Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

21-08-2024 | Research

Social cues tip the scales in emotional processing of complex pictures

Auteurs: Veronica Dudarev, Victoria Wardell, James T. Enns, Connor M. Kerns, Daniela J. Palombo

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 8/2024

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Perception of a picture is influenced by the social information and emotional value it carries for the viewer. There are still many unanswered questions about how social and emotional processing are related, but it is clear they involve overlapping brain areas and are cognitively interconnected. Yet studies of emotion processing using standardized picture datasets typically leave the social content in the pictures free to vary. In a few studies where the social content has been measured, it correlated with emotional arousal and valence. Here we tested the association between social and emotional content orthogonally, by selecting a similar number of pictures in four categories varying in presence of nonverbal social cues (e.g., gestures, facial expression, body language) and emotional content (neutral, negative). Across two studies, participants (N = 698 in total) provided three ratings for each picture: social relevance (defined as the self-reported use of social cues to understand the picture), valence, and arousal. Despite our best effort to balance the presence of social cues between negative and neutral pictures, ratings of social relevance were strongly associated with ratings of arousal and, to a lesser extent, with valence. These findings likely reflect the intertwined nature of social and emotional processing, which has implications for the neurobiology underlying them, how these systems develop, and how picture databases are used in research.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
We are using “halo effect” in its most generic sense, where it means that if someone has a favorable (or negative) impression of one attribute, they are likely to perceive other, unrelated attributes as also being favorable (or negative). This usage of the term dates to Thorndike (1920), who first described how this phenomenon could lead to systematic biases in various forms of assessments, including questionnaires.
 
2
Both studies were restricted to participants from North America (USA and Canada). £6.00 equals about $7.2.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. The center for research in psychophysiology, University of Florida. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. The center for research in psychophysiology, University of Florida.
go back to reference Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25–29.CrossRef Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25–29.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Social cues tip the scales in emotional processing of complex pictures
Auteurs
Veronica Dudarev
Victoria Wardell
James T. Enns
Connor M. Kerns
Daniela J. Palombo
Publicatiedatum
21-08-2024
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 8/2024
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-02022-y