Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
In two experiments we evaluated the coactivation of arithmetic facts and the possible inhibitory mechanism used to select the correct one. To this end, we introduced an adapted version of the negative priming paradigm in which participants received additions and they decided whether they were correct or not. When the addition was incorrect but the result was that of multiplying the operands (e.g., 2 + 4 = 8), participants took more time to respond relative to control additions with unrelated results. This finding corroborated that participants coactivated arithmetic facts of multiplications even when they were irrelevant to perform the task. Moreover, the participants were slower to respond to an addition whose result was that of multiplying the operands of the previous trial (e.g., 2 + 6 = 8). These results support the existence of an inhibitory mechanism involved in the selection of arithmetic facts.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Ashcraft, M. H. (1987). Children’s knowledge of simple arithmetic: A developmental model and simulation. In J. Bisanz, C.J. Brainerd, & R. Kail (Eds.), Formal methods in developmental psychology: Progress in cognitive development research (pp. 302–338). New York: Springer.
Censabella, S., & Noël, M. P. (2004). Interference in arithmetic facts: are active suppression processes involved when performing simple mental arithmetic? Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 22, 635–671.
Colomé, A., Bafalluy, M. G., & Noël, M. P. (2011). Getting to the source: a questionnaire on the learning and use of arithmetical operations. Psicológica, 32, 223–253.
Groen, G. J., & Parkman, J. M. (1972). A chronometric analysis of simple addition. Psychological Review, 79, 329–343. CrossRef
Lemaire, P., Fayol, M., & Abdi, H. (1991). Associative confusion effect in cognitive arithmetic: evidence for partially autonomous processes. Current Psychology of Cognition, 11, 587–604.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E–Prime user´s guide (Version 1.1). Pittsburg: Psychology Software Tools.
Siegler, R. S., & Shrager, J. (1984). Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: how do children know what to do? In C. Sophian (Ed.), Origins of cognitive skills (pp. 229–293). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Whalen, J. (2000). The influence of semantic number representations on arithmetic fact retrieval. PhD thesis, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
Winkelman, J. H., & Schmidt, J. (1974). Associative confusions in mental arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 734–736. CrossRef
Zbrodoff, N. J., & Logan, G. D. (2005). What everyone finds: the problem size effect. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 331–346). New York: Psychology Press.
- Simple arithmetic: evidence of an inhibitory mechanism to select arithmetic facts
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg