Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel Explicit knowledge of sensory non-redundancy ca...

volgende artikel Perceived duration of auditory oddballs: test o...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

12-11-2018 | Original Article | Uitgave 4/2020

Short-term upper-limb immobilization alters peripersonal space representation

Tijdschrift:: Psychological Research > Uitgave 4/2020

Auteurs:: Lucette Toussaint, Yannick Wamain, Christel Bidet-Ildei, Yann Coello

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Abstract

Peripersonal space is a multisensory interface between the environment and the body subserving motor interactions with the physical and social world. Although changing body properties has been shown to alter the functional processing of space, little is known about the effect of short-term limb immobilization specifically on the motor representation of peripersonal space. In the present study, we investigated the effect of a right upper-limb immobilization for a duration of 24 h on a reachability judgment task and a brightness judgment task. Analyses of perceptual thresholds revealed a reduction of peripersonal space representation after the immobilization period, which was not observed when there was no immobilization (control group). In contrast, no variation appeared in the brightness judgment task, suggesting no presence of specific visual perception or decisional deficits in the limb immobilization group. Considered together, the results confirm the crucial role of the motor system in the representation of peripersonal space. They also highlight the plasticity of the motor system resulting in a rapid change of its activity following limb immobilization, with a concomitant effect on motor-related perceptual and cognitive processes.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Avanzino, L., Bassolino, M., Pozzo, T., & Bove, M. (2011). Use-dependent hemispheric balance. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 3423–3428. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4893-10.2011. CrossRefPubMed

Bartolo, A., Carlier, M., Hassaini, S., Martin, Y., & Coello, Y. (2014). The perception of peripersonal space in right and left brain damage hemiplegic patients. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00003. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bartolo, A., Rossetti, Y., Revol, P., Urquizar, C., Pisella, L., & Coello, Y. (2018). Reachability judgement in optic ataxia: Effect of peripheral vision on hand and target perception in depth. Cortex, 98, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.05.013. CrossRefPubMed

Bassolino, M., Bove, M., Jacono, M., Fadiga, L., & Pozzo, T. (2012). Functional effect of short-term immobilization: Kinematic changes and recovery on reaching-to-grasp. Neuroscience, 215, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.019. CrossRefPubMed

Bassolino, M., Finisguerra, A., Canzoneri, E., Serino, A., & Pozzo, T. (2015). Dissociating effect of upper limb non-use and overuse on space and body representations. Neuropsychologia, 20, 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia/2014.11.028. CrossRef

Bourgeois, J., & Coello, Y. (2012). Effect of visuomotor calibration and uncertainty on the perception of peripersonal space. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74(6), 1268–1283. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0316-x. CrossRef

Bourgeois, J., Farné, A., & Coello, Y. (2014). Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space. Acta Psychologica, 148, 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.008. CrossRefPubMed

Brouillet, T., Heurley, L., Martin, S., & Brouillet, D. (2010). The embodied cognition theory and the motor component of “yes” and “no” verbal responses. Acta Psychologica, 134, 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.003 CrossRefPubMed

Canzoneri, E., Ubaldi, S., Rastelli, V., Finisquerra, A., Bassolino, M., & Serino, A. (2013). Tool-use reshapes the boundaries of body and peripersonal space representations. Experimental Brain Research, 228(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3532-2. CrossRefPubMed

Cardinali, L., Brozzoli, C., Urquizar, C., Salemme, R., Roy, A. C., & Farnè, A. (2011). When action is not enough: tool-use reveals tactile-dependent access to body schema. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3750–3757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.033. CrossRefPubMed

Cardinali, L., Jacobs, S., Brozzoli, C., Frassinetti, F., Roy, A. C., & Farnè, A. (2012). Grab an object with a tool and change your body: tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3028-5. CrossRefPubMed

Christamn, S. D., & Niebauer, C. L. (1997). The relation between left-right and upper-lower visual field differences. In S. Christman (Ed.), Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing (pp. 263–298). Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossRef

Cléry, J., Guipponi, O., Wardak, C., Hamed, B., S (2015). Neuronal bases of peripersonal and extrapersonal spaces, their plasticity and their dynamics: knowns and unknowns. Neuropsychologia, 70, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.022. CrossRefPubMed

Coello, Y. (2018). Action space representation in social contexts. In Shigemasu, K., Kuwano, S., Sato, T., Matsuzawa, T. (Eds.), Diversity in harmony—insights from psychology. Proceedings of the 31st international congress of psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119362081.ch12. CrossRef

Coello, Y., Bartolo, A., Amiri, B., Houdayer, E., & Derambure, P. (2008). Perceiving what is reachable depends on motor representations: A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Plos One, 3(8), e2862. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002862. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Coello, Y., Bonnotte, I. (2013). The mutual roles of action representations and spatial deictics in French language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2187–2203. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.775596. CrossRef

Coello, Y., Bourgeois, J., & Iachini, T. (2012). Embodied perception of reachable space: how do we manage threatening objects ? Cognitive Processing, 13, S131–S135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0470z. CrossRefPubMed

Coello, Y., & Iachini, T. (2016). Embodied perception of objects and people in space: towards a unified thoretical framework. In Y. Coelle & M. Fischer (Eds.), Foundations of embodied cognition (pp. 198–219). New York: Psychology Press.

Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Langdon, R. (2001). DRC: A Dual Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204. CrossRefPubMed

Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Tieri, G., Sinigaglia, C., & Committeri, G. (2010). Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Experimental Brain Research, 207(1–2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2435-8. CrossRefPubMed

Curcio, C. A., & Allen, K. A. (1990). Topography and ganglion cells in the human retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 300, 5–25. CrossRef

Danckert, J., & Goodale, M. A. (2001). Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field. Experimental Brain Research, 137, 303–308. CrossRef

De Vignemont, F., & Iannetti, G. D. (2015). How many peripersonal spaces? Neuropsychologia, 70, 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.018. CrossRefPubMed

Di Pellegrino, G., & Làdavas, E. (2015). Peripersonal space in the brain. Neuropsychologia, 66, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.011. CrossRefPubMed

Facchini, S., Romani, M., Tinazzi, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2002). Time-related changes of excitability of the human motor system contingent upon immobilization of the ring and little fingers. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 367–375. CrossRef

Grade, S., Pesenti, M., & Edwards, M. G. (2015). Evidence for the embodiment of space perception: concurrent hand but not arm action moderates reachability and egocentric distance perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 862. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00862. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple readout model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565. CrossRef

Graziano, M. S., & Gandhi, S. (2000). Location of the polysensory zone in the precentral gyrus of anesthetized monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 135(2), 259–266. CrossRef

Graziano, M. S., & Cooke, D. F. (2006). Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia, 44(13), 2621–2635. CrossRef

Handy, T. C., Grafton, S. T., Shroff, N. M., Ketay, S., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2003). Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nature Neurosciences, 6, 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1031. CrossRef

Huber, R., Ghilardi, M. F., Massimini, M., Ferrarelli, F., Riedner, B. A., Peterson, M. J., & Tononi, G. (2006). Arm immobilization causes cortical plastic changes and locally decreases sleep slow wave activity. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1169–1176. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1758. CrossRefPubMed

Hunley, S. B., & Lourenco, S. F. (2018). What is peripersonal space? An examination of unresolved empirical issues and emerging findings. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews (Cognitive Science), e1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1472. PubMed

Lakha, L., & Humphreys, G. (2005). Lower visual field advantage for motion segmentation during high competition for selection. Spatial Vision, 18, 447–460. CrossRef

Meugnot, A., Almecija, Y., & Toussaint, L. (2014). The embodied nature of motor imagery processes highlighted by short-term limb immobilization. Experimental Psychology, 61, 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000237. CrossRefPubMed

Meugnot, A., & Toussaint, L. (2015). Functional plasticity of sensorimotor representations following dominant versus non-dominant hand short-term immobilization. Acta Psychologica, 155, 51–56. CrossRef

Moisello, C., Bove, M., Huber, R., Abbruzzese, G., Battaglia, F., Tononi, G., & Ghilardi, M. F. (2008). Short-term limb immobilization affects motor performance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.40.2.165-176. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. CrossRef

Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs, 8(4), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434. CrossRef

Patané, I., Farnè, A., & Frassinetti, F. (2017). Cooperative tool-use reveals peripersonal and interpersonal spaces are dissociable. Cognition, 166, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.013. CrossRefPubMed

Previc, F. H. (1998). The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 123–164. CrossRef

Rizzolatti, G., Scandolara, C., Matelli, M., & Gentilucci, M. (1981). Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses. Behavioral Brain Research, 2(2), 147–163. CrossRef

Ruggiero, G., Frassinetti, F., Coello, Y., Rapuano, M., di Cola, A. S., & Iachini, T. (2017). The effect of facial expressions on peripersonal and interpersonal spaces. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 81(6), 1232–1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0806-x. CrossRefPubMed

Shirley, P., & Morley, K. (2008). Realistic Ray Tracing. Natick: A.K. Peters. CrossRef

Toussaint, L., & Meugnot, A. (2013). Short-term limb immobilization affects cognitive motor processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39, 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028942. CrossRef

Valdés-Conroy, B., Román, F. J., Hinojosa, J. A., & Shorkey, S. P. (2012). So far so good: emotion in the peripersonal/extrapersonal space. PLoS One, 7(11), e49162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049162. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wamain, Y., Gabrielli, F., & Coello, Y. (2016). EEG µ rhythm in virtual reality reveals that motor coding of visual objects in peripersonal space is task dependent. Cortex, 74, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.006. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Short-term upper-limb immobilization alters peripersonal space representation
Auteurs:: Lucette Toussaint
Yannick Wamain
Christel Bidet-Ildei
Yann Coello
Publicatiedatum: 12-11-2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1118-0
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Tijdschrift: Psychological Research An International Journal of Perception, Attention, Memory, and Action
Uitgave 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2020

Learning in the absence of overt practice: a novel (previously unseen) stimulus can trigger retrieval of an unpracticed response

Social inclusion, but not exclusion, delays attentional disengagement from direct gaze

The impact of training methodology and category structure on the formation of new categories from existing knowledge

Thinner than yourself: self-serving bias in body size estimation

Individual movement features during prism adaptation correlate with after-effects and interlimb transfer

An attentional blink in the absence of spatial attention: a cost of awareness?