Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

23-02-2018 | Commentary | Uitgave 4/2018 Open Access

Quality of Life Research 4/2018

Some recommendations for developing multidimensional computerized adaptive tests for patient-reported outcomes

Tijdschrift:
Quality of Life Research > Uitgave 4/2018
Auteurs:
Niels Smits, Muirne C. S. Paap, Jan R. Böhnke
Belangrijke opmerkingen
Niels Smits, Muirne C. S. Paap, and Jan R. Böhnke have contributed equally to the article.

Abstract

Purpose

Multidimensional item response theory and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) are increasingly used in mental health, quality of life (QoL), and patient-reported outcome measurement. Although multidimensional assessment techniques hold promises, they are more challenging in their application than unidimensional ones. The authors comment on minimal standards when developing multidimensional CATs.

Methods

Prompted by pioneering papers published in QLR, the authors reflect on existing guidance and discussions from different psychometric communities, including guidelines developed for unidimensional CATs in the PROMIS project.

Results

The commentary focuses on two key topics: (1) the design, evaluation, and calibration of multidimensional item banks and (2) how to study the efficiency and precision of a multidimensional item bank. The authors suggest that the development of a carefully designed and calibrated item bank encompasses a construction phase and a psychometric phase. With respect to efficiency and precision, item banks should be large enough to provide adequate precision over the full range of the latent constructs. Therefore CAT performance should be studied as a function of the latent constructs and with reference to relevant benchmarks. Solutions are also suggested for simulation studies using real data, which often result in too optimistic evaluations of an item bank’s efficiency and precision.

Discussion

Multidimensional CAT applications are promising but complex statistical assessment tools which necessitate detailed theoretical frameworks and methodological scrutiny when testing their appropriateness for practical applications. The authors advise researchers to evaluate item banks with a broad set of methods, describe their choices in detail, and substantiate their approach for validation.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2018

Quality of Life Research 4/2018 Naar de uitgave