Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Patterns of adjustment for youth victimized by peers vary depending on whether youth are identified as victims through self-reports, peer-reports, or both. In order to provide more targeted strategies that may help mitigate negative consequences associated with specific victimization groups, more information is needed about how these youth perceive their school ecology (bullying and academic ecology), their feelings of school belonging, and their valuing of school. Based on the convergence of self- and peer-reports of victimization, we identified four victim groups from a sample of students in 5th grade classrooms (N = 1360; 52.8% girls, 53.1% White, 34.6% Black or Hispanic, 12.2% Native American, Asian, or other) using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA): convergent victims (high self- and peer-reports), self-identified victims (high self-, low peer-reports), peer-identified victims (low self-, high peer-reports), and nonvictims (low self- and peer-reports). Convergent victims’ perceptions were similar to nonvictims with key differences being convergent victims’ greater willingness to protect peers being bullied but lower feelings of school belonging compared to nonvictims. Peer-identified and self-identified victims perceived differences in the bullying and academic ecology including peer-identified victims’ greater willingness to protect peers and expectations for more peers to encourage bulling against them compared to self-identified victims. However, both peer- and self-identified victims perceived greater emotional risk of participating in class and had lower feelings of school belonging compared to nonvictims. Implications for supporting youth with divergent self- and peer-reported victimization status as they transition to middle school are discussed.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Belfield, C., & Levin, H. M. (2007). The price we pay: Economic and social consequences of inadequate education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Cairns, R. B., Leung, M.-C., Gest, S. D., & Cairns, B. D. (1995). A brief method for assessing social development: Structure, reliability, stability, and developmental validity of the interpersonal competence scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 725–736. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00004-H. CrossRefPubMed
Dawes, M., &Xie, H. (2016). The trajectory of popularity goal during the transition to middle school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 1-32. doi: 10.1177/0272431615626301.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Springer. CrossRef
Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In R. Ames, & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (vol. 3, pp. 139–181). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanaga, C., & MacIver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90. CrossRefPubMed
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) and N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wiley.
Hagborg, W. J. (1998). An investigation of a brief measure of school membership. Adolescence, 33(130), 461–468. PubMed
Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., Dadisman, K., Gravelle, M., & Murray, A. R. (2011). Teachers’ attunement to students’ peer group affiliations as a source of improved student experiences of the school social-affective context following the middle school transition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 267–277. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2010.06.003. CrossRef
Juvonen, J., & Galván, A. (2008). Peer influence in involuntary social groups: Lessons from research on bullying. In M. Prinstein, & K. Dodge (Eds.), Peer influence processes among youth (pp. 225–244). New York: Guilford Press.
Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2001). Self-views versus peer perceptions of victim status among early adolescents. In J. Juvonen, & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 196–214). New York: Guilford.
Juvonen, J., & Wentzel, K. R. (1996). Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Ladd, G., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2002). Identifying victims of peer aggression from early to middle childhood: Analysis of cross-informant data for concordance, estimation of relational adjustment, prevalence of victimization, and characteristics of identified victims. Psychological Assessment, 14, 74–96. doi: 10.1037/1040-35188.8.131.52. CrossRefPubMed
Leff, S. S., Power, T. J., Costigan, T. E., & Manz, P. H. (2003). Assessing the climate of the playground and lunchroom: Implications for bullying prevention programming. School Psychology Review, 32, 418–430.
Lo, Y., Mendell, N., & Rubin, D. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778. CrossRef
McCutcheon, A. C. (1987). Latent class analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. CrossRef
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s Guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among us youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.16.2094. CrossRefPubMed
Norwalk, K. E., Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., & Barnes, K. L. (2015). Improving the school context of early adolescence through teacher attunement to victimization: Effects on school belonging. Journal of Early Adolescence. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/027243165590230
Olweus, D. (1986). The Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: Research Centre for Health Promotion (HEMIL Center), University of Bergen. Mimeo.
Olweus, D. (1996). The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: Research Centre for Health Promotion (HEMIL Center), University of Bergen. Mimeo.
Perry, D. G., Hodges, E. V. E., & Egan, S. K. (2001). Determinants of chronic victimization by peers: A review and new model of family influence. In J. Juvonen, S. Graham (Eds.). Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 73–103). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Polanin, J., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior and empathy attitude. School Psychology Review, 41, 47–65. doi: 10.1177/0741932514564564.
Prinstein, M. J., Rancourt, D., Guerry, J. D., & Browne, C. B. (2009). Peer reputations and psychological adjustment. In K. H. Rubin, M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 548–567). New York: Guilford Press.
Rodkin, P. C., & Gest, S. D. (2011). Teaching practices, classroom peer ecologies, and bullying behaviors among schoolchildren. In D. L. Espelage, & S. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in North American Schools (2nd ed., pp. 75–90). New York: Routledge.
Rodkin, P. C., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2003). Bullies and victims in the peer ecology: Four questions for psychologists and school professionals. School Psychology Review, 32, 384–400.
Rodkin, P. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). Child and adolescent peer relations in educational context. In S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Assoc. Eds.). APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 363–389). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Editor-in-Chief: K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan doi:10.1037/13274-015.
Schwartz, D., Lansford, J. E., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (2015). Peer victimization during middle childhood as a lead indicator of internalizing problems and diagnostic outcomes in late. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44, 393–404. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.881293. CrossRef
Song, S. Y. (2005). Protective peer ecology scale- Middle school. Unpublished Measure, New Haven, CT: Yale Child Study Center.
Wentzel, K. R. (2009). Peer relationships and motivation at school. In K. Rubin, W. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook on peer relationships (pp. 531–547). New York, NY: Guilford.
- Self- and Peer-Identified Victims in Late Childhood: Differences in Perceptions of the School Ecology
Thomas W. Farmer
Jill V. Hamm
- Springer US