Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 6/2014

01-08-2014

Tackling Acute Cases of School Bullying in the KiVa Anti-Bullying Program: A Comparison of Two Approaches

Auteurs: Claire F. Garandeau, Elisa Poskiparta, Christina Salmivalli

Gepubliceerd in: Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology | Uitgave 6/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Whether cases of bullying should be handled in a direct, condemning mode or in a manner that does not involve blaming the perpetrator is a controversial issue among school professionals. This study compares the effectiveness of a Confronting Approach where the bully is openly told that his behavior must cease immediately to a Non-Confronting Approach where the adult shares his concern about the victim with the bully and invites him to provide suggestions on what could improve the situation. We analysed 339 cases of bullying involving 314 children from grades 1 to 9 (mean age = 11.95). Cases were handled in 65 schools as part of the implementation of the KiVa anti-bullying program. In each school, a team of three teachers addressed cases coming to their attention by organizing discussions with the bullies using either a Confronting or a Non-Confronting Approach; schools were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions. Victims reported that bullying stopped in 78 % of the cases. Logistic regression analyses indicated that neither approach was overall more effective than the other, controlling for grade level, duration of victimization and type of aggression. The Confronting Approach worked better than the Non-Confronting Approach in secondary school (grades 7 to 9), but not in primary school (grades 1 to 6). The Confronting Approach was more successful than the Non-Confronting Approach in cases of short-term victimization, but not in cases of long-term victimization. The type of aggression used did not moderate the effectiveness of either approach.
Voetnoten
1
As the main effect of duration of victimization was included in the model, the unequal proportion of cases across the two approaches at the various levels of duration (see Measures) is not likely to bias the effects obtained. In fact, when we tested for the main effect of approach, without controlling for duration, the Confronting Approach was significantly more effective (p = 0.010) than the Non-Confronting Approach. However, once the main effect of duration was included in the model, there was no significant effect of approach (p = 0.085).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Ahmad, Y., & Smith, P. K. (1990). Behavioral measures: bullying in schools. Newsletter of the Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 12, 26–27. Ahmad, Y., & Smith, P. K. (1990). Behavioral measures: bullying in schools. Newsletter of the Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 12, 26–27.
go back to reference American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63, 852–862.CrossRef American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63, 852–862.CrossRef
go back to reference Bauman, S., Rigby, K., & Hoppa, K. (2008). U.S. teachers’ and school counsellors’ strategies for handling school bullying incidents. Educational Psychology, 28, 837–856.CrossRef Bauman, S., Rigby, K., & Hoppa, K. (2008). U.S. teachers’ and school counsellors’ strategies for handling school bullying incidents. Educational Psychology, 28, 837–856.CrossRef
go back to reference Bradshaw, C. P., Sawyer, A. L., & O’Brennan, L. M. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: perceptual differences between students and school staff. School Psychology Review, 36, 361–382. Bradshaw, C. P., Sawyer, A. L., & O’Brennan, L. M. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: perceptual differences between students and school staff. School Psychology Review, 36, 361–382.
go back to reference Braithwaite, J. (2004). Restorative justice and de-professionalization. The Good Society, 13, 28–31.CrossRef Braithwaite, J. (2004). Restorative justice and de-professionalization. The Good Society, 13, 28–31.CrossRef
go back to reference Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2007). Expectations and perceptions at school transitions: the role of peer status and aggression. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 567–586.CrossRef Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2007). Expectations and perceptions at school transitions: the role of peer status and aggression. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 567–586.CrossRef
go back to reference Dalal, D. K., & Zickar, M. J. (2012). Some common myths about centering predictor variables in moderated multiple regression and polynomial regression. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 339–362.CrossRef Dalal, D. K., & Zickar, M. J. (2012). Some common myths about centering predictor variables in moderated multiple regression and polynomial regression. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 339–362.CrossRef
go back to reference Davis, M. H., & Franzoi, S. (1991). Stability and change in adolescent self-consciousness and empathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 70–87.CrossRef Davis, M. H., & Franzoi, S. (1991). Stability and change in adolescent self-consciousness and empathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 70–87.CrossRef
go back to reference Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F. I. M., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2005). Bullying: who does what, when and where? Involvement of children, teachers and parents in bullying behavior. Health Education Research, 20, 81–91.PubMedCrossRef Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F. I. M., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2005). Bullying: who does what, when and where? Involvement of children, teachers and parents in bullying behavior. Health Education Research, 20, 81–91.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fields, B. A. (2003). Restitution and restorative justice. Youth Studies Australia, 22, 44–51. Fields, B. A. (2003). Restitution and restorative justice. Youth Studies Australia, 22, 44–51.
go back to reference Garandeau, C. F., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). From indirect aggression to invisible aggression: a conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 612–625.CrossRef Garandeau, C. F., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). From indirect aggression to invisible aggression: a conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 612–625.CrossRef
go back to reference Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoe, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33, 467–476.PubMedCrossRef Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoe, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33, 467–476.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hauser, M. (2011). Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative to victims, but lack moral compassion. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 603–608.CrossRef Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hauser, M. (2011). Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative to victims, but lack moral compassion. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 603–608.CrossRef
go back to reference Haataja, A., Sainio, M., Turtonen, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Implementing the KiVa antibullying program: Predicting recognition of victimized students. Manuscript submitted for publication. Haataja, A., Sainio, M., Turtonen, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Implementing the KiVa antibullying program: Predicting recognition of victimized students. Manuscript submitted for publication.
go back to reference Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 69–89.PubMedCrossRef Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 69–89.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Peer interventions in playground bullying. Social Development, 10, 512–527.CrossRef Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Peer interventions in playground bullying. Social Development, 10, 512–527.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T., Alanen, E., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2011a). Going to scale: a nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for comprehensive schools. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 796–805.PubMedCrossRef Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T., Alanen, E., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2011a). Going to scale: a nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for comprehensive schools. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 796–805.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011b). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa anti-bullying program: grades 4–6. Child Development, 82, 311–330.PubMedCrossRef Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011b). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa anti-bullying program: grades 4–6. Child Development, 82, 311–330.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Leff, S. S., Waasdorp, T. E., & Crick, N. R. (2010). A review of existing relational aggression programs: strengths, limitations, and future directions. School Psychology Review, 39, 508–535.PubMedCentralPubMed Leff, S. S., Waasdorp, T. E., & Crick, N. R. (2010). A review of existing relational aggression programs: strengths, limitations, and future directions. School Psychology Review, 39, 508–535.PubMedCentralPubMed
go back to reference Maines, B., & Robinson, G. (1992). The no blame approach. Bristol: Lucky Duck. Maines, B., & Robinson, G. (1992). The no blame approach. Bristol: Lucky Duck.
go back to reference O’Connell, P., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.PubMedCrossRef O’Connell, P., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Olweus, D. (1988). Critical views on the Pikas method. Unpublished paper. Olweus, D. (1988). Critical views on the Pikas method. Unpublished paper.
go back to reference Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge: Blackwell. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge: Blackwell.
go back to reference Pikas, A. (1989). The common concern method for the treatment of mobbing. In E. Roland & E. Munthe (Eds.), Bullying, an international perspective. London: Fulton. Pikas, A. (1989). The common concern method for the treatment of mobbing. In E. Roland & E. Munthe (Eds.), Bullying, an international perspective. London: Fulton.
go back to reference Pikas, A. (2002). New developments of the Shared Concern Method. School Psychology International, 23, 307–336.CrossRef Pikas, A. (2002). New developments of the Shared Concern Method. School Psychology International, 23, 307–336.CrossRef
go back to reference Reijntjes, A. H. A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 244–252.CrossRef Reijntjes, A. H. A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 244–252.CrossRef
go back to reference Rigby, K., & Barnes, A. (2002). To tell or not to tell: the victimized student’s dilemma. Youth Studies, 21, 33–36. Rigby, K., & Barnes, A. (2002). To tell or not to tell: the victimized student’s dilemma. Youth Studies, 21, 33–36.
go back to reference Rigby, K., & Bauman, S. (2010). How school personnel tackle cases of bullying: A critical examination. In S. Jimerson, S. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), The handbook of school bullying: An international perspective (pp. 455–468). New York: Routledge. Rigby, K., & Bauman, S. (2010). How school personnel tackle cases of bullying: A critical examination. In S. Jimerson, S. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), The handbook of school bullying: An international perspective (pp. 455–468). New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Robinson, G., & Maines, B. (2008). Bullying: A complete guide to the Support Group Method. London: Sage. Robinson, G., & Maines, B. (2008). Bullying: A complete guide to the Support Group Method. London: Sage.
go back to reference Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.CrossRef Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, P. K. (2010). Bullying in primary and secondary schools: Psychological and organizational comparisons. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), The handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 137–150). New York: Routledge. Smith, P. K. (2010). Bullying in primary and secondary schools: Psychological and organizational comparisons. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), The handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 137–150). New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Smith, P. K., & Sharp, S. (1994). School bullying: Insights and perspectives. London: Routledge.CrossRef Smith, P. K., & Sharp, S. (1994). School bullying: Insights and perspectives. London: Routledge.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, P. K., & Shu, S. (2000). What good schools can do about bullying: findings from a survey in English schools after a decade of research and action. Childhood, 7, 193–212.CrossRef Smith, P. K., & Shu, S. (2000). What good schools can do about bullying: findings from a survey in English schools after a decade of research and action. Childhood, 7, 193–212.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, P. K., Cowie, H., & Sharp, S. (1994). Working directly with pupils involved in bullying situations. In P. K. Smith & S. Sharp (Eds.), School bullying: Insights and perspectives (pp. 193–212). London: Routledge.CrossRef Smith, P. K., Cowie, H., & Sharp, S. (1994). Working directly with pupils involved in bullying situations. In P. K. Smith & S. Sharp (Eds.), School bullying: Insights and perspectives (pp. 193–212). London: Routledge.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, P. K., Howard, S., & Thompson, F. (2007). Use of the Support Group Method to tackle bullying, and an evaluation from schools and local authorities in England. Pastoral Care in Education, 25, 4–13.CrossRef Smith, P. K., Howard, S., & Thompson, F. (2007). Use of the Support Group Method to tackle bullying, and an evaluation from schools and local authorities in England. Pastoral Care in Education, 25, 4–13.CrossRef
go back to reference Sullivan, K., Cleary, M., & Sullivan, G. (2004). Bullying in secondary schools: What it looks like and how to manage it. London: Paul Chapman. Sullivan, K., Cleary, M., & Sullivan, G. (2004). Bullying in secondary schools: What it looks like and how to manage it. London: Paul Chapman.
go back to reference Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Social cognition and bullying: social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 435–450.CrossRef Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Social cognition and bullying: social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 435–450.CrossRef
go back to reference Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56.CrossRef Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56.CrossRef
go back to reference Vartio, A. (2013). Bullying students’ experiences of a confronting versus a non-confronting approach. Unpublished master’s thesis, Åbo Akademi, Turku, Finland. Vartio, A. (2013). Bullying students’ experiences of a confronting versus a non-confronting approach. Unpublished master’s thesis, Åbo Akademi, Turku, Finland.
go back to reference Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3–25.CrossRef Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3–25.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Tackling Acute Cases of School Bullying in the KiVa Anti-Bullying Program: A Comparison of Two Approaches
Auteurs
Claire F. Garandeau
Elisa Poskiparta
Christina Salmivalli
Publicatiedatum
01-08-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology / Uitgave 6/2014
Print ISSN: 2730-7166
Elektronisch ISSN: 2730-7174
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9861-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2014

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 6/2014 Naar de uitgave