Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-01-2005 | Original Article

Right-left prevalence with task-irrelevant spatial codes

Auteurs: Sandro Rubichi, Roberto Nicoletti, Carlo Umiltà

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2005

Abstract

The present work investigated the right-left prevalence effect caused by the automatic activation of horizontal and vertical spatial codes in a task (Simon task) in which spatial information is task-irrelevant. Experiment 1 showed a horizontal Simon effect and a vertical Simon effect with a two-dimensional stimulus-response set. In Experiments 2 and 3, the right-left prevalence was obtained in two-dimensional Simon tasks with two contralateral effectors and four effectors respectively. Experiment 4 showed that horizontal coding is based on multiple spatial codes, whereas only one spatial code was formed for vertical coding. On the whole, these results support the notion that the right-left prevalence effect is a general phenomenon affecting spatial coding, and suggest that the horizontal dimension is prevalent because it is based on multiple spatial codes.

vorige artikel Selection and consolidation of objects and actions

volgende artikel Mechanisms underlying spatial coding in a multiple-item Simon task

Hereafter, we will also use the terms compatible and incompatible trials for the Simon task.

When the present paper was about to be submitted, the paper by Proctor et al. (2003) came to our attention as soon as it was submitted. In it the authors investigated right-left prevalence by the use of the two-dimensional Simon task. Simon effects were evident for both the horizontal and vertical dimensions, and they were of similar magnitude. When salience of one dimension was manipulated, the Simon effect was greater for the more salient dimension. These results of course were in accordance with the relative salience explanation of the right-left prevalence effect and allow this explanation to be extended to conditions in which the spatial codes are formed automatically.

Part of the data of the present work were collected when Sandro Rubichi was at the University of Urbino.

If we consider that using contralateral hand and foot responses is a way of enhancing the environmental salience of the horizontal dimension, a test of the right-left prevalence in Simon tasks would be provided by an experiment along the lines of Vu and Proctor’s (2001) Experiment 2 with stimulus location as the irrelevant stimulus dimension. This test has been conducted by Proctor et al. (2003). More precisely, the authors evaluated HE and VE with contralateral and ipsilateral hand-foot responses when the display salience was biased towards the horizontal or the vertical dimensions. Results showed that when both the display and the response salience favored one spatial dimension, the Simon effect was larger for that dimension. However, when the display and response salience did not match, the overall Simon effect favored the horizontal dimension. This asymmetry reflects the fact that display and response salience only influenced the Simon effect for the vertical dimension, whereas the horizontal Simon effect was not. Of course, this pattern of result can be interpreted as indicating right-left prevalence effect that is partially independent of environmental salience.

De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.PubMed

Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210.PubMed

Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427–439.PubMed

Heuer H. (1990). Rapid responses with the left or right hand: Response-response compatibility effects due to intermanual interactions. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus–response compatibility. An integrated perspective (pp. 311–342). Amsterdam: North-Holland

Heuer, H. (1993). Structural constraints on bimanual movements. Psychological Research, 55, 83–98.PubMed

Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261–268.PubMed

Hommel, B. (1996). No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 102–110.PubMed

Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (Eds.), (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.PubMed

Lamberts, K., Tavernier, G., & d’Ydewalle, G. (1992). Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 79, 115–130.CrossRefPubMed

Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207.

Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1984). Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 333–343.

Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1985). Responding with hand and foot: The right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 211–216.

Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, C., Tressoldi, E. P., & Marzi, C. A. (1988). Why are left-right spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones? Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 287–292.

Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (1985). Compatibility effects in the assignments of symbolic stimuli to discrete finger response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 623–639.CrossRef

Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (Eds.), (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Proctor, R. W., Vu, K. P., & Nicoletti, R. (2003). The Simon effect for two-dimensional spatial stimulus-response sets. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1318–1329.

Roswarski, T. E., & Proctor, R. W. (1996). Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks. Psychological Research, 59, 196–211.

Rubichi, S., Pelosi, A., Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (in press). Right-left prevalence effect with horizontal and vertical effectors. Perception & Psychophysics

Simon, J. R, & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.PubMed

Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 648–670.CrossRefPubMed

Umiltà, C., & Liotti, M. (1987). Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility. Psychological Research, 49, 81–90.

Vu, K. P., & Proctor, R. W. (2001). Determinants of the right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 813–828.CrossRefPubMed

Vu, K. P., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 815–828.

Vu, K. P., Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (2000). Vertical versus horizontal spatial compatibility: right-left prevalence with bimanual responses. Psychological Research, 64, 25–40.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Right-left prevalence with task-irrelevant spatial codes
Auteurs: Sandro Rubichi
Roberto Nicoletti
Carlo Umiltà
Publicatiedatum: 01-01-2005
Uitgeverij: Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2005
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0168-z

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2005

Hierarchical number estimation

Foreground–background segmentation and attention: A change blindness study

The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control?

Mechanisms underlying spatial coding in a multiple-item Simon task

Selection and consolidation of objects and actions

Categorical and metric distance information in mental representations derived from route and survey descriptions