Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2004

01-02-2004 | Original Article

Spatial interference and response control in sequence learning: the role of explicit knowledge

Auteurs: Elisabet Tubau, Joan López-Moliner

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2004

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

In several sequence learning studies it has been suggested that response control shifts from the stimuli to some internal representation (i.e., motor program) through the learning process. The main questions addressed in this paper are whether this control shift is related to explicit knowledge and whether the formation of these internal representations depends on the stimulus attributes. In one experiment we compared the learning of a response sequence triggered by either spatial location or location symbol (left-right) by using a serial response task (SRT). Symbols were presented at either a centered or random location. The results showed that in the symbolic conditions the shift of response control correlated with the emergence of explicit knowledge. Only participants with complete explicit knowledge seemed to learn the sequence structure beyond probabilistic information (response time "RT" did not depend on the frequency of the response). Moreover, these participants were able to overcome, when needed, spatial interference (RT was the same for both spatially corresponding and non-corresponding trials). However, when spatial location was relevant, RT was always faster, especially for more frequent responses. These results suggest that the relevant stimulus dimension (location or symbol) seems to engage different sequence learning mechanisms.
Voetnoten
1
We thank Iring Koch for his suggestion for similar analyses involving the sequence structure.
 
2
A pilot study showed that explicit learning was very difficult to obtain in this condition even with intentional instructions (only one-third of the participants were able to write the complete sequence).
 
3
This effect was only marginal in the first random block (p=0.08), probably due to a longer RSI (250 ms) than that observed for the response repetition effect (50 ms).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Baker, J.T., Donoghue, J.P., & Sanes, J.N. (1999). Gaze direction modulates finger movement activation patterns in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 10044–10052. Baker, J.T., Donoghue, J.P., & Sanes, J.N. (1999). Gaze direction modulates finger movement activation patterns in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 10044–10052.
go back to reference Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction time as a function of response versus signal and response repetition. Nature, 205, 217–218. Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction time as a function of response versus signal and response repetition. Nature, 205, 217–218.
go back to reference Bower, G. H., & Winzenz, D. (1969). Group structure, coding, and memory for digit sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 80, 1–17. Bower, G. H., & Winzenz, D. (1969). Group structure, coding, and memory for digit sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 80, 1–17.
go back to reference De Jong, R., Liang, C.C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.PubMed De Jong, R., Liang, C.C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.PubMed
go back to reference Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301–313.CrossRef Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301–313.CrossRef
go back to reference Eliassen, J.C., Souza, T., & Sanes, J.N. (2001). Human brain activation accompanying explicitly directed movement sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 141, 269–280.CrossRef Eliassen, J.C., Souza, T., & Sanes, J.N. (2001). Human brain activation accompanying explicitly directed movement sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 141, 269–280.CrossRef
go back to reference Frensch, P. A. (1994). Composition during serial learning: a serial position effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 423–442.CrossRef Frensch, P. A. (1994). Composition during serial learning: a serial position effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 423–442.CrossRef
go back to reference Frensch, P. A., & Miner, C. S. (1994). Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning. Memory and Cognition, 22, 95–110. Frensch, P. A., & Miner, C. S. (1994). Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning. Memory and Cognition, 22, 95–110.
go back to reference Hazeltine, E., Grafton, S. T., & Ivry, R. (1997). Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding. A PET study. Brain, 120, 123–140.PubMed Hazeltine, E., Grafton, S. T., & Ivry, R. (1997). Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding. A PET study. Brain, 120, 123–140.PubMed
go back to reference Helmuth, L. L., Mayr, U., & Daum, I (2000). Sequence learning in Parkinson's disease: a comparison of spatial attention and number-response sequences. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1143–1451.CrossRef Helmuth, L. L., Mayr, U., & Daum, I (2000). Sequence learning in Parkinson's disease: a comparison of spatial attention and number-response sequences. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1143–1451.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoffmann, J., & Koch, I. (1997). Stimulus-response compatibility and sequential learning in the serial reaction time task. Psychological Research, 60, 87–97. Hoffmann, J., & Koch, I. (1997). Stimulus-response compatibility and sequential learning in the serial reaction time task. Psychological Research, 60, 87–97.
go back to reference Hoffmann, J., & Koch, I. (1998). Implicit learning of loosely defined structures. In M. A. Stadler, & P. A. Frensch (Eds.). Handbook of implicit learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Hoffmann, J., & Koch, I. (1998). Implicit learning of loosely defined structures. In M. A. Stadler, & P. A. Frensch (Eds.). Handbook of implicit learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Hommel, B. (2003). Acquisition and control of voluntary action. In S. Maasen, W. Prinz, & G. Roth (Eds.) Voluntary action: Brains, minds, and sociality (pp. 34–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hommel, B. (2003). Acquisition and control of voluntary action. In S. Maasen, W. Prinz, & G. Roth (Eds.) Voluntary action: Brains, minds, and sociality (pp. 34–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000a). The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 863–882. Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000a). The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 863–882.
go back to reference Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000b). Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks. Psychological Research, 63, 22–35. Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000b). Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks. Psychological Research, 63, 22–35.
go back to reference Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior. The Hixon Symposium (pp. 112–136). New York: Wiley. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior. The Hixon Symposium (pp. 112–136). New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Lawrence, B. M., Myerson, J., Oonk, H. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2001). The effects of eye and limb movements on working memory. Memory, 9, 433–444.CrossRef Lawrence, B. M., Myerson, J., Oonk, H. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2001). The effects of eye and limb movements on working memory. Memory, 9, 433–444.CrossRef
go back to reference Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R.W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: a review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207. Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R.W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: a review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207.
go back to reference Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning. Evidence for independent learning of spatial and non-spatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 350–364.CrossRef Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning. Evidence for independent learning of spatial and non-spatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 350–364.CrossRef
go back to reference Nattkemper, D., & Prinz, W. (1997). Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction task. Psychological Research, 60, 98–112. Nattkemper, D., & Prinz, W. (1997). Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction task. Psychological Research, 60, 98–112.
go back to reference Notebaert, W., Soetens, E., & Melis, A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task—evidence for an attention-shift account. Psychological Research, 65, 170–184.CrossRefPubMed Notebaert, W., Soetens, E., & Melis, A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task—evidence for an attention-shift account. Psychological Research, 65, 170–184.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Posner, M. I. (1992). Attention as a cognitive and neural system. Psychological Science, 1, 11–14. Posner, M. I. (1992). Attention as a cognitive and neural system. Psychological Science, 1, 11–14.
go back to reference Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. (1992). Attentional mechanisms and consciousness experience. In A. D. Milner, & M. D. Rugg (Eds.), The Neuropsychology of Consciousness (pp. 91–111). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. (1992). Attentional mechanisms and consciousness experience. In A. D. Milner, & M. D. Rugg (Eds.), The Neuropsychology of Consciousness (pp. 91–111). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
go back to reference Proctor, R. W., Wang, H., & Kim-Phoung L. (2002). Influences of different combinations of conceptual, perceptual, and structural similarity on stimulus-response compatibility. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 59–74. Proctor, R. W., Wang, H., & Kim-Phoung L. (2002). Influences of different combinations of conceptual, perceptual, and structural similarity on stimulus-response compatibility. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 59–74.
go back to reference Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S. B., & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86–102.CrossRefPubMed Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S. B., & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86–102.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Simon, J. R., & Small, A.M., Jr. (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433–435.PubMed Simon, J. R., & Small, A.M., Jr. (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433–435.PubMed
go back to reference Willingham, D. B. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105, 558–584.CrossRefPubMed Willingham, D. B. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105, 558–584.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 1047–1060.CrossRef Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 1047–1060.CrossRef
go back to reference Zirngibl, C., & Koch, I. (2002). The impact of response mode on implicit and explicit sequence learning. Experimental Psychology, 49, 153–162.CrossRefPubMed Zirngibl, C., & Koch, I. (2002). The impact of response mode on implicit and explicit sequence learning. Experimental Psychology, 49, 153–162.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Spatial interference and response control in sequence learning: the role of explicit knowledge
Auteurs
Elisabet Tubau
Joan López-Moliner
Publicatiedatum
01-02-2004
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2004
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0139-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2004

Psychological Research 1/2004 Naar de uitgave