Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Review

Sex differences in the weighting of metric and categorical information in spatial location memory

Auteurs: Mark P. Holden, Sarah J. Duff-Canning, Elizabeth Hampson

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

According to the Category Adjustment model, remembering a spatial location involves the Bayesian combination of fine-grained and categorical information about that location, with each cue weighted by its relative certainty. However, individuals may differ in terms of their certainty about each cue, resulting in estimates that rely more or less on metric or categorical representations. To date, though, very little research has examined individual differences in the relative weighting of these cues in spatial location memory. Here, we address this gap in the literature. Participants were asked to recall point locations in uniform geometric shapes and in photographs of complex, natural scenes. Error patterns were analyzed for evidence of a sex difference in the relative use of metric and categorical information. As predicted, women placed relatively more emphasis on categorical cues, while men relied more heavily on metric information. Location reproduction tasks showed a similar effect, implying that the sex difference arises early in spatial processing, possibly during encoding.
Voetnoten
1
An astute observer may note that the average accuracy appears to be much greater in the landscape location memory task than in the circle task. This result may simply be due to the difference in retention interval. However, it is more likely that the difference in accuracy arises from the fact that the spatial categories defined in the circle task (the circle quadrants) were much larger in physical size than the categories defined in the landscapes task (e.g. see Fig. 4). All else being equal, smaller categories will constrain errors to a greater degree than larger ones. Furthermore, the average absolute error in both the circle location memory task and the location reproduction task appear larger than those in the landscape memory task, even though the reproduction task has the smallest retention interval of any of the tasks.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Abramoff, M. D., Magelhaes, P. J., & Ram, S. J. (2004). Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International, 11, 36–42. Abramoff, M. D., Magelhaes, P. J., & Ram, S. J. (2004). Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International, 11, 36–42.
go back to reference Alexander, G. M., Packard, M. G., & Peterson, B. S. (2002). Sex and spatial position effects on object location memory following incidental learning of object identities. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1516–1522.PubMedCrossRef Alexander, G. M., Packard, M. G., & Peterson, B. S. (2002). Sex and spatial position effects on object location memory following incidental learning of object identities. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1516–1522.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Allen, G. L., & Haun, D. B. M. (2004). Proximity and precision in spatial memory. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Human spatial memory: Remembering where (pp. 41–63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Allen, G. L., & Haun, D. B. M. (2004). Proximity and precision in spatial memory. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Human spatial memory: Remembering where (pp. 41–63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Baciu, M., Koenig, O., Vernier, M. P., Bedoin, N., Rubin, C., & Segebarth, C. (1999). Categorical and coordinate spatial relations: fMRI evidence for hemispheric specialization. NeuroReport, 10, 1373–1378.PubMedCrossRef Baciu, M., Koenig, O., Vernier, M. P., Bedoin, N., Rubin, C., & Segebarth, C. (1999). Categorical and coordinate spatial relations: fMRI evidence for hemispheric specialization. NeuroReport, 10, 1373–1378.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Batschelet, E. (1981). Circular statistics in biology. New York: Academic Press. Batschelet, E. (1981). Circular statistics in biology. New York: Academic Press.
go back to reference Blair, J. R., & Spreen, O. (1989). Predicting premorbid IQ: A revision of the National Adult Reading Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 3, 129–136.CrossRef Blair, J. R., & Spreen, O. (1989). Predicting premorbid IQ: A revision of the National Adult Reading Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 3, 129–136.CrossRef
go back to reference Cheng, K., Shettleworth, S. J., Huttenlocher, J., & Rieser, J. J. (2007). Bayesian integration of spatial information. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 625–637.PubMedCrossRef Cheng, K., Shettleworth, S. J., Huttenlocher, J., & Rieser, J. J. (2007). Bayesian integration of spatial information. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 625–637.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Corneille, O., Huart, J., Becquart, E., & Bredart, S. (2004). When memory shifts toward more typical category exemplars: Accentuation effects in the recollection of ethnically ambiguous faces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 236–250.PubMedCrossRef Corneille, O., Huart, J., Becquart, E., & Bredart, S. (2004). When memory shifts toward more typical category exemplars: Accentuation effects in the recollection of ethnically ambiguous faces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 236–250.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Crawford, L. E., Huttenlocher, J., & Engebretson, P. H. (2000). Category effects on estimates of stimuli: Perception or reconstruction? Psychological Science, 11, 280–284.PubMedCrossRef Crawford, L. E., Huttenlocher, J., & Engebretson, P. H. (2000). Category effects on estimates of stimuli: Perception or reconstruction? Psychological Science, 11, 280–284.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dab, I. E., & Robert, M. (2004). Have sex differences in spatial ability evolved from male competition for mating and female concern for survival? Cognition, 91, 221–257.CrossRef Dab, I. E., & Robert, M. (2004). Have sex differences in spatial ability evolved from male competition for mating and female concern for survival? Cognition, 91, 221–257.CrossRef
go back to reference DeLisi, R., Parameswaran, G., & McGillicuddy-DeLisi, A. V. (1989). Age and sex differences in representation of horizontality among children in India. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 739–746.CrossRef DeLisi, R., Parameswaran, G., & McGillicuddy-DeLisi, A. V. (1989). Age and sex differences in representation of horizontality among children in India. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 739–746.CrossRef
go back to reference Deneve, S., & Pouget, A. (2004). Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 98, 249–258.CrossRef Deneve, S., & Pouget, A. (2004). Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 98, 249–258.CrossRef
go back to reference Dent, K. (2009). Coding categorical and coordinate spatial relations in visual-spatial short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2372–2387.CrossRef Dent, K. (2009). Coding categorical and coordinate spatial relations in visual-spatial short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2372–2387.CrossRef
go back to reference Duffy, S., Huttenlocher, J., & Crawford, L. E. (2006). Children sue categories to maximize accuracy in estimation. Developmental Science, 9, 597–603.PubMedCrossRef Duffy, S., Huttenlocher, J., & Crawford, L. E. (2006). Children sue categories to maximize accuracy in estimation. Developmental Science, 9, 597–603.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Eals, M., & Silverman, I. (1994). The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 95–105.CrossRef Eals, M., & Silverman, I. (1994). The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 95–105.CrossRef
go back to reference Ecuyer-Dab, I., & Robert, M. (2007). The female advantage in object location memory according to the foraging hypothesis: A critical analysis. Human Nature, 18, 365–385.CrossRef Ecuyer-Dab, I., & Robert, M. (2007). The female advantage in object location memory according to the foraging hypothesis: A critical analysis. Human Nature, 18, 365–385.CrossRef
go back to reference Ekstrom, R., French, J., Harman, H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services. Ekstrom, R., French, J., Harman, H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.
go back to reference Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 162–169.PubMedCrossRef Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 162–169.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fitting, S., Wedell, D. H., & Allen, G. L. (2007). Memory for spatial location: Cue effects as a function of field rotation. Memory and Cognition, 35, 1641–1658.PubMedCrossRef Fitting, S., Wedell, D. H., & Allen, G. L. (2007). Memory for spatial location: Cue effects as a function of field rotation. Memory and Cognition, 35, 1641–1658.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fitting, S., Wedell, D. H., & Allen, G. L. (2008). Cue usage in memory for location when orientation is fixed. Memory and Cognition, 36, 1196–1216.PubMedCrossRef Fitting, S., Wedell, D. H., & Allen, G. L. (2008). Cue usage in memory for location when orientation is fixed. Memory and Cognition, 36, 1196–1216.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Friedman, A., Brown, N., & McGaffey, A. (2002). A basis for bias in geographical judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 151–159.PubMedCrossRef Friedman, A., Brown, N., & McGaffey, A. (2002). A basis for bias in geographical judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 151–159.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Harshman, R. A., Hampson, E., & Berenbaum, S. A. (1983). Individual differences in cognitive abilities and brain organization, Part I: Sex and handedness differences in ability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 144–192.PubMedCrossRef Harshman, R. A., Hampson, E., & Berenbaum, S. A. (1983). Individual differences in cognitive abilities and brain organization, Part I: Sex and handedness differences in ability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 144–192.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hellige, J. B., & Michimata, C. (1989). Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information. Memory and Cognition, 17, 770–776.PubMedCrossRef Hellige, J. B., & Michimata, C. (1989). Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information. Memory and Cognition, 17, 770–776.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Holden, M. P., Curby, K. M., Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2010). A category adjustment approach to memory for spatial location in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 590–604.PubMedCrossRef Holden, M. P., Curby, K. M., Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2010). A category adjustment approach to memory for spatial location in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 590–604.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Holden, M. P., Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2013). Location memory in the real world: Category adjustment effects in 3-dimensional space. Cognition, 128(1), 45–55.PubMedCrossRef Holden, M. P., Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2013). Location memory in the real world: Category adjustment effects in 3-dimensional space. Cognition, 128(1), 45–55.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Honda, A., & Nihei, Y. (2009). Sex differences in object location memory: The female advantage of immediate detection of changes. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 234–237.CrossRef Honda, A., & Nihei, Y. (2009). Sex differences in object location memory: The female advantage of immediate detection of changes. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 234–237.CrossRef
go back to reference Huart, J., Corneille, O., & Becquart, E. (2005). Face-based categorization, context-based categorization, and distortions in the recollection of gender ambiguous faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 598–608.CrossRef Huart, J., Corneille, O., & Becquart, E. (2005). Face-based categorization, context-based categorization, and distortions in the recollection of gender ambiguous faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 598–608.CrossRef
go back to reference Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Bradburn, N. M. (1990). Reports of elapsed time: Bounding and rounding processes in estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 196–213.PubMedCrossRef Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Bradburn, N. M. (1990). Reports of elapsed time: Bounding and rounding processes in estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 196–213.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., Corrigan, B., & Crawford, L. E. (2004). Spatial categories and the estimation of location. Cognition, 93, 75–97.PubMedCrossRef Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., Corrigan, B., & Crawford, L. E. (2004). Spatial categories and the estimation of location. Cognition, 93, 75–97.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376.PubMedCrossRef Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Prohaska, V. (1988). Hierarchical organization in ordered domains: Estimating the dates of events. Psychological Review, 95, 471–484.CrossRef Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Prohaska, V. (1988). Hierarchical organization in ordered domains: Estimating the dates of events. Psychological Review, 95, 471–484.CrossRef
go back to reference Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (2000). Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 220–241.CrossRef Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (2000). Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 220–241.CrossRef
go back to reference Iachini, T., Sergi, I., Ruggiero, G., & Gnisci, A. (2005). Gender differences in object location memory in a real three-dimensional environment. Brain and Cognition, 59, 52–59.PubMedCrossRef Iachini, T., Sergi, I., Ruggiero, G., & Gnisci, A. (2005). Gender differences in object location memory in a real three-dimensional environment. Brain and Cognition, 59, 52–59.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Intraub, H. (1997). The representation of visual scenes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 217–222.PubMedCrossRef Intraub, H. (1997). The representation of visual scenes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 217–222.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jager, G., & Postma, A. (2003). On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: A review of the current evidence. Neuropsychologia, 41, 504–515.PubMedCrossRef Jager, G., & Postma, A. (2003). On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: A review of the current evidence. Neuropsychologia, 41, 504–515.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference James, T. W., & Kimura, D. (1997). Sex differences in remembering the locations of objects in an array: Location-shifts versus location exchanges. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 155–163.CrossRef James, T. W., & Kimura, D. (1997). Sex differences in remembering the locations of objects in an array: Location-shifts versus location exchanges. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 155–163.CrossRef
go back to reference Kalichman, S. C. (1988). Individual differences in water level task performance: A component skills analysis. Developmental Review, 8, 273–295.CrossRef Kalichman, S. C. (1988). Individual differences in water level task performance: A component skills analysis. Developmental Review, 8, 273–295.CrossRef
go back to reference Kalichman, S. C. (1989). Sex roles and sex differences in adult spatial performance. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 150, 93–100.CrossRef Kalichman, S. C. (1989). Sex roles and sex differences in adult spatial performance. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 150, 93–100.CrossRef
go back to reference Koenig, O., Reiss, L. P., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1990). The development of spatial relation representations: Evidence from studies of cerebral lateralization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 119–130.PubMedCrossRef Koenig, O., Reiss, L. P., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1990). The development of spatial relation representations: Evidence from studies of cerebral lateralization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 119–130.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94, 148–175.PubMedCrossRef Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94, 148–175.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kosslyn, S. M., Koenig, O., Barrett, A., Cave, C. B., Tang, J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1989). Evidence for two types of spatial representations: Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 723–735.PubMed Kosslyn, S. M., Koenig, O., Barrett, A., Cave, C. B., Tang, J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1989). Evidence for two types of spatial representations: Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 723–735.PubMed
go back to reference Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Gitelman, D. R., & Alpert, N. M. (1998). Neural systems that encode categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: PET investigations. Psychobiology, 26, 333–347. Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Gitelman, D. R., & Alpert, N. M. (1998). Neural systems that encode categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: PET investigations. Psychobiology, 26, 333–347.
go back to reference Laeng, B. (1994). Lateralization of categorical and coordinate spatial functions: A study of unilateral stroke patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 189–203.PubMedCrossRef Laeng, B. (1994). Lateralization of categorical and coordinate spatial functions: A study of unilateral stroke patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 189–203.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Laeng, B., & Peters, M. (1995). Cerebral lateralization for the processing of spatial coordinates an categories in left- and right-handers. Neuropsychologia, 33, 421–439.PubMedCrossRef Laeng, B., & Peters, M. (1995). Cerebral lateralization for the processing of spatial coordinates an categories in left- and right-handers. Neuropsychologia, 33, 421–439.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Laeng, B., Peters, M., & McCabe, B. (1998). Memory for locations within regions: Spatial biases and visual hemifield differences. Memory and Cognition, 26, 97–107.PubMedCrossRef Laeng, B., Peters, M., & McCabe, B. (1998). Memory for locations within regions: Spatial biases and visual hemifield differences. Memory and Cognition, 26, 97–107.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Levine, N. (2004). Crimestat III: A spatial statistics program for the analysis of crime incident locations (Version 3.0) [Computer software]. Houston, TX: Ned Levine & Associates and Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Levine, N. (2004). Crimestat III: A spatial statistics program for the analysis of crime incident locations (Version 3.0) [Computer software]. Houston, TX: Ned Levine & Associates and Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
go back to reference Liben, L. S. (1991). Adults’ performance on horizontality tasks: Conflicting frames of reference. Developmental Psychology, 27, 285–294.CrossRef Liben, L. S. (1991). Adults’ performance on horizontality tasks: Conflicting frames of reference. Developmental Psychology, 27, 285–294.CrossRef
go back to reference McBurney, D. H., Gaulin, S. J. C., Devineni, T., & Adams, C. (1997). Superior spatial memory of women: Stronger evidence for the gathering hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 165–174.CrossRef McBurney, D. H., Gaulin, S. J. C., Devineni, T., & Adams, C. (1997). Superior spatial memory of women: Stronger evidence for the gathering hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 165–174.CrossRef
go back to reference Nelson, T. O., & Chaiklin, S. (1980). Immediate memory for spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 529–545. Nelson, T. O., & Chaiklin, S. (1980). Immediate memory for spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 529–545.
go back to reference Newcombe, N. S. (2007). Taking science seriously: Straight thinking about spatial sex differences. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Eminent researchers debate the evidence on a key controversy of our time (pp. 69–78). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Newcombe, N. S. (2007). Taking science seriously: Straight thinking about spatial sex differences. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Eminent researchers debate the evidence on a key controversy of our time (pp. 69–78). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
go back to reference Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2000). Making space: The development of spatial representation and spatial reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2000). Making space: The development of spatial representation and spatial reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Newcombe, N., Huttenlocher, J., Sandberg, E., Lie, E., & Johnson, S. (1999). What do misestimations and asymmetries in spatial judgment indicate about spatial representation? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 986–996.CrossRef Newcombe, N., Huttenlocher, J., Sandberg, E., Lie, E., & Johnson, S. (1999). What do misestimations and asymmetries in spatial judgment indicate about spatial representation? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 986–996.CrossRef
go back to reference Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1967). The child’s conception of space (F. J. Langdon & J. L. Lunzer, Trans.). New York:Norton. (Original work published in 1948). Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1967). The child’s conception of space (F. J. Langdon & J. L. Lunzer, Trans.). New York:Norton. (Original work published in 1948).
go back to reference Postma, A., & De Haan, E. H. F. (1996). What was where? Memory for object locations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 49, 178–199.CrossRef Postma, A., & De Haan, E. H. F. (1996). What was where? Memory for object locations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 49, 178–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Postma, A., Huntjens, R. J. C., Meuwissen, M., & Laeng, B. (2006). The time course of spatial memory processing in the two hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1914–1918.PubMedCrossRef Postma, A., Huntjens, R. J. C., Meuwissen, M., & Laeng, B. (2006). The time course of spatial memory processing in the two hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1914–1918.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Postma, A., Izendoorn, R., & De Haan, E. H. F. (1998). Sex differences and object location memory. Brain and Cognition, 36, 334–345.PubMedCrossRef Postma, A., Izendoorn, R., & De Haan, E. H. F. (1998). Sex differences and object location memory. Brain and Cognition, 36, 334–345.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Postma, A., Jager, G., Kessels, R. P. C., Koppeschaar, H. P. F., & Van Honk, J. (2004a). Sex differences for selective forms of spatial memory. Brain and Cognition, 54, 24–34.PubMedCrossRef Postma, A., Jager, G., Kessels, R. P. C., Koppeschaar, H. P. F., & Van Honk, J. (2004a). Sex differences for selective forms of spatial memory. Brain and Cognition, 54, 24–34.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Postma, A., Kessels, R. P. C., & van Asselen, M. (2004b). The neuropsychology of object location memory. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Human spatial memory: Remembering where (pp. 143–160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Postma, A., Kessels, R. P. C., & van Asselen, M. (2004b). The neuropsychology of object location memory. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Human spatial memory: Remembering where (pp. 143–160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Postma, A., Kessels, R. P. C., & van Asselen, M. (2008). How the brain remembers and forgets where things are: The neurocognition of object-location memory. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 1339–1345.PubMedCrossRef Postma, A., Kessels, R. P. C., & van Asselen, M. (2008). How the brain remembers and forgets where things are: The neurocognition of object-location memory. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 1339–1345.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Postma, A., Winkel, J., Tuiten, A., & van Honk, J. (1999). Sex differences and menstrual cycle effects in human spatial memory. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 24, 175–192.PubMedCrossRef Postma, A., Winkel, J., Tuiten, A., & van Honk, J. (1999). Sex differences and menstrual cycle effects in human spatial memory. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 24, 175–192.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rahman, Q., Abrahams, S., & Jussab, F. (2005). Sex differences in a human analogue of the Radial Arm Maze: The “17-Box Maze Test”. Brain and Cognition, 58, 312–317.PubMedCrossRef Rahman, Q., Abrahams, S., & Jussab, F. (2005). Sex differences in a human analogue of the Radial Arm Maze: The “17-Box Maze Test”. Brain and Cognition, 58, 312–317.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rahman, Q., Bakare, M., & Serinsu, C. (2011). No sex difference in spatial location memory for abstract designs. Brain and Cognition, 76, 15–19.PubMedCrossRef Rahman, Q., Bakare, M., & Serinsu, C. (2011). No sex difference in spatial location memory for abstract designs. Brain and Cognition, 76, 15–19.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Roberson, D., Damjanovic, L., & Pilling, M. (2007). Categorical perception of facial expressions: Evidence for a “category adjustment” model. Memory and Cognition, 35, 1814–1829.PubMedCrossRef Roberson, D., Damjanovic, L., & Pilling, M. (2007). Categorical perception of facial expressions: Evidence for a “category adjustment” model. Memory and Cognition, 35, 1814–1829.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rybash, J. M., & Hoyer, W. J. (1992). Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: A reappraisal. Memory and Cognition, 20, 271–276.PubMedCrossRef Rybash, J. M., & Hoyer, W. J. (1992). Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: A reappraisal. Memory and Cognition, 20, 271–276.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sampaio, C., & Wang, R. F. (2009). Category-based errors and the accessibility of unbiased spatial memories: A retrieval model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1331–1337.PubMedCrossRef Sampaio, C., & Wang, R. F. (2009). Category-based errors and the accessibility of unbiased spatial memories: A retrieval model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1331–1337.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sandberg, E. H., Huttenlocher, J., & Newcombe, N. (1996). The development of hierarchical representation of two-dimensional space. Child Development, 67, 721–739.PubMedCrossRef Sandberg, E. H., Huttenlocher, J., & Newcombe, N. (1996). The development of hierarchical representation of two-dimensional space. Child Development, 67, 721–739.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Saucier, D. M., Shultz, S. R., Keller, A. J., Cook, C. M., & Binsted, G. (2008). Sex differences in object location memory and spatial navigation in Long-Evans rats. Animal Cognition, 11, 129–137.PubMedCrossRef Saucier, D. M., Shultz, S. R., Keller, A. J., Cook, C. M., & Binsted, G. (2008). Sex differences in object location memory and spatial navigation in Long-Evans rats. Animal Cognition, 11, 129–137.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2002). Generalizing the dynamic field theory of the A-not-B error beyond infancy: Three-year-olds’ delay- and experience-dependent location memory biases. Child Development, 73, 377–404.PubMedCrossRef Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2002). Generalizing the dynamic field theory of the A-not-B error beyond infancy: Three-year-olds’ delay- and experience-dependent location memory biases. Child Development, 73, 377–404.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sholl, M. J., & Liben, L. S. (1995). Illusory tilt and Euclidean schemes as factors in performance on the water level task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1624–1638.CrossRef Sholl, M. J., & Liben, L. S. (1995). Illusory tilt and Euclidean schemes as factors in performance on the water level task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1624–1638.CrossRef
go back to reference Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1978). Sex differences in correlations among field-dependence, spatial ability, sex role orientation, and performance on Piaget’s water level task. Developmental Psychology, 14, 689–690.CrossRef Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1978). Sex differences in correlations among field-dependence, spatial ability, sex role orientation, and performance on Piaget’s water level task. Developmental Psychology, 14, 689–690.CrossRef
go back to reference Silverman, I., Choi, J., & Peters, M. (2007a). The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 261–268.PubMedCrossRef Silverman, I., Choi, J., & Peters, M. (2007a). The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 261–268.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Silverman, I., & Eals, M. (1992). Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 533–549). New York: Oxford University Press. Silverman, I., & Eals, M. (1992). Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 533–549). New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Silverman, I., Eals, M., & Peters, M. (2007b). The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 261–268.PubMedCrossRef Silverman, I., Eals, M., & Peters, M. (2007b). The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 261–268.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Simmering, V. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2007). Carving up space at imaginary joints: Can people mentally impose arbitrary spatial category boundaries? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 871–894.PubMed Simmering, V. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2007). Carving up space at imaginary joints: Can people mentally impose arbitrary spatial category boundaries? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 871–894.PubMed
go back to reference Slotnick, S. D., & Moo, L. R. (2006). Prefrontal cortex hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate visual spatial memory. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1560–1568.PubMedCrossRef Slotnick, S. D., & Moo, L. R. (2006). Prefrontal cortex hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate visual spatial memory. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1560–1568.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Spencer, J. P., & Hund, A. M. (2002). Prototypes and particulars: Geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 16–37.CrossRef Spencer, J. P., & Hund, A. M. (2002). Prototypes and particulars: Geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 16–37.CrossRef
go back to reference Spencer, J. P., Simmering, V. R., & Schutte, A. R. (2006). Toward a formal theory of flexible spatial behavior: Geometric category biases generalize across pointing and verbal response types. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 473–490.PubMed Spencer, J. P., Simmering, V. R., & Schutte, A. R. (2006). Toward a formal theory of flexible spatial behavior: Geometric category biases generalize across pointing and verbal response types. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 473–490.PubMed
go back to reference Stevens, A., & Coupe, P. (1978). Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 422–437.PubMedCrossRef Stevens, A., & Coupe, P. (1978). Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 422–437.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Thomas, H., Jamison, W., & Hummel, D. D. (1973). Observation is insufficient for discovering that surface of still water is invariantly horizontal. Science, 181, 173–174.PubMedCrossRef Thomas, H., Jamison, W., & Hummel, D. D. (1973). Observation is insufficient for discovering that surface of still water is invariantly horizontal. Science, 181, 173–174.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Trojano, L., Conson, M., Maffei, R., & Grossi, D. (2006). Categorical and coordinate spatial processing in the imagery domain investigated by rTMS. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1569–1574.PubMedCrossRef Trojano, L., Conson, M., Maffei, R., & Grossi, D. (2006). Categorical and coordinate spatial processing in the imagery domain investigated by rTMS. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1569–1574.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Trojano, L., Grossi, D., Linden, D. E. J., Formisano, E., Goebel, R., Cirillo, S., et al. (2002). Coordinate and categorical judgments in spatial imagery: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1666–1674.PubMedCrossRef Trojano, L., Grossi, D., Linden, D. E. J., Formisano, E., Goebel, R., Cirillo, S., et al. (2002). Coordinate and categorical judgments in spatial imagery: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1666–1674.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tversky, B. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407–433.CrossRef Tversky, B. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407–433.CrossRef
go back to reference Tversky, B. (2000). Remembering spaces. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Handbook of memory (pp. 363–378). New York: Oxford University Press. Tversky, B. (2000). Remembering spaces. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Handbook of memory (pp. 363–378). New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Twyman, A. D., Newcombe, N. S., & Gould, T. J. (2013). Malleability in the development of spatial reorientation. Developmental Psychobiology, 55, 243–255.PubMedCrossRef Twyman, A. D., Newcombe, N. S., & Gould, T. J. (2013). Malleability in the development of spatial reorientation. Developmental Psychobiology, 55, 243–255.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Uttal, D. H., Friedman, A., Hand, L. L., & Warren, C. (2010). Learning fine-grained and category information in a navigable real-world space. Memory and Cognition, 38, 1026–1040.PubMedCrossRef Uttal, D. H., Friedman, A., Hand, L. L., & Warren, C. (2010). Learning fine-grained and category information in a navigable real-world space. Memory and Cognition, 38, 1026–1040.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Van der Ham, I. J. M., & Borst, G. (2011). Individual differences in spatial relation processing: Effects of strategy, ability, and gender. Brain and Cognition, 76, 184–190.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Van der Ham, I. J. M., & Borst, G. (2011). Individual differences in spatial relation processing: Effects of strategy, ability, and gender. Brain and Cognition, 76, 184–190.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Van der Ham, I. J. M., Raemaekers, M., van Wezel, R. J. A., Oleksiak, A., & Postma, A. (2009). Categorical and coordinate spatial relations in working memory: An fMRI study. Brain Research, 1297, 70–79.PubMedCrossRef Van der Ham, I. J. M., Raemaekers, M., van Wezel, R. J. A., Oleksiak, A., & Postma, A. (2009). Categorical and coordinate spatial relations in working memory: An fMRI study. Brain Research, 1297, 70–79.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Van der Ham, I. J. M., van Wezel, R. J. A., Oleksiak, A., & Postma, A. (2007). The time course of hemispheric differences in categorical and coordinate spatial processing. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2492–2498.PubMedCrossRef Van der Ham, I. J. M., van Wezel, R. J. A., Oleksiak, A., & Postma, A. (2007). The time course of hemispheric differences in categorical and coordinate spatial processing. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2492–2498.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Van der Ham, I. J. M., van Zandvoort, M. J. E., Frijns, C. J. M., Kappelle, L. J., & Postma, A. (2011). Hemispheric differences in spatial relation processing in a scene perception task: A neuropsychological study. Neuropsychologia, 49, 999–1005.PubMedCrossRef Van der Ham, I. J. M., van Zandvoort, M. J. E., Frijns, C. J. M., Kappelle, L. J., & Postma, A. (2011). Hemispheric differences in spatial relation processing in a scene perception task: A neuropsychological study. Neuropsychologia, 49, 999–1005.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vasta, R., Belongia, C., & Ribble, C. (1994). Investigating the orientation effect on the water-level task: Who? When? And why? Developmental Psychology, 30, 893–904.CrossRef Vasta, R., Belongia, C., & Ribble, C. (1994). Investigating the orientation effect on the water-level task: Who? When? And why? Developmental Psychology, 30, 893–904.CrossRef
go back to reference Vasta, R., Knott, J. A., & Gaze, C. E. (1996). Can spatial training erase the gender differences on the water-level task? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 549–567.CrossRef Vasta, R., Knott, J. A., & Gaze, C. E. (1996). Can spatial training erase the gender differences on the water-level task? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 549–567.CrossRef
go back to reference Vasta, R., & Liben, L. S. (1996). The water-level task: An intriguing puzzle. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 171–177.CrossRef Vasta, R., & Liben, L. S. (1996). The water-level task: An intriguing puzzle. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 171–177.CrossRef
go back to reference Vasta, R., Rosenberg, D., Knott, J. A., & Gaze, C. E. (1997). Experience and the water-level task revisited: Does expertise exact a price? Psychological Science, 8, 336–339.CrossRef Vasta, R., Rosenberg, D., Knott, J. A., & Gaze, C. E. (1997). Experience and the water-level task revisited: Does expertise exact a price? Psychological Science, 8, 336–339.CrossRef
go back to reference Verbeek, E., & Spetch, M. (2008). Distortions in location memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 328–336.PubMedCrossRef Verbeek, E., & Spetch, M. (2008). Distortions in location memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 328–336.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vernon, P. E. (1971). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen. Vernon, P. E. (1971). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen.
go back to reference Voyer, D., Postma, A., Brake, B., & McGinley, J. I. (2007). Gender differences in object location memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 23–28.PubMedCrossRef Voyer, D., Postma, A., Brake, B., & McGinley, J. I. (2007). Gender differences in object location memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 23–28.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wechsler, D. (1981). The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation. Wechsler, D. (1981). The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
go back to reference Wedell, D. H., Fitting, S., & Allen, G. L. (2007). Shape effects on memory for location. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 681–686.PubMedCrossRef Wedell, D. H., Fitting, S., & Allen, G. L. (2007). Shape effects on memory for location. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 681–686.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Werner, S., & Diedrichsen, J. (2002). The time course of spatial memory distortions. Memory and Cognition, 30, 718–730.PubMedCrossRef Werner, S., & Diedrichsen, J. (2002). The time course of spatial memory distortions. Memory and Cognition, 30, 718–730.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Williams, C. L., Barnett, A. M., & Meck, W. H. (1990). Organizational effects of early gonadal secretions on sexual differentiation in spatial memory. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 84–97.PubMedCrossRef Williams, C. L., Barnett, A. M., & Meck, W. H. (1990). Organizational effects of early gonadal secretions on sexual differentiation in spatial memory. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 84–97.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wittig, M. A., & Allen, M. J. (1984). Measurement of adult performance on Piaget water horizontality task. Intelligence, 8, 305–313.CrossRef Wittig, M. A., & Allen, M. J. (1984). Measurement of adult performance on Piaget water horizontality task. Intelligence, 8, 305–313.CrossRef
go back to reference Zar, J. H. (1998). Biostatistical analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Zar, J. H. (1998). Biostatistical analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Metagegevens
Titel
Sex differences in the weighting of metric and categorical information in spatial location memory
Auteurs
Mark P. Holden
Sarah J. Duff-Canning
Elizabeth Hampson
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0539-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2015

Psychological Research 1/2015 Naar de uitgave