01-11-2013 | Commentary
Strengthening the assessment of factorial invariance across population subgroups: a commentary on Varni et al. (2013)
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 9/2013
Log in om toegang te krijgenAbstract
Objectives
This article provides a commentary in response to “Varni et al. (Qual Life Res. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0370-4, 2013)."
Methods and results
The commentary argues that the approximate model fit indexes commonly used in maximum-likelihood confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance testing are seriously flawed, as they overlook potentially serious model misspecifications that could bias parameter estimates and compromise inference.
Conclusions
Flexible and convenient Bayesian estimation approaches are presented that can substantially aid in: (1) resolving commonly encountered specification errors in confirmatory factor models and (2) locating specific measurement parameters that are non-invariant across population subgroups. It is recommended that these methods should be more widely adopted for evaluating the factorial invariance of patient-reported outcome measures and other types of instruments.