Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 3/2010

01-05-2010 | Original Article

RT patterns and chunks in SRT tasks: a reply to Jiménez (2008)

Auteurs: Waldemar Kirsch, Albrecht Sebald, Joachim Hoffmann

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2010

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the formation of units or chunks contributes to sequence learning in serial reaction time (SRT) tasks (Koch & Hoffmann, Psychological Research 63:22–35, 2000). However, some of these results were assumed to be unrelated to sequence learning and to reflect preexistent response tendencies (Jiménez, Psychological Research 72:387–396, 2008). In the Experiment of this study, we aimed to evaluate this issue. One group of participants responded to a strongly structured sequence of digits by pressing one out of six response keys depending on digit identity. In a second experimental group, a weakly structured sequence was presented, which contained comparable transitions among the single items, but did not have series of ascending and descending triplets of successive digits. The results indicated that serial learning in general as well as response tendencies to certain fragments of the sequence were modulated by the manipulation of the strength of relational patterns. The data are consistent with the notion that relational patterns contribute to the formation of chunks as suggested in the original study.
Voetnoten
1
This variation resembles the variations of Experiment 1 in the study of Koch and Hoffmann (2000) in which the runs within the triplets were eliminated by using different S-R mappings. However, by changing the S-R mappings, not only different S-R compatibilities were created but also the positions of hand switches and reversals were changed so that RT patterns over the triple positions were no longer comparable to each other.
 
2
The last test block was not included in this analysis.
 
3
We would like to thank Bernhard Hommel suggesting this kind of analysis.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 406–416.CrossRef Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 406–416.CrossRef
go back to reference Collard, R., & Povel, D. (1982). Theory of serial pattern production: Tree traversals. Psychological Review, 89, 693–707.CrossRef Collard, R., & Povel, D. (1982). Theory of serial pattern production: Tree traversals. Psychological Review, 89, 693–707.CrossRef
go back to reference Ericsson, K. A., & Chase, W. G. (1982). Exceptional memory. American Scientist, 70, 607–615.PubMed Ericsson, K. A., & Chase, W. G. (1982). Exceptional memory. American Scientist, 70, 607–615.PubMed
go back to reference Frensch, P. A., Buchner, A., & Lin, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of distractor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 567–584.CrossRef Frensch, P. A., Buchner, A., & Lin, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of distractor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 567–584.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoffmann, J., & Sebald, A. (1996). Reiz- und Reaktionsmuster in seriellen Wahlreaktionen [Stimulus and response patterns in serial choice reactions]. Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie, 43, 40–68.PubMed Hoffmann, J., & Sebald, A. (1996). Reiz- und Reaktionsmuster in seriellen Wahlreaktionen [Stimulus and response patterns in serial choice reactions]. Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie, 43, 40–68.PubMed
go back to reference Jiménez, L. (2008). Taking patterns for chunks: Is there any evidence of chunk learning in continuous serial reaction-time tasks? Psychological Research, 72, 387–396.CrossRefPubMed Jiménez, L. (2008). Taking patterns for chunks: Is there any evidence of chunk learning in continuous serial reaction-time tasks? Psychological Research, 72, 387–396.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000). Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks. Psychological Research, 63, 22–35.CrossRefPubMed Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000). Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks. Psychological Research, 63, 22–35.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.CrossRefPubMed Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.CrossRef Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Povel, D. J., & Collard, R. (1982). Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. Acta Psychologica, 52, 107–124.CrossRefPubMed Povel, D. J., & Collard, R. (1982). Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. Acta Psychologica, 52, 107–124.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Restle, F. (1970). Theory of serial pattern learning: Structural trees. Psychological Review, 77, 481–495.CrossRef Restle, F. (1970). Theory of serial pattern learning: Structural trees. Psychological Review, 77, 481–495.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S. B., & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86–102.CrossRefPubMed Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S. B., & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86–102.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Servan-Schreiber, E., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 592–608.CrossRef Servan-Schreiber, E., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 592–608.CrossRef
go back to reference Stadler, M. A. (1993). Implicit learning: Questions inspired by Hebb (1961). Memory and Cognition, 21, 819–827. Stadler, M. A. (1993). Implicit learning: Questions inspired by Hebb (1961). Memory and Cognition, 21, 819–827.
go back to reference Stadler, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 674–685.CrossRef Stadler, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 674–685.CrossRef
go back to reference Zießler, M. (1993). Die Struktur von Bewegungssequenzen: Interaktionen zwischen Wahrnehmung and motorischer Steuerung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 201, 109–129.PubMed Zießler, M. (1993). Die Struktur von Bewegungssequenzen: Interaktionen zwischen Wahrnehmung and motorischer Steuerung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 201, 109–129.PubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
RT patterns and chunks in SRT tasks: a reply to Jiménez (2008)
Auteurs
Waldemar Kirsch
Albrecht Sebald
Joachim Hoffmann
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2010
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0248-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2010

Psychological Research 3/2010 Naar de uitgave