Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The purpose of this study was to explore individual- and school-level policy characteristics on student smoking behavior using an ecological perspective. Participants were 24,213 (51% female) Grade 10–11 students from 81 schools in five Canadian provinces. Data were collected using student self-report surveys, written policies collected from schools, interviews with school administrators, and school property observations to assess multiple dimensions of the school tobacco policy. The multi-level modeling results revealed that the school a student attended was associated with his/her smoking behavior. Individual-level variables that were associated with student smoking included lower school connectedness, a greater number of family and friends who smoked, higher perceptions of student smoking prevalence, lower perceptions of student smoking frequency, and stronger perceptions of the school tobacco context. School-level variables associated with student smoking included weaker policy intention indicating prohibition and assistance to overcome tobacco addiction, weaker policy implementation involving strategies for enforcement, and a higher number of students smoking on school property. These findings suggest that the school environment is important to tobacco control strategies, and that various policy dimensions have unique relationships to student smoking. School tobacco policies should be part of a comprehensive approach to adolescent tobacco use.
American Lung Association. (2003). Adolescent smoking statistics. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.lungusa.org/site/c.dvLUK9O0E/b.39868/k.AFBF/Adolescent_Smoking_Statistics.htm.
Ashley, M. J., Northrup, D. A., & Ferrence, R. (1998). The Ontario ban on smoking on school property: Issues and challenges in enforcement. Canaidan Journal of Public Health, 89, 229–232.
Aveyard, P., Markham, W. A., & Cheng, K. K. (2004). A methodological and substantive review of the evidence that schools cause pupils to smoke. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 2253–2265. CrossRef
Bandura, A. (1997). The anatomy of stages of change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12, 8–10. PubMed
Barnett, T. A., Gauvin, L., Lambert, M., O’Loughlin, J., Paradis, G., & McGrath, J. J. (2007). The influence of school smoking policies on student tobacco use. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161, 842–848. CrossRef
Bogden, J. F., & Vega-Matos, C. A. (2000). Fit healthy and ready to learn (part 1). Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Boards of Education.
Bond, L., Butler, H., Thomas, L., Carlin, J., Glover, S., Bowes, G., et al. (2007). Social and school connectedness in early secondary school as predictors of late teenage substance use, mental health, and academic outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 357.e9–357.e18. CrossRef
Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2000). School health index for physical activity and healthy eating: A self-assessment and planning guide—tobacco modifications supplement. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
Darling, H., & Reeder, A. (2003). Smoke-free schools? Results of a secondary school smoking policies survey 2002. New Zealand Medical Journal, 116, U560. PubMed
Denman, S., Hopkins, D., Wallbanks, C., & Skuriat, V. (2008). The management and organisation of health promotion: A survey of school policies in Nottinghamshire. Health Education Journal, 58, 165–176. CrossRef
Dornbusch, S. M., Erickson, K. G., Laird, J., & Wong, C. A. (2001). The relation of family and school attachment to adolescent deviance in diverse groups and communitities. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 396–422. CrossRef
Flay, B. R., Petraitis, J., & Hu, F. B. (1999). Psychosocial risk and protective factors for adolescent tobacco use. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 1(Suppl 1), S59–S65. CrossRef
Hamilton, G., Cross, D., Lower, T., Resnicow, K., & Williams, P. (2003). School policy: What helps to reduce teenage smoking? Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 5, 507–513.
Health Canada. (2004). Canadian tobacco use monitoring survey (CTUMS) annual results, 2004. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/tobac-tabac/research-recherche/stat/ctums-esutc_2004-eng.php.
Health Canada. (2008). Summary of results of the 2006–2007 youth smoking survey. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/tobac-tabac/research-recherche/stat/_survey-sondage_2006-2007/result-eng.php.
Hirschi, T. (1998). Social bond theory. In F. T. Cullen & R. Agnew (Eds.), Criminological theory: Past to present. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
Igra, V., & Irwin, C. E. (1996). Theories of adolescent risk-taking behavior. In R. J. DiClemente, W. B. Hansen, & L. Ponton (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent health risk behavior. New York: Spinger.
Kumar, R., O’Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2005). School tobacco control policies related to students’ smoking and attitudes toward smoking: National survey results, 1999–2000. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 780–794. CrossRef
Leatherdale, S. T., & Manske, S. (2005). The relationship between student smoking in the school environment and smoking onset in elementary school students. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 14, 1762–1765. CrossRef
Leatherdale, S. T., McDonald, P. W., Cameron, R., & Brown, K. S. (2005c). A multilevel analysis examining the relationship between social influences for smoking and smoking onset. American Journal of Health Behavior, 29, 520–530. PubMed
Maes, L., & Lievens, J. (2003). Can the school make a difference? A multilevel analysis of adolescent risk and health behavior. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 517–529. CrossRef
McBride, M. (2006). BC school smoking policy: Recommendations for future action. Victoria, BC: Tobacco Control Program, BC Ministry of Health.
Murnaghan, D. A., Leatherdale, S. T., Sihvonen, M., & Kekki, P. (2008). A multilevel analysis examining the association between school-based smoking policies, prevention programs and youth smoking behavior: Evaluating a provincial tobacco control strategy. Health Education Research, 23, 1016–1028. PubMedCrossRef
Northrup, D. A., Ashley, M. J., & Ferrence, R. (1998). The Ontario ban on smoking on school property: Perceived impact on smoking. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 89, 224–228.
Poulin, C. C. (2007). School smoking bans: Do they help/do they harm? Drug & Alcohol Review, 26, 615–624. CrossRef
Reitsma, A. H., & Manske, S. (2004). Smoking in Ontario schools: Does policy make a difference? Canadian Journal of Public Health, 95, 214–218.
Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
Sussman, S. (1989). Two social influence perspectives of tobacco use development and prevention. Health Education Research, 4, 213–223. CrossRef
World Health Organization. (2006). The facts about smoking and health. Retrieved May 15, 2009, from http://www.wpro.who.int/media_centre/fact_sheets/fs_20060530.htm.
- School Smoking Policy Characteristics and Individual Perceptions of the School Tobacco Context: Are They Linked to Students’ Smoking Status?
Catherine M. Sabiston
Chris Y. Lovato
Allison W. Pullman
H. Sharon Campbell
K. Stephen Brown
- Springer US