Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2008

01-07-2008 | Original Article

Taking patterns for chunks: is there any evidence of chunk learning in continuous serial reaction-time tasks?

Auteur: Luis Jiménez

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2008

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

When exposed to a regular sequence, people learn to exploit its predictable structure. There have been two major ways of thinking about learning under these conditions: either as the acquisition of general statistical information about the transition probabilities displayed by the sequence or as a process of memorizing and using separate chunks that can later become progressively composed with extended practice. Even though chunk learning has been adopted by some theories of skill acquisition as their main building block, the evidence for chunk formation is scarce in some areas, and is especially so in the continuous serial reaction-time (SRT) task, which has become a major research tool in the study of implicit learning. This article presents a reappraisal, replication and extension of an experiment that stands so far as one of the few alleged demonstrations of chunk learning in the SRT task (Koch and Hoffmann, Psychological Res., 63:22–35, 2000). It shows that the effects which were taken as evidence for chunk learning can indeed be obtained before any systematic training and thus surely reflect a preexistent tendency rather than a learned outcome. Further analyses of the effects after extended practice confirm that this tendency remains essentially unchanged over continuous training unlike what could be expected from a chunk-based account of sequence learning.
Literatuur
go back to reference Christiansen, M. H., Allen, J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1998). Learning to segment speech using multiple cues: A connectionist model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 221–268.CrossRef Christiansen, M. H., Allen, J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1998). Learning to segment speech using multiple cues: A connectionist model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 221–268.CrossRef
go back to reference Cleeremans, A. (1993). Mechanisms of implicit learning: A connectionist model of sequence processing. Cambridge: MIT Press. Cleeremans, A. (1993). Mechanisms of implicit learning: A connectionist model of sequence processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Frensch, P. A., Buchner, A., & Lin, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of distractor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 567–584.CrossRef Frensch, P. A., Buchner, A., & Lin, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of distractor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 567–584.CrossRef
go back to reference Inquisit 1.33 [Computer software]. (2003). Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software L.L.C. Inquisit 1.33 [Computer software]. (2003). Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software L.L.C.
go back to reference Jiménez, L., Vaquero, J. M. M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Qualitative differences between implicit and explicit sequence learning. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 475–490.PubMedCrossRef Jiménez, L., Vaquero, J. M. M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Qualitative differences between implicit and explicit sequence learning. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 475–490.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000). Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks. Psychological Research, 63, 22–35.PubMedCrossRef Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000). Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks. Psychological Research, 63, 22–35.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Koch, I., Philipp, A. M., & Gade, M. (2006). Chunking in task sequences modulates task inhibition. Psychological Science, 17, 346–350.PubMedCrossRef Koch, I., Philipp, A. M., & Gade, M. (2006). Chunking in task sequences modulates task inhibition. Psychological Science, 17, 346–350.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirementes of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.CrossRef Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirementes of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Perruchet, P. (2005). Statistical approaches to language acquisition and the self-organizing consciousness: A reversal of perspective. Psychological Research, 69, 316–329.PubMedCrossRef Perruchet, P. (2005). Statistical approaches to language acquisition and the self-organizing consciousness: A reversal of perspective. Psychological Research, 69, 316–329.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Perruchet, P., & Gallego, J. (1997). A subjective unit formation account of implicit learning. In D. Berry (Ed.), How implicit is implicit learning (pp. 124–161). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Perruchet, P., & Gallego, J. (1997). A subjective unit formation account of implicit learning. In D. Berry (Ed.), How implicit is implicit learning (pp. 124–161). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (1998). PARSER: A model for word segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 246–263.CrossRef Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (1998). PARSER: A model for word segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 246–263.CrossRef
go back to reference Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (2002). The self-organizing consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 297–388.PubMed Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (2002). The self-organizing consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 297–388.PubMed
go back to reference Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 233–238.PubMedCrossRef Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 233–238.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 585–594.CrossRef Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 585–594.CrossRef
go back to reference Sakai, K., Kitaguchi, K., & Hikosaka, O. (2003). Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 229–242.CrossRef Sakai, K., Kitaguchi, K., & Hikosaka, O. (2003). Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 229–242.CrossRef
go back to reference Schneider, D. W. (2007). Task-set inhibition in chunked task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review (in press). Schneider, D. W. (2007). Task-set inhibition in chunked task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review (in press).
go back to reference Servan-Schreiber, E., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 592–608.CrossRef Servan-Schreiber, E., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 592–608.CrossRef
go back to reference Stadler, M. A. (1993). Implicit learning: Questions inspired by Hebb (1961). Memory and Cognition 21, 819–827. Stadler, M. A. (1993). Implicit learning: Questions inspired by Hebb (1961). Memory and Cognition 21, 819–827.
go back to reference Stadler, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 674–685.CrossRef Stadler, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 674–685.CrossRef
go back to reference Vaquero, J. M. M., Jiménez, L., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). The problem of reversals in assessing sequence learning with serial reaction time tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 97–109.CrossRef Vaquero, J. M. M., Jiménez, L., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). The problem of reversals in assessing sequence learning with serial reaction time tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 97–109.CrossRef
go back to reference Verwey, W., & Eikelboom, T. (2003). Evidence for lasting sequence segmentation in the discrete sequence-production task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 171–181.PubMedCrossRef Verwey, W., & Eikelboom, T. (2003). Evidence for lasting sequence segmentation in the discrete sequence-production task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 171–181.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Verwey, W., Lammens, R., & Van Honk, J. (2002). On the role of the SMA in the discrete sequence production task: A TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1268–1276.PubMedCrossRef Verwey, W., Lammens, R., & Van Honk, J. (2002). On the role of the SMA in the discrete sequence production task: A TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1268–1276.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Taking patterns for chunks: is there any evidence of chunk learning in continuous serial reaction-time tasks?
Auteur
Luis Jiménez
Publicatiedatum
01-07-2008
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2008
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-007-0121-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2008

Psychological Research 4/2008 Naar de uitgave