Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Imagery-based interpretive bias modification (CBM-I) involves repeatedly imagining scenarios that are initially ambiguous before being resolved as either positive or negative in the last word/s. While the presence of such ambiguity is assumed to be important to achieve change in selective interpretation, it is also possible that the act of repeatedly imagining positive or negative events could produce such change in the absence of ambiguity. The present study sought to examine whether the ambiguity in imagery-based CBM-I is necessary to elicit change in interpretive bias, or, if the emotional content of the imagined scenarios is sufficient to produce such change. An imagery-based CBM-I task was delivered to participants in one of four conditions, where the valence of imagined scenarios were either positive or negative, and the ambiguity of the scenario was either present (until the last word/s) or the ambiguity was absent (emotional valence was evident from the start). Results indicate that only those who received scenarios in which the ambiguity was present acquired an interpretive bias consistent with the emotional valence of the scenarios, suggesting that the act of imagining positive or negative events will only influence patterns of interpretation when the emotional ambiguity is a consistent feature.
Arch, J. J., & Craske, M. G. (2009). First-line treatment: A critical appraisal of cognitive behavioral therapy developments and alternatives. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 32(3), 525–547. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2009.05.001.
Barnes, L. L., Harp, D., & Jung, W. S. (2002). Reliability generalization of scores on the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement,62(4), 603–618. CrossRef
Grey, S., & Mathews, A. (2000). Effects of training on interpretation of emotional ambiguity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 53A(4), 1143–1162. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980050156335.
Hoppitt, L., Mathews, A., Yiend, J., & Mackintosh, B. (2010b). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the emotional effects of bias modification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), 312–325. doi: 10.1002/acp.1678.
Lang, T. J., Blackwell, S. E., Harmer, C. J., Davison, P., & Holmes, E. A. (2012). Cognitive bias modification using mental imagery for depression: Developing a novel computerized intervention to change negative thinking styles. European Journal of Personality,26(2), 145–157. doi: 10.1002/per.855. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (2012). Cognitive bias modification approaches to anxiety. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 189–217.
Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (2000). Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109(4), 602–615. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.109.4.602.
Salemink, E., Hertel, P., & Mackintosh, B. (2010). Interpretation training influences memory for prior interpretations. Emotion, 10(6), 903–907. doi: 10.1037/a0020232.
Salemink, E., & van den Hout, M. (2010). Trained interpretive bias survives mood change. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41(3), 310–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.02.010.
Salemink, E., van den Hout, M., & Kindt, M. (2007). Trained interpretive bias and anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(2), 329–340. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.03.011.
Sherman, S. J., Cialdini, R. B., Schwartzman, D. F., & Reynolds, K. D. (1985). Imagining can heighten or lower the perceived likelihood of contracting a disease: The mediating effect of ease of imagery. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,11(1), 118–127. doi: 10.1177/0146167285111011. CrossRef
Spielberger, C., Gorsuch, R., Lushene, R., Vagg, P., & Jacobs, G. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI (Form Y): Self-evaluation questionnaire. Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Wiley.
- Simply Imagining Sunshine, Lollipops and Rainbows Will Not Budge the Bias: The Role of Ambiguity in Interpretive Bias Modification
Patrick J. F. Clarke
Emily A. Holmes
Simon E. Blackwell
- Springer US