Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

03-09-2016

Self-management behavior among patients with diabetic retinopathy in the community: a structural equation model

Auteurs: Li Yang, Qunhong Wu, Yanhua Hao, Yu Cui, Libo Liang, Lijun Gao, Mingli Jiao, Ning Ning, Hong Sun, Zheng Kang, Liyuan Han, Ye Li, Hui Yin

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 2/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is an important, chronic complication of diabetes, requiring competent self-management that depends on adherence to behavioral regimens. This study attempted to identify factors influencing self-management behaviors and develop a model illustrating the interdependence of several factors associated with DR patients.

Methods

In June–December 2012, 368 patients with DR completed questionnaires assessing self-management behavior, diabetes knowledge, health beliefs, social support, and treatment adherence. Structural equation modeling was used to test predicted pathways linking self-management behavior to diabetes knowledge, health beliefs, social support, and treatment adherence.

Results

The results indicated that health beliefs, treatment adherence, and duration of diabetes each had a direct impact on diabetes self-management (p < 0.05). Diabetes knowledge only indirectly influenced diabetes self-management, through health beliefs. Social support had a direct impact on diabetes self-management (β = 0.35, p < 0.01), and an indirect influence on diabetes self-management, through treatment adherence (β = 0.77, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Health beliefs, treatment adherence, and social support directly affect diabetes self-management, and diabetes knowledge indirectly affects diabetes self-management. This suggests that enhancing DR patients’ health beliefs, treatment adherence, and social support would facilitate their diabetes self-management. Meanwhile, improved health education can strengthen diabetes knowledge, which in turn, can positively affect diabetes self-management.
vorige artikel Recent viral infection in US blood donors and health-related quality of life (HRQOL)
volgende artikel Long-term effects of a dyadic psycho-educational intervention on caregiver burden and morbidity in partners of patients with heart failure: a randomized controlled trial
Literatuur
1.
Nagelkerk, J., Reick, K., & Meengs, L. (2006). Perceived barriers and effective strategies to diabetes self-management. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 54(2), 151–158.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Tumosa, N. (2008). Eye disease and the older diabetic. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 24(3), 515–527.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Glasgow, R. E., & Anderson, R. M. (1999). In diabetes care, moving from compliance to adherence is not enough. Something entirely different is needed. Diabetes Care, 22(12), 2090–2092.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Peeples, M., Tomky, D., Mulcahy, K., Peyrot, M., & Siminerio, L. (2007). Evolution of the American Association of Diabetes Educators diabetes education outcomes project. The Diabetes Educator, 33(5), 794–817.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Sousa, V. D., Zauszniewski, J. A., Musil, C. M., Price, L. P. J., & Davis, S. A. (2005). Relationships among self-care agency, self-efficacy, self-care, and glycemic control. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 19(3), 217–230.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Funnell, M. M., Brown, T. L., Childs, B. P., Haas, L. B., Hosey, G. M., Jensen, B., et al. (2012). National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care, 35(Suppl 1), S101–S108.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Patel, A., MacMahon, S., Chalmers, J., Neal, B., Billot, L., Woodward, M., et al. (2008). Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. The New England Journal of medicine, 358(24), 2560–2572.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Yu, D. S., Lee, D. T., & Woo, J. (2004). Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the medical outcomes study social support survey (MOS-SSS-C). Research in Nursing and Health, 27(2), 135–143.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Nam, S., Chesla, C., Stotts, N. A., Kroon, L., & Janson, S. L. (2011). Barriers to diabetes management: Patient and provider factors. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 93(1), 1–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Tang, T. S., Brown, M. B., Funnell, M. M., & Anderson, R. M. (2008). Social support, quality of life, and self-care behaviors among African Americans with type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator, 34(2), 266–276.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Toljamo, M., & Hentinen, M. (2001). Adherence to self-care and social support. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 10(5), 618–627.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Albright, T. L., Parchman, M., & Burge, S. K. (2001). Predictors of self-care behavior in adults with type 2 diabetes: An RRNeST study. Family Medicine, 33(5), 354–360.PubMed
13.
Garay-Sevilla, M. E., Nava, L. E., Malacara, J. M., Huerta, R., de Leon, J. D., Mena, A., et al. (1995). Adherence to treatment and social support in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, 9(2), 81–86.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Chlebowy, D. O., & Garvin, B. J. (2006). Social support, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations: Impact on self-care behaviors and glycemic control in Caucasian and African American adults with type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator, 32(5), 777–786.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Rodrigues, F. F., Zanetti, M. L., dos, S. M. A., Martins, T. A., Sousa, V. D., & de Sousa Teixeira, C. R. (2009). Knowledge and attitude: Important components in diabetes education. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 17(4), 468–473.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Mazzuca, S. A. (1982). Does patient education in chronic disease have therapeutic value. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 35(7), 521–529.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Harvey, J. N., & Lawson, V. L. (2009). The importance of health belief models in determining self-care behaviour in diabetes. Diabetic Medicine: A Journal of the British Diabetic Association, 26(1), 5–13.CrossRef
18.
Brownlee-Duffeck, M., Peterson, L., Simonds, J. F., Goldstein, D., Kilo, C., & Hoette, S. (1987). The role of health beliefs in the regimen adherence and metabolic control of adolescents and adults with diabetes mellitus. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 139–144.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Gillibrand, R., & Stevenson, J. (2006). The extended health belief model applied to the experience of diabetes in young people. British Journal of Health Psychology, 11(Pt 1), 155–169.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zimet, G. D., Powell, S. S., Farley, G. K., Werkman, S., & Berkoff, K. A. (1990). Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3–4), 610–617.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Guan, N. C., Huai, S. L., Hway, A. A. Y., & Ong, H. K. (2015). Factorial validity and reliability of the malaysian simplified chinese version of multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS-SCV) among a group of university students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27(2), 225–231.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Toobert, D. J., Hampson, S. E., & Glasgow, R. E. (2000). The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: Results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care, 23(7), 943–950.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Wang, R. H., & Lin, C. C. (1998). Self-care behaviors and related factors in outpatients newly diagnosed with non-Insulin dependent. The Journal of Nursing (in Chinese), 4(5), 60–74.
24.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef
25.
Hamta, A., Khalilian, A. R., Farhadi, R., & Ranjbaran, H. (2013). Path analysis of the risk of low birth weight for multipara. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 15(6), 462–466.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Gallant, M. P. (2003). The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: A review and directions for research. Health Education and Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 30(2), 170–195.CrossRef
27.
Rosland, A. M., Kieffer, E., Israel, B., Cofield, M., Palmisano, G., Sinco, B., et al. (2008). When is social support important? The association of family support and professional support with specific diabetes self-management behaviors. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(12), 1992–1999.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Mayberry, L. S., & Osborn, C. Y. (2012). Family support, medication adherence, and glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 35(6), 1239–1245.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Xu, Y., Toobert, D., Savage, C., Pan, W., & Whitmer, K. (2008). Factors influencing diabetes self-management in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes. Research in Nursing and Health, 31(6), 613–625.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Chan, Y. M., & Molassiotis, A. (1999). The relationship between diabetes knowledge and compliance among Chinese with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in Hong Kong. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(2), 431–438.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Self-management behavior among patients with diabetic retinopathy in the community: a structural equation model
Auteurs
Li Yang
Qunhong Wu
Yanhua Hao
Yu Cui
Libo Liang
Lijun Gao
Mingli Jiao
Ning Ning
Hong Sun
Zheng Kang
Liyuan Han
Ye Li
Hui Yin
Publicatiedatum
03-09-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1396-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2017

Predictors of health-related quality of life and association with survival may identify colorectal cancer patients at high risk of poor prognosis

Expectations of younger patients concerning activities after knee arthroplasty: are we asking the right questions?

  • Open Access

Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic rheumatic disease after a multidisciplinary rehabilitation regimen

Validation of World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 in specialized somatic rehabilitation services in Norway

  • Open Access

Measurement equivalence of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Medicare survey items between Whites and Asians

Does one size fit all? Assessing the preferences of older and younger people for attributes of quality of life