Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2015

01-07-2015 | Original Article

Sensory–motor properties of past actions bias memory in a recognition task

Auteurs: Denis Brouillet, Caroline Vagnot, Audrey Milhau, Lionel Brunel, Johan Briglia, Rémy Versace, Stéphane Rousset

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The aim of this study was to show that sensory–motor consequences of past actions form part of memory trace components cued by current experience. In a first task participants had to learn a list of words. Then in a guessing task they played against the computer. Finally, in a recognition task, they had to judge if the words were or were not present in the learning task. Words appeared either in the colour associated with success or failure in the guessing task, or in a non-informative colour. In the first experiment, results show that when the words to be judged were in the colour associated with success, participants answered faster and produced more “old” responses than when the words to be judged were in the colour associated with failure in the previous task. Moreover, when the words to be judged were in the colour associated with failure, participants were slower and produced less “old” responses than when the words were in a colour not informative of success or failure. The second experiment confirms that the results obtained in Experiment 1 were linked to the sensory–motor consequences of past actions associated with the colour and not to the colour itself.
Voetnoten
1
A' = 1−xy, xy = (x + y)/4, x = p(FA)/p(HIT), y = p(O)/p(CR).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Arndt, J. (2006). Distinctive information and false recognition: the contribution of encoding and retrieval factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(1), 113–130.CrossRef Arndt, J. (2006). Distinctive information and false recognition: the contribution of encoding and retrieval factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(1), 113–130.CrossRef
go back to reference Borghi, A. M. (2004). Object concepts and action: extracting affordances from objects parts. Acta Psychologica, 115, 69–96.PubMedCrossRef Borghi, A. M. (2004). Object concepts and action: extracting affordances from objects parts. Acta Psychologica, 115, 69–96.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Borghi, A. M. (2005). Object concepts and action. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: the role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 8–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Borghi, A. M. (2005). Object concepts and action. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: the role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 8–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. (2010). Embodied cognition and beyond: acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia, 48, 763–773.PubMedCrossRef Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. (2010). Embodied cognition and beyond: acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia, 48, 763–773.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Brouillet, T., Heurley, L., Martin, S., & Brouillet, D. (2010). The embodied cognition theory and the motor component of “yes” and “no” verbal responses. Acta Psychologica, 134, 310–317.PubMedCrossRef Brouillet, T., Heurley, L., Martin, S., & Brouillet, D. (2010). The embodied cognition theory and the motor component of “yes” and “no” verbal responses. Acta Psychologica, 134, 310–317.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Coello, Y., & Bartolo, A. (2012). Language and action in cognitive neuroscience. Hove: Psychology Press. Coello, Y., & Bartolo, A. (2012). Language and action in cognitive neuroscience. Hove: Psychology Press.
go back to reference Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(3), 275–277.CrossRef Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(3), 275–277.CrossRef
go back to reference Donaldson, W. (1993). Accuracy of d′ and A′ as estimates of sensitivity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(4), 271–274.CrossRef Donaldson, W. (1993). Accuracy of d′ and A′ as estimates of sensitivity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(4), 271–274.CrossRef
go back to reference Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 451–471.PubMedCrossRef Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 451–471.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Estes, Z., & Adelman, J. S. (2008). Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general. Emotion, 8, 453–457.CrossRef Estes, Z., & Adelman, J. S. (2008). Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general. Emotion, 8, 453–457.CrossRef
go back to reference Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 825–850.PubMedCrossRef Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 825–850.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55.PubMed Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55.PubMed
go back to reference Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: a theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48–7, 905–922.CrossRef Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: a theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48–7, 905–922.CrossRef
go back to reference Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565.CrossRef Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565.CrossRef
go back to reference Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA 2: a simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 76, 96–101.CrossRef Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA 2: a simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 76, 96–101.CrossRef
go back to reference Hintzman, D. L. (1986). ‘Schema abstraction’ in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411–428.CrossRef Hintzman, D. L. (1986). ‘Schema abstraction’ in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411–428.CrossRef
go back to reference Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95(4), 528–551.CrossRef Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95(4), 528–551.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1996). The cognitive representation of action: automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176–186.PubMedCrossRef Hommel, B. (1996). The cognitive representation of action: automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176–186.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (2013). Ideomotor action control: on the perceptual grounding of voluntary actions and agents. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action science: foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 113–136). Cambridge: MIT Press. Hommel, B. (2013). Ideomotor action control: on the perceptual grounding of voluntary actions and agents. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action science: foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 113–136). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.PubMedCrossRef Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology, Harward University Press, 1983, p. 1328. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology, Harward University Press, 1983, p. 1328.
go back to reference Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481–537.PubMedCrossRef Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481–537.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Labeye, E., Oker, A., Badard, G., & Versace, R. (2008). Activation and integration of motor components in a short-term priming paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 129, 108–111.PubMedCrossRef Labeye, E., Oker, A., Badard, G., & Versace, R. (2008). Activation and integration of motor components in a short-term priming paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 129, 108–111.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Madan, C. R., & Singhal, A. (2012a). Using actions to enhance memory: effects of enactment, gestures, and exercise on human memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 507.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Madan, C. R., & Singhal, A. (2012a). Using actions to enhance memory: effects of enactment, gestures, and exercise on human memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 507.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Madan, C., & Singhal, A. (2012b). Encoding the world around us: motor-related processing influences verbal memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1563–1570.PubMedCrossRef Madan, C., & Singhal, A. (2012b). Encoding the world around us: motor-related processing influences verbal memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1563–1570.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nairne, J. S. (2006). Modeling distinctiveness: implications for general memory theory. In R. R. Hunt & J. B. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 27–46). New York: Oxford University Press. Nairne, J. S. (2006). Modeling distinctiveness: implications for general memory theory. In R. R. Hunt & J. B. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 27–46). New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2008). Adaptive memory: is survival processing special? Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 377–385.CrossRef Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2008). Adaptive memory: is survival processing special? Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 377–385.CrossRef
go back to reference Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2010). Adaptive memory: ancestral priorities and the mnemonic value of survival processing. Cognitive Processing, 61, 1–22. Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2010). Adaptive memory: ancestral priorities and the mnemonic value of survival processing. Cognitive Processing, 61, 1–22.
go back to reference Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge: MIT Press. Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.CrossRef Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.CrossRef
go back to reference Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
go back to reference Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 943–974.PubMedCrossRef Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 943–974.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stock, A., & Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological Research, 68(2–3), 176–188.PubMedCrossRef Stock, A., & Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological Research, 68(2–3), 176–188.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tulving, E. (1995). Organization of memory: Quo vadis? In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 839–847). Cambridge: MIT Press. Tulving, E. (1995). Organization of memory: Quo vadis? In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 839–847). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Versace, R., Labeye, E., Badard, G., & Rose, M. (2009). The contents of long-term memory and emergence. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 522–560.CrossRef Versace, R., Labeye, E., Badard, G., & Rose, M. (2009). The contents of long-term memory and emergence. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 522–560.CrossRef
go back to reference Versace, R., Vallet, G., Riou, B., Lesourd, M., Labeye, E., & Brunel, L. (2014). Act-In: an integrated view of memory mechanisms. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 280–306. Versace, R., Vallet, G., Riou, B., Lesourd, M., Labeye, E., & Brunel, L. (2014). Act-In: an integrated view of memory mechanisms. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 280–306.
go back to reference Wentura, D., Rothermund, K., & Bak, P. (2000). Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1024–1037.PubMedCrossRef Wentura, D., Rothermund, K., & Bak, P. (2000). Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1024–1037.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1989). Selective attention, variable processing, and distributed representation: preserving particular experiences of general structures. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 76–101). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1989). Selective attention, variable processing, and distributed representation: preserving particular experiences of general structures. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 76–101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Zwaan, R. A., Madden, C. J., Yaxley, R. H., & Aveyard, M. E. (2004). Moving words: dynamic representations in language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 28, 611–619. Zwaan, R. A., Madden, C. J., Yaxley, R. H., & Aveyard, M. E. (2004). Moving words: dynamic representations in language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 28, 611–619.
Metagegevens
Titel
Sensory–motor properties of past actions bias memory in a recognition task
Auteurs
Denis Brouillet
Caroline Vagnot
Audrey Milhau
Lionel Brunel
Johan Briglia
Rémy Versace
Stéphane Rousset
Publicatiedatum
01-07-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0600-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2015

Psychological Research 4/2015 Naar de uitgave