program in Autistic Patients

volgende artikel Health-Related Quality of Life in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Results from the Autism Treatment Network

Allen, K. D., Loiben, T., Allen, S. J., & Stanley, R. T. (1992). Dentist-implemented contingent escape for management of disruptive child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 629–636.CrossRefPubMed

Bayley, N. (1993). Bayley scales of infant development (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Bondy, A., & Frost, L. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9, 1–19.

Carr, E. G., & Carlson, J. I. (1993). Reduction of severe behavior problems in the community using a multicomponent treatment approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 157–172.CrossRefPubMed

Carr, E. G., Newsom, C. D., & Binkoff, J. A. (1980). Escape as a factor in the aggressive behavior of two retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 101–117.CrossRefPubMed

DeLeon, I. G., Neidert, P. L., Anders, B. M., & Rodriguez-Catter, V. (2001). Choices between positive and negative reinforcement during treatment for escape-maintained behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 521–525.CrossRefPubMed

Dunlap, G., Koegel, R. L., Johnson, J., & O’Neill, R. E. (1987). Maintaining performance of autistic clients in community settings with delayed contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 185–191.CrossRefPubMed

Eno-Hieneman, M., Dunlap, G., & Reed, M. (1995). Predictability, structure, and personal control: Some issues in behavioral support for people with severe disabilities. Network, 4, 23–29.

Everett, G. E., Olmi, D. J., Edwards, R. P., Tingstrom, D. H., Sterling-Turner, H. E., & Christ, T. J. (2007). An empirical investigation of time-out with and without escape extinction to treat escape-maintained noncompliance. Behavior Modification, 31, 412–434.CrossRefPubMed

Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., Hagopian, L. P., Bowman, L. G., & Krug, A. (2000). Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training. Behavior Modification, 24, 3–29.CrossRefPubMed

Flannery, K. B., O’Neill, R. E., & Horner, R. H. (1995). Including predictability in functional assessment and individual program development. Education and Treatment of Children, 18, 499–509.

Fowler, S. A., & Baer, D. M. (1981). “Do I have to be good all day?” The timing of delayed reinforcement as a factor in generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 13–24.CrossRefPubMed

Gouboth, D., Wilder, D. A., & Booher, J. (2007). The effects of signaling stimulus presentation during noncontingent reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 725–730.PubMed

Grey, I., Healy, O., Leader, G., & Hayes, D. (2009). Using a time timer to increase appropriate waiting behavior in a child with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 359–366.CrossRefPubMed

Hagopian, L. P., Kuhn, S. C., Long, E. S., & Rush, K. S. (2005). Schedule thinning following communication training using competing stimuli to enhance tolerance to decrements in reinforcer density. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 177–193.CrossRefPubMed

Hagopian, L. P., Toole, L. M., Long, E. S., Bowman, L. G., & Lieving, G. A. (2004). A comparison of dense-to-lean and fixed-lean schedules of alternative reinforcement and extinction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 323–338.CrossRefPubMed

Johnson-Martin, N. M., Attermeier, S. S., & Hacker, B. (1991). Carolina curriculum for preschoolers with special needs (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kemp, D. C., & Carr, E. G. (1995). Reduction of severe problem behavior in community employment using an hypothesis-driven multicomponent intervention approach. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 229–247.

Kern, L., Carberry, N., & Haidara, C. (1997). Analysis and intervention with two topographies of challenging behavior exhibited by a young woman with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 18, 275–287.CrossRefPubMed

Kodak, T., Lerman, D. C., Volkert, V. M., & Trosclair, T. (2007). Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 25–44.CrossRefPubMed

Lalli, J. S., Casey, S., & Kates, K. (1995a). Reducing escape behavior and increasing task completion with functional communication training, extinction, and response chaining. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 261–268.CrossRefPubMed

Lalli, J. S., Mace, F. C., Wohn, T., & Livezey, K. (1995b). Identification and modification of a response-class hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 551–559.CrossRefPubMed

Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Jr., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communicative deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 30, 205–223.CrossRef

Mayer-Johnson, R. (1992). The picture communication symbols (Books I–III). Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.

Mildon, R. L., Moore, D. W., & Dixon, R. S. (2004). Combining noncontingent escape and functional communication training as a treatment for negatively reinforced disruptive behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 92–102.CrossRef

Moore, D. W., Anderson, A., & Kumar, K. (2005). Instructional adaptation in the management of escape-maintained behavior in a classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 216–223.CrossRef

Mullen, E. M. (1995). Mullen scales of early learning (AGS edition). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service Inc.

Pace, G. M., Iwata, B. A., Cowdery, G. E., Andree, P. J., & McIntyre, T. (1993). Stimulus (instructional) fading during extinction of self-injurious escape behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 205–212.CrossRefPubMed

Patel, M. R., Piazza, C. C., Martinez, C. J., Volkert, V. M., & Santana, C. M. (2002). An evaluation of two differential reinforcement procedures with escape extinction to treat food refusal. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 363–374.CrossRefPubMed

Reese, R. M., Richman, D. M., Belmont, J. M., & Morse, P. (2005). Functional characteristics of disruptive behavior in developmentally disabled children with and without autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 419–428.CrossRefPubMed

Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., DeVellis, R. F., & Daly, K. (1988). The childhood autism rating scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1984). Vineland adaptive behavior scale. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.

Vollmer, T. R., Borrero, J. C., Lalli, J. S., & Daniel, D. (1999a). Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 451–466.CrossRefPubMed

Vollmer, T. R., Roane, H. S., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1999b). Evaluating treatment challenges with differential reinforcement of alternative behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 9–23.CrossRef

Wacker, D. P., Steege, M. W., Northup, J., Sasso, G., Berg, W., Reimers, T. L., et al. (1990). A component analysis of functional communication training across three topographies of severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 417–429.CrossRefPubMed

Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V. G., & Pond, R. E. (1992). Preschool language scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V. G., & Pond, R. E. (2002). Preschool language scale (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

Titel: Task Engagement and Escape Maintained Challenging Behavior: Differential Effects of General and Explicit Cues When Implementing a Signaled Delay in the Delivery of Reinforcement
Auteurs: Joe Reichle
LeAnne Johnson
Emily Monn
Michael Harris
Publicatiedatum: 01-06-2010
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0946-6

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2010

Gary Mayerson: How to Compromise with Your School District Without Compromising Your Child: A Field Guide for Getting Effective Services for Children with Special Needs

Early Interests and Joint Engagement in Typical Development, Autism, and Down Syndrome

Ann Palmer: Realizing the College Dream with Autism or Asperger Syndrome

Randomized Controlled Trial for Early Intervention for Autism: A Pilot Study of the Autism 1-2-3 Project

Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Dental Plaque Control Program in Autistic Patients

Brief Report: No Increase in Criminal Convictions in Hans Asperger’s Original Cohort