Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0747-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. This supplementary file contains References 51–202.
Little is known about local access-site complications and upper extremity dysfunction after transradial percutaneous coronary procedures (TR-PCP). This systematic review study aimed to summarise the current knowledge on the incidences of access-site complications and upper extremity dysfunction after TR-PCP.
Two independent, trained investigators searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL for eligible studies published before 1 January 2015. Also, they hand-searched the conference proceedings of the annual scientific sessions of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, European Society of Cardiology, and the Trans-catheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics. Inclusion criteria were cohort studies and clinical trials discussing the incidence of access-site complications and upper extremity function after transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (TR-PCI) and/or transradial coronary angiography (TR-CAG) as endpoints.
176 articles described access-site complications. The incidence is up to 9.6 %. Fourteen articles described upper extremity dysfunction, with an incidence of up to 1.7 %. Upper extremity dysfunction was rarely investigated, hardly ever as primary endpoint, and if investigated not thoroughly enough.
Upper extremity dysfunction in TR-PCP has never been properly investigated and is therefore underestimated. Further studies are needed to investigate the magnitude, prevention and best treatment of upper extremity dysfunction. Optimising TR-PCP might be achieved by using slender techniques, detection of upper extremity dysfunction and early referral to a hand rehabilitation centre.
A table with the remaining references, with in the first column the reference number corresponding with the references in the text. (PDF 167 KB)12471_2015_747_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Bataineh ZM, Habbal O, Moqattash ST. Variations in the superficial palmar arch of the hand. Ital J Anat Embryol. 2009;114:11–20. PubMed
World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: WHO; 1980.
Johnson D, Ellis H. Pectoral girdle and upper limb. In: Standring S, editor. Gray’s Anatomy. New York: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. S 799–942.
Bazemore E, Mann JT 3rd. Problems and complications of the transradial approach for coronary interventions: a review. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005;17:156–9. (Review) PubMed
Ihaka R, Gentleman R. GNU R. Free Software Foundation (FSF) Free Software Directory. 2010.
Wu SS, Galani RJ, Bahro A, et al. 8 french transradial coronary interventions: clinical outcome and late effects on the radial artery and hand function. J Invasive Cardiol. 2000;12:605–9. PubMed
Prull MW, Brandts B, Rust H, et al. Vascular complications of percutaneous transradial coronary angiography and coronary intervention. Med Klin (Munich). 2005;100:377–82. CrossRef
Ahmed WH. Transradial coronary angiography and intervention. Saudi Med J. 2003;24:850–3. PubMed
Eichhöfer J, Horlick E, Ivanov J, et al. Decreased complication rates using the transradial compared to the transfemoral approach in percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of routine stenting and glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor use: a large single-center experience. Am Heart J. 2008;156:864–70. CrossRefPubMed
Guédès A, Dangoisse V, Gabriel L, et al. Low rate of conversion to transfemoral approach when attempting both radial arteries for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a study of 1,826 consecutive procedures. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010;22:391–7 PubMed
Hsueh SK, Hsieh YK, Wu CJ, et al. Immediate results of percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses: transradial versus transfemoral approach. Chang Gung Med J. 2008;31:190–200. PubMed
Huang CH, Chen CY, Chen IC, et al. Impact of the transradial approach to coronary angiography or angioplasty on radial artery in Taiwanese population. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2004;20:212–8.
Kim MH, Cha KS, Kim HJ, et al. Primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction via the transradial approach: a safe and useful alternative to the transfemoral approach. J Invasive Cardiol. 2000;12:292–6. PubMed
Von Korn H, Ohlow MA, Yu J, et al. A new vascular closure device for the transradial approach: the D Stat Radial system. J Interv Cardiol. 2008;21:337–41. CrossRef
- Revealing the impact of local access-site complications and upper extremity dysfunction post transradial percutaneous coronary procedures
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum