Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 2/2013

01-03-2013 | Original Article

Setting sights higher: category-level attentional set modulates sustained inattentional blindness

Auteur: Steven B. Most

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Previous research has shown that inattentional blindness is modulated by how people tune their “attentional set”: the more featurally similar the unexpected object is to what people are trying to attend, the more likely it is that they will notice it. The experiments in this paper show that people can also establish attentional sets based on semantic categories, and that these high-level attentional sets modulate sustained inattentional blindness. In “Experiment 1”, participants tracked four moving numbers and ignored four moving letters or vice versa, and the unexpected object was either a capital letter ‘E’ or its reverse, a block-like number ‘3’. Despite their featural similarity, participants were more likely to notice the unexpected object belonging to the same category as the tracked objects. “Experiment 2” replicated this effect in conditions where the unexpected object possessed a unique luminance and was less likely simply to be confused with other display items.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
On the critical trials across conditions, 7 participants responding affirmatively were coded as non-noticers: 2 described one of the original distractors, 3 were not sure or could not remember what they had seen, and 1 reported a stimulus unlike any in the display. Four responding negatively were coded as noticers, having given partial or precise descriptions in response to question 2.
 
2
Due to experimenter error, this data was only available in conditions where the unexpected object was an ‘E’.
 
3
Although this change decreased the contrast between the unexpected object and the background, noticing did not decrease overall. Rates of noticing the gray ‘E’ in both conditions were comparable to rates of noticing the black ‘E’ in Experiment 1. Such a pattern is consistent with previous findings that the role of “bottom-up” salience in the noticing of an unexpected object is substantially weaker than the role of attentional set (Most et al., 2005). In a previous experiment using a similar task, participants failed to see even a bright red object that was completely unique in the display (Most et al., 2001).
 
4
One participant failed to circle a forced-choice option on the critical trial and was not included in this test. However, she answered all other questions incorrectly and was included as a non-noticer on subsequent tests.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Becklen, R., & Cervone, D. (1983). Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events. Memory and Cognition, 11(6), 601–608.CrossRef Becklen, R., & Cervone, D. (1983). Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events. Memory and Cognition, 11(6), 601–608.CrossRef
go back to reference Brand, J. (1971). Classification without identification in visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 178–186.PubMedCrossRef Brand, J. (1971). Classification without identification in visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 178–186.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Broadbent, D. E. (1957). A mechanical model for human attention and immediate memory. Psychological Review, 64(3), 205–215.PubMedCrossRef Broadbent, D. E. (1957). A mechanical model for human attention and immediate memory. Psychological Review, 64(3), 205–215.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cartwright-Finch, U., & Lavie, N. (2007). The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition, 102, 321–340.PubMedCrossRef Cartwright-Finch, U., & Lavie, N. (2007). The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition, 102, 321–340.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Comtois, R. (2002). VisionShell PPC. [Software libraries]. Cambridge, MA: author. Comtois, R. (2002). VisionShell PPC. [Software libraries]. Cambridge, MA: author.
go back to reference Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80–90.PubMedCrossRef Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80–90.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030–1044.PubMedCrossRef Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030–1044.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hurt, H. H., Ouellet, J. V., & Thom, D. R. (1981). Motorcycle accident cause factors and identification of countermeasures. (DOT HS 805 862). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Hurt, H. H., Ouellet, J. V., & Thom, D. R. (1981). Motorcycle accident cause factors and identification of countermeasures. (DOT HS 805 862). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
go back to reference Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A. (2007). How meaning shapes seeing. Psychological Science, 18, 845–849.PubMedCrossRef Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A. (2007). How meaning shapes seeing. Psychological Science, 18, 845–849.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Luck, S. J., & Vecera, S. P. (2002). Attention. In H. Pashler & S. Yantis (Eds.), Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology: Volume 1. Sensation & Perception (3rd ed. ed.). New York: Wiley. Luck, S. J., & Vecera, S. P. (2002). Attention. In H. Pashler & S. Yantis (Eds.), Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology: Volume 1. Sensation & Perception (3rd ed. ed.). New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Most, S. B. (2010). What’s “inattentional” about inattentional blindness? Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 1102–1104.PubMedCrossRef Most, S. B. (2010). What’s “inattentional” about inattentional blindness? Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 1102–1104.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Most, S. B., & Astur, R. S. (2007). Feature-based attentional set as a cause of traffic accidents. Visual Cognition, 15, 125–132.CrossRef Most, S. B., & Astur, R. S. (2007). Feature-based attentional set as a cause of traffic accidents. Visual Cognition, 15, 125–132.CrossRef
go back to reference Most, S. B., Clifford, E. R., Scholl, B. J., & Simons, D. J. (2005). What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review, 112, 217–242.PubMedCrossRef Most, S. B., Clifford, E. R., Scholl, B. J., & Simons, D. J. (2005). What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review, 112, 217–242.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., & Chabris, C. F. (2001). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science, 12(1), 9–17.PubMedCrossRef Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., & Chabris, C. F. (2001). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science, 12(1), 9–17.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Neisser, U. (1979). The control of information pickup in selective looking. In A. D. Pick (Ed.), Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson (pp. 201–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Neisser, U. (1979). The control of information pickup in selective looking. In A. D. Pick (Ed.), Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson (pp. 201–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference Simons, D. J. (2000). Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 147–155.PubMedCrossRef Simons, D. J. (2000). Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 147–155.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074.PubMedCrossRef Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Setting sights higher: category-level attentional set modulates sustained inattentional blindness
Auteur
Steven B. Most
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0379-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2013

Psychological Research 2/2013 Naar de uitgave