Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0442-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Collaborative research in academic medicine is often inefficient and ineffective. It often fails to leverage the expertise of interdisciplinary team members, does not seek or incorporate team input at opportune times, and creates workload inequities. Adapting approaches developed in venture capital, we created the ‘sprint model’ for writing academic papers based on the analysis of secondary data. The ‘sprint model’ minimizes common barriers that undermine collaboration in academic medicine. This model for team science collaboration begins with team members convening for a highly focused, guided session. In this session, a facilitator moves the group through a structured process to create the study plan. This includes refining the research questions, developing the study design, and prototyping the presentation of results. After adopting this model, our team has drastically reduced time from idea inception to final product submission through increased efficiencies and reduced redundancies. From December 2016 to April 2018, our team has initiated 15 paper sprints. The median time from sprint to submission for paper sprints has been 1.7 months (minimum: 0.5; maximum: 9). Although our current ‘sprint’ approach has already demonstrated a substantial improvement in our ability to rapidly produce high-quality research, we believe the ‘pre-sprint’ preparation and ‘post-sprint’ processes can be further refined. Finally, we discuss the limitations of this model and our efforts to adapt the process to meet the evolving needs of research teams.
How to Conduct Paper Sprints. A more collaborative, efficient and fun way to write academic papers40037_2018_442_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B, Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science. 2007;316:1036–9. CrossRef
Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor BK, Moser RP. The science of team science overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:S77–S89. CrossRef
Miller K. Successful collaborations: social scientists who study science have noticed a trend. In: Biomedical computation review. Simbios at Stanford University, national NIH center for biomedical computing. 2008. pp. 7–15.
Whitfield J. Group theory. Nature. 2008;455:720–3. CrossRef
O’Brien T, Yamamoto K, Hawgood S. Commentary: team science. Acad Med. 2013;88:156–7. CrossRef
Knapp J, Zeratsky J, Kowitz B. Sprint: how to solve big problems and test new ideas in just five days. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2016.
Sheridan R. Joy, inc.: how we built a workplace people love. New York: Penguin Group; 2013.
Markovitz A, Ellimoottil C, Sukul D, et al. Risk-adjustment may lessen penalties on hospitals treating complex cardiac patients under medicare’s bundled payments. Health Aff. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0940.
Ibrahim A, Dimick J, Sinha S, Hollingsworth J, Nuliyalu U, Ryan A. Association of coded severity with readmission reduction after the hospital readmissions reduction program. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:290–2. CrossRef
Ravid K, Faux R, Corkey B, Coleman D. Building interdisciplinary biomedical research using novel collaboratives. Acad Med. 2013;88:179–84. CrossRef
Saunders P. Supporting researchers in an era of team science. Lancet. 2017;389(Supplement):S10–S2. CrossRef
Börner K, Contractor N, Falk-krzesinski HJ, et al. A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:1–6. CrossRef
Disis ML, Slattery JT. The road we must take: multidisciplinary team science. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:1–5. CrossRef
Larson E, Landers T, Begg M. Building interdisciplinary research models: a didactic course to prepare interdisciplinary scholars and faculty. Clin Transl Sci. 2011;4:38–41. CrossRef
Hessels A, Robinson B, O’Rourke M, Begg M, Larson E. Building interdisciplinary research models through interactive education. Clin Transl Sci. 2015;8:793–9. CrossRef
Aboelela SW, Larson E, Bakken S, et al. Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:329–46. CrossRef
Cain S. Quiet: the power of introverts in a world that can’t stop talking. New York: Broadway Books; 2013.
- Sprint to work: A novel model for team science collaboration in academic medicine
Shashank S. Sinha
Tedi A. Engler
Brahmajee K. Nallamothu
Andrew M. Ibrahim
Andrew M. Ryan
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum