Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

12-11-2018 | Original Article

Short-term upper-limb immobilization alters peripersonal space representation

Auteurs: Lucette Toussaint, Yannick Wamain, Christel Bidet-Ildei, Yann Coello

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Peripersonal space is a multisensory interface between the environment and the body subserving motor interactions with the physical and social world. Although changing body properties has been shown to alter the functional processing of space, little is known about the effect of short-term limb immobilization specifically on the motor representation of peripersonal space. In the present study, we investigated the effect of a right upper-limb immobilization for a duration of 24 h on a reachability judgment task and a brightness judgment task. Analyses of perceptual thresholds revealed a reduction of peripersonal space representation after the immobilization period, which was not observed when there was no immobilization (control group). In contrast, no variation appeared in the brightness judgment task, suggesting no presence of specific visual perception or decisional deficits in the limb immobilization group. Considered together, the results confirm the crucial role of the motor system in the representation of peripersonal space. They also highlight the plasticity of the motor system resulting in a rapid change of its activity following limb immobilization, with a concomitant effect on motor-related perceptual and cognitive processes.
Literatuur
go back to reference Christamn, S. D., & Niebauer, C. L. (1997). The relation between left-right and upper-lower visual field differences. In S. Christman (Ed.), Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing (pp. 263–298). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef Christamn, S. D., & Niebauer, C. L. (1997). The relation between left-right and upper-lower visual field differences. In S. Christman (Ed.), Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing (pp. 263–298). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef
go back to reference Coello, Y., & Iachini, T. (2016). Embodied perception of objects and people in space: towards a unified thoretical framework. In Y. Coelle & M. Fischer (Eds.), Foundations of embodied cognition (pp. 198–219). New York: Psychology Press. Coello, Y., & Iachini, T. (2016). Embodied perception of objects and people in space: towards a unified thoretical framework. In Y. Coelle & M. Fischer (Eds.), Foundations of embodied cognition (pp. 198–219). New York: Psychology Press.
go back to reference Curcio, C. A., & Allen, K. A. (1990). Topography and ganglion cells in the human retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 300, 5–25.CrossRef Curcio, C. A., & Allen, K. A. (1990). Topography and ganglion cells in the human retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 300, 5–25.CrossRef
go back to reference Danckert, J., & Goodale, M. A. (2001). Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field. Experimental Brain Research, 137, 303–308.CrossRef Danckert, J., & Goodale, M. A. (2001). Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field. Experimental Brain Research, 137, 303–308.CrossRef
go back to reference Facchini, S., Romani, M., Tinazzi, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2002). Time-related changes of excitability of the human motor system contingent upon immobilization of the ring and little fingers. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 367–375.CrossRef Facchini, S., Romani, M., Tinazzi, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2002). Time-related changes of excitability of the human motor system contingent upon immobilization of the ring and little fingers. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 367–375.CrossRef
go back to reference Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple readout model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565.CrossRef Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple readout model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565.CrossRef
go back to reference Graziano, M. S., & Gandhi, S. (2000). Location of the polysensory zone in the precentral gyrus of anesthetized monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 135(2), 259–266.CrossRef Graziano, M. S., & Gandhi, S. (2000). Location of the polysensory zone in the precentral gyrus of anesthetized monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 135(2), 259–266.CrossRef
go back to reference Graziano, M. S., & Cooke, D. F. (2006). Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia, 44(13), 2621–2635.CrossRef Graziano, M. S., & Cooke, D. F. (2006). Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia, 44(13), 2621–2635.CrossRef
go back to reference Huber, R., Ghilardi, M. F., Massimini, M., Ferrarelli, F., Riedner, B. A., Peterson, M. J., & Tononi, G. (2006). Arm immobilization causes cortical plastic changes and locally decreases sleep slow wave activity. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1169–1176. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1758.CrossRefPubMed Huber, R., Ghilardi, M. F., Massimini, M., Ferrarelli, F., Riedner, B. A., Peterson, M. J., & Tononi, G. (2006). Arm immobilization causes cortical plastic changes and locally decreases sleep slow wave activity. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1169–1176. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​nn1758.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hunley, S. B., & Lourenco, S. F. (2018). What is peripersonal space? An examination of unresolved empirical issues and emerging findings. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews (Cognitive Science), e1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1472.PubMed Hunley, S. B., & Lourenco, S. F. (2018). What is peripersonal space? An examination of unresolved empirical issues and emerging findings. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews (Cognitive Science), e1472. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​wcs.​1472.​PubMed
go back to reference Lakha, L., & Humphreys, G. (2005). Lower visual field advantage for motion segmentation during high competition for selection. Spatial Vision, 18, 447–460.CrossRef Lakha, L., & Humphreys, G. (2005). Lower visual field advantage for motion segmentation during high competition for selection. Spatial Vision, 18, 447–460.CrossRef
go back to reference Meugnot, A., & Toussaint, L. (2015). Functional plasticity of sensorimotor representations following dominant versus non-dominant hand short-term immobilization. Acta Psychologica, 155, 51–56.CrossRef Meugnot, A., & Toussaint, L. (2015). Functional plasticity of sensorimotor representations following dominant versus non-dominant hand short-term immobilization. Acta Psychologica, 155, 51–56.CrossRef
go back to reference Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.CrossRef Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.CrossRef
go back to reference Previc, F. H. (1998). The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 123–164.CrossRef Previc, F. H. (1998). The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 123–164.CrossRef
go back to reference Rizzolatti, G., Scandolara, C., Matelli, M., & Gentilucci, M. (1981). Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses. Behavioral Brain Research, 2(2), 147–163.CrossRef Rizzolatti, G., Scandolara, C., Matelli, M., & Gentilucci, M. (1981). Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses. Behavioral Brain Research, 2(2), 147–163.CrossRef
go back to reference Shirley, P., & Morley, K. (2008). Realistic Ray Tracing. Natick: A.K. Peters.CrossRef Shirley, P., & Morley, K. (2008). Realistic Ray Tracing. Natick: A.K. Peters.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Short-term upper-limb immobilization alters peripersonal space representation
Auteurs
Lucette Toussaint
Yannick Wamain
Christel Bidet-Ildei
Yann Coello
Publicatiedatum
12-11-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1118-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2020

Psychological Research 4/2020 Naar de uitgave