Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2007

01-07-2007 | Original Article

Target-related coupling in bimanual reaching movements

Auteurs: Matthias Weigelt, Martina Rieger, Franz Mechsner, Wolfgang Prinz

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

While bimanual interference effects can be observed when symbolic cues indicate the parameter values of simultaneous reaching movements, these effects disappear under conditions in which the target locations of two movements are cued directly. The present study investigates the generalizability of these target-location cuing benefits to conditions in which symbolic cues are used to indicate target locations (i.e., the end points of bimanual movements). Participants were asked to move to two of four possible target locations, being located either at the same and different distances (Experiment 1), or in the same and different directions (Experiment 2). Circles and crosses served as symbolic target-location cues and were arranged in a symmetric or non-symmetric fashion over the four target locations. Each trial was preceded by a variable precuing interval. Results revealed faster initiation times for equivalent as compared to non-equivalent target locations (same vs. different cues). Moreover, the time course of prepartion suggests that this effect is in fact due to target-equivalence and not to cue-similarity. Bimanual interference relative to movement parameter values was not observed. These findings suggest that cuing target locations can dominate potential intermanual interference effects during the concurrent programming of different movement parameter values.
Literatuur
go back to reference Cardosa S. de Oliveira (2002). The neuronal basis of bimanual coordination: recent neurophysiological evidence and functional models. Acta Physiologica, 110, 139–159. Cardosa S. de Oliveira (2002). The neuronal basis of bimanual coordination: recent neurophysiological evidence and functional models. Acta Physiologica, 110, 139–159.
go back to reference Diedrichsen, J., Hazeltine, E., Kennerley, S., & Ivry, R.B. (2001). Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychological Science, 12(6), 493–498.CrossRefPubMed Diedrichsen, J., Hazeltine, E., Kennerley, S., & Ivry, R.B. (2001). Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychological Science, 12(6), 493–498.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Diedrichsen, J., Ivry, R.B., Hazeltine, E., Kennerly, S., & Cohen, A. (2003). Bimanual inference associated with the selection of target locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 29 (1), 64–77.PubMedCrossRef Diedrichsen, J., Ivry, R.B., Hazeltine, E., Kennerly, S., & Cohen, A. (2003). Bimanual inference associated with the selection of target locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 29 (1), 64–77.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hazeltine, E., Diedrichsen, J., Kennerley, S.W., & Ivry, R.B. (2003). Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of movement parameters. Psychological Research, 67, 56–70.PubMed Hazeltine, E., Diedrichsen, J., Kennerley, S.W., & Ivry, R.B. (2003). Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of movement parameters. Psychological Research, 67, 56–70.PubMed
go back to reference Heuer, H. (1993). Structural constraints on bimanual movements. Psychological Research, 55, 83–98.CrossRefPubMed Heuer, H. (1993). Structural constraints on bimanual movements. Psychological Research, 55, 83–98.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Heuer, H., Spijkers, W., Kleinsorge, T., van der Loo, H., & Steglich, C. (1998). The time course of cross-talk during the simultaneous specification of bimanual movement amplitudes. Experimental Brain Research, 118, 381–392.CrossRef Heuer, H., Spijkers, W., Kleinsorge, T., van der Loo, H., & Steglich, C. (1998). The time course of cross-talk during the simultaneous specification of bimanual movement amplitudes. Experimental Brain Research, 118, 381–392.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(4). Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(4).
go back to reference Ivry, R.B., Diedrichsen, J., Spencer, R.C.M., Hazeltine, E., & Semjen, A. (2004). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on bimanual coordination. In S. Swinnen and J. Duysens (Eds.), Neuro-Behavioral Determinants of Interlimb Coordination: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Norwell: Kluwer Ivry, R.B., Diedrichsen, J., Spencer, R.C.M., Hazeltine, E., & Semjen, A. (2004). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on bimanual coordination. In S. Swinnen and J. Duysens (Eds.), Neuro-Behavioral Determinants of Interlimb Coordination: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Norwell: Kluwer
go back to reference Kelso, J.S., Southard, D.L., & Goodman, D. (1979). On the coordination of two-handed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 229–238.CrossRefPubMed Kelso, J.S., Southard, D.L., & Goodman, D. (1979). On the coordination of two-handed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 229–238.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kunde, W. & Weigelt, M. (2005). Goal-congruency in bimanual object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31 (1), 145–156.CrossRefPubMed Kunde, W. & Weigelt, M. (2005). Goal-congruency in bimanual object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31 (1), 145–156.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Marteniuk, R.G., MacKenzie, C.L., & Baba, D.M. (1984). Bimanual movement control: Information processing and interaction effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 36(2), 335–365. Marteniuk, R.G., MacKenzie, C.L., & Baba, D.M. (1984). Bimanual movement control: Information processing and interaction effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 36(2), 335–365.
go back to reference Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(20), 129–154. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(20), 129–154.
go back to reference Rinkenauer, G., Ulrich, R., & Wing, A.M. (2001). Brief bimanual force pulses: correlations between the hands in force and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(6), 1485–1497.CrossRefPubMed Rinkenauer, G., Ulrich, R., & Wing, A.M. (2001). Brief bimanual force pulses: correlations between the hands in force and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(6), 1485–1497.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rosenbaum, D.A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.CrossRef Rosenbaum, D.A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosenbaum, D.A. (1983). The movement precueing technique: Assumptions application, and extension. In R. A. Magill (Ed.): Memory and control of action. (pp. 231–274). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Rosenbaum, D.A. (1983). The movement precueing technique: Assumptions application, and extension. In R. A. Magill (Ed.): Memory and control of action. (pp. 231–274). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Schmidt, R.A. & Lee, T.D. (Eds.). (1999). Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis (3 Ed.). Campaign: Human Kinetics. Schmidt, R.A. & Lee, T.D. (Eds.). (1999). Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis (3 Ed.). Campaign: Human Kinetics.
go back to reference Spijkers, W. & Heuer, H. (1995). Structural constraints on the performance of symmetrical bimanual movements with different amplitudes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 48(3), 716–740. Spijkers, W. & Heuer, H. (1995). Structural constraints on the performance of symmetrical bimanual movements with different amplitudes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 48(3), 716–740.
go back to reference Spijkers, W., Heuer, H., Kleinsorge, T., & van der Loo, H. (1997). Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: Specification interference as revealed by reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 96, 207–227.CrossRef Spijkers, W., Heuer, H., Kleinsorge, T., & van der Loo, H. (1997). Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: Specification interference as revealed by reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 96, 207–227.CrossRef
go back to reference Steglich, C. (2002). Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur bimanuellen Koordination als transiente Kopplung bei der Richtungsspezifikation. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. RWTH Aachen. Steglich, C. (2002). Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur bimanuellen Koordination als transiente Kopplung bei der Richtungsspezifikation. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. RWTH Aachen.
go back to reference Steglich, C., Heuer, H., Spijkers, W., & Kleinsorge, T. (1999). Bimanual coupling during the specification of isometric forces. Experimental Brain Research, 129(2), 302–316.CrossRef Steglich, C., Heuer, H., Spijkers, W., & Kleinsorge, T. (1999). Bimanual coupling during the specification of isometric forces. Experimental Brain Research, 129(2), 302–316.CrossRef
go back to reference Weigelt, M., Kunde, W., & Prinz, W. (2005). End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation. Experimental Psychology, (in press). Weigelt, M., Kunde, W., & Prinz, W. (2005). End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation. Experimental Psychology, (in press).
Metagegevens
Titel
Target-related coupling in bimanual reaching movements
Auteurs
Matthias Weigelt
Martina Rieger
Franz Mechsner
Wolfgang Prinz
Publicatiedatum
01-07-2007
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0043-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2007

Psychological Research 4/2007 Naar de uitgave