Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The aim of this study was to show that sensory–motor consequences of past actions form part of memory trace components cued by current experience. In a first task participants had to learn a list of words. Then in a guessing task they played against the computer. Finally, in a recognition task, they had to judge if the words were or were not present in the learning task. Words appeared either in the colour associated with success or failure in the guessing task, or in a non-informative colour. In the first experiment, results show that when the words to be judged were in the colour associated with success, participants answered faster and produced more “old” responses than when the words to be judged were in the colour associated with failure in the previous task. Moreover, when the words to be judged were in the colour associated with failure, participants were slower and produced less “old” responses than when the words were in a colour not informative of success or failure. The second experiment confirms that the results obtained in Experiment 1 were linked to the sensory–motor consequences of past actions associated with the colour and not to the colour itself.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Arndt, J. (2006). Distinctive information and false recognition: the contribution of encoding and retrieval factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(1), 113–130. CrossRef
Borghi, A. M. (2005). Object concepts and action. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: the role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 8–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Coello, Y., & Bartolo, A. (2012). Language and action in cognitive neuroscience. Hove: Psychology Press.
Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(3), 275–277. CrossRef
Donaldson, W. (1993). Accuracy of d′ and A′ as estimates of sensitivity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(4), 271–274. CrossRef
Estes, Z., & Adelman, J. S. (2008). Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general. Emotion, 8, 453–457. CrossRef
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55. PubMed
Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: a theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48–7, 905–922. CrossRef
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. CrossRef
Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA 2: a simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 76, 96–101. CrossRef
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). ‘Schema abstraction’ in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411–428. CrossRef
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95(4), 528–551. CrossRef
Hommel, B. (2013). Ideomotor action control: on the perceptual grounding of voluntary actions and agents. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action science: foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 113–136). Cambridge: MIT Press.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology, Harward University Press, 1983, p. 1328.
Nairne, J. S. (2006). Modeling distinctiveness: implications for general memory theory. In R. R. Hunt & J. B. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 27–46). New York: Oxford University Press.
Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2008). Adaptive memory: is survival processing special? Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 377–385. CrossRef
Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2010). Adaptive memory: ancestral priorities and the mnemonic value of survival processing. Cognitive Processing, 61, 1–22.
Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154. CrossRef
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
Tulving, E. (1995). Organization of memory: Quo vadis? In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 839–847). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Versace, R., Labeye, E., Badard, G., & Rose, M. (2009). The contents of long-term memory and emergence. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 522–560. CrossRef
Versace, R., Vallet, G., Riou, B., Lesourd, M., Labeye, E., & Brunel, L. (2014). Act-In: an integrated view of memory mechanisms. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 280–306.
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1989). Selective attention, variable processing, and distributed representation: preserving particular experiences of general structures. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 76–101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zwaan, R. A., Madden, C. J., Yaxley, R. H., & Aveyard, M. E. (2004). Moving words: dynamic representations in language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 28, 611–619.
- Sensory–motor properties of past actions bias memory in a recognition task
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg