Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-10-2014

Results from several population studies show that recommended scoring methods of the SF-36 and the SF-12 may lead to incorrect conclusions and subsequent health decisions

Auteurs: Graeme Tucker, Robert Adams, David Wilson

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 8/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the measurement properties of the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores of the SF-36 and SF-12 based on the traditional orthogonal scoring algorithms with the performance of the PCS and MCS scored based on structural equation model coefficients from a correlated model.

Methods

This study used three large-scale representative population studies to compare the measurement properties of the PCS and MCS scores of the SF-36 and SF-12 with the performance of the PCS and MCS scores based on structural equation models producing coefficients from a correlated model. We assessed the relationships of these scores with selected important mental health measures and chronic conditions from three representative Australian population studies that address clinical conditions of high prevalence and health service importance.

Results

Structural equation model scoring methods produced summary scores with higher correlations than the recommended orthogonal methods across a range of disease and health conditions. The problem experienced in using the orthogonal methods is that negative scoring coefficients are applied to negative z-scores for sub-scales, inflating the resulting summary scores. Effect sizes over a half of a standard deviation were common.

Conclusions

If health policy or investment decisions are made based on the results of studies employing the recommended orthogonal scoring methods then the expected outcome of such decisions or investments may not be achieved.
vorige artikel Danish population-based reference data for the EORTC QLQ-C30: associations with gender, age and morbidity
volgende artikel Factorial structural analysis of the Spanish version of WHOQOL-BREF: an exploratory structural equation model study
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Hawthorne, G., Osborne, R. H., Taylor, A., & Sansoni, J. (2007). The SF-36 Version 2: Critical analysis of population weighting, scoring algorithms and population norms. Quality of Life Research, 16, 661–673.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). The SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre.
3.
Sorensen, L., Stokes, J. A., Purdie, D. M., et al. (2004). Medication reviews in the community: Results of a randomized, controlled effectiveness trial. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 58, 648–664.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. (1999). The Australian coordinated care trials: Background and trial descriptions. Canberra: Department of Health and Aged Care.
5.
McCallum, J. (1995). The new SF-36 health status measure: Australian validity tests. Canberra: National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health. Paper presented to the Health Outcomes and Quality of Life Measurement Conference.
6.
McCallum, J. (1995). The SF-36 in an Australian sample: Validating a new, generic health status measure. Australian Journal of Public Health, 19, 160–166.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Sanson-Fisher, R. W., & Perkins, J. J. (1998). Adaptation and validation of the SF-36 health survey for use in Australia. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 961–967.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A users manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre.
9.
Hays, R. D., Sherbourne, C. D., & Mazel, R. M. (1993). The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Economics, 2, 217–227.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Hays, R. D., Prince-Embury, S., & Chen, H. (1998). RAND-36 health status inventory. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
11.
Hays, R. D., & Morales, L. S. (2001). The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Annals of Medicine, 33, 350–357.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Simon, G. E., Revicki, D. A., Grothaus, L., & Vonkorf, M. (1998). SF-36 summary scores: Are physical and mental health truly distinct? Medical Care, 36, 567–572.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Wilson, D., Parsons, J., & Tucker, G. (2000). The SF-36 summary scales: Problems and solutions. Sozial-und Präventivmedizin, 45, 239–246.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Taft, C., Karlson, J., & Sullivan, M. (2001). Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarise subscale scores? Quality of Life Research, 10, 395–404.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Farivar, S. S., Cunningham, W. E., & Hays, R. D. (2007). Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 health survey, V. 1. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 54.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
Hann, M., & Reeves, D. (2008). The SF-36 scales are not accurately summarised by independent physical and mental component scores. Quality of Life Research, 17, 413–423.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Anagnostopoulos, F., Niakas, D., & Tountas, Y. (2009). Comparison between exploratory factor-analytic and SEM-based approaches to constructing SF-36 summary scores. Quality of Life Research, 18, 53–63.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Fleishman, J. A., Selim, A. J., & Kazis, L. E. (2010). Deriving SF-12v2 physical and mental health summary scores: A comparison of different scoring algorithms. Quality of Life Research, 19(2), 231–241.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Tucker, G., Adams, R., & Wilson, D. (2010). New Australian population scoring coefficients for the old version of the SF-36 and SF-12 health status questionnaires. Quality of Life Research, 19(7), 1069–1076.PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
22.
23.
Cheok, F., Schrader, G., Banham, D., Marker, J., & Hordacre, A. L. (2003). Identification, course, and treatment of depression after admission for a cardiac condition: Rationale and patient characteristics for the Identifying Depression As a Comorbid Condition (IDACC) project. American Heart Journal, 146(6), 978–984.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Schrader, G., Cheok, F., Hordacre, A. L., & Guiver, N. (2004). Predictors of depression three months after cardiac hospitalization. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(4), 514–520.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Wilson, D. H., Appleton, S. L., Taylor, A. W., Tucker, G., Ruffin, R. E., Wittert, G., et al. (2010). Depression and obesity in adults with asthma: Multiple comorbidities and management issues. Medical Journal of Australia, 192(7), 381–383.PubMed
26.
Sullivan, M. D., O’Connor, P., Feeney, P., Hire, D., Simmons, D. L., Raisch, D. W., et al. (2012). Depression predicts all-cause mortality: Epidemiological evaluation from the ACCORD HRQL substudy. Diabetes Care, 35(8), 1708–1715. doi:10.​2337/​dc11-1791.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
27.
Lin, E. H., Von Korff, M., Ciechanowski, P., Peterson, D., Ludman, E. J., Rutter, C. M., et al. (2012). Treatment adjustment and medication adherence for complex patients with diabetes, heart disease, and depression: A randomized controlled trial. The Annals of Family Medicine, 10(1), 6–14. doi:10.​1370/​afm.​1343.CrossRef
28.
Katon, W. J. (2011). Epidemiology and treatment of depression in patients with chronic medical illness. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscienc, 13(1), 7–23.
29.
Davydow, D. S., Katon, W. J., & Zatzick, D. F. (2009). Psychiatric morbidity and functional impairments in survivors of burns, traumatic injuries, and ICU stays for other critical illnesses: A review of the literature. International Review of Psychiatry, 21(6), 531–538. doi:10.​3109/​0954026090334387​7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
31.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1995). National Health Survey. SF-36 Population Norms Australia. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Catalogue Number 4399.0.
32.
Ware, J., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. (1995). SF-12: How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales (2nd ed.). Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
33.
Ware J. E. Jr., Kosinski M., Turner-Bowker, D., Sundaram M., Gandeck, B., & Maruish M. E. (2002). User’s manual for the SF-12 V2 health survey, Second Edition. Quality Metric, 24 Albion Rd, Building 400, Lincoln, RI 02865, USA.
34.
35.
36.
Hawthorne, G. & Richardson, J. (1997). The assessment of quality of life (AQoL) instrument construction, initial validation and utility scaling. Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Melbourne (15 pages) (ISBN 1 875677 85 2).
37.
Hawthorne, G., Korn, S., & Richardson, J. (2013). Population norms for the AQoL derived from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 37(1), 7–16.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Selim, A., Ren, X., Fincke, G., Rogers, W., Lee, A., & Kazis, L. (1997). A symptom-based measure of the severity of chronic lung disease: results from the Veterans Health Study. Chest, 111, 1607–1614.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Ruffin, R. E., Wilson, D. H., Chittleborough, C. R., Southcott, A. M., Smith, B., & Christopher, D. J. (2000). Multiple respiratory symptoms predict quality of life in chronic lung disease: A population-based study of Australian adults. Quality of Life Research, 9, 1031–1039.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Goldberg, D. P., & Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9, 139–145.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRef
42.
Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hripi, E., Mrocsek, D. K., Normand, S.-L. T., et al. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in nonspecific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959–976.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Wilson, D., Wakefield, M., & Taylor, A. (1992). The South Australian health omnibus survey. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 2, 47–49.
44.
Grant, J. F., Taylor, A. W., Ruffin, R. E., Wilson, D. H., Phillips, P. J., Adams, R. J. T., et al. (2009). Cohort profile: The North West Adelaide Health Study (NWAHS). International Journal of Epidemiology, 38, 1479–1486. doi:10.​1093/​ije/​dyn262.PubMedCrossRef
45.
WANTS Health West. (2001). Collaborative health and wellbeing survey design and methodology. Perth, WA: Western Australian Government.
46.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
47.
Kolappe, K., Henderson, D. C., & Kishare, S. P. (2013). No physical health without mental health: Lessons unlearned? Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91, 3.CrossRef
48.
49.
Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. (2009). No health without mental health: The alert summary report. London: Millbank Medical Ltd.
50.
51.
Adams, R. J., Wilson, D. H., Taylor, A. W., Daly, A., Tursan d’Espaignet, E., Dal Grande, E., et al. (2004). Psychological factors and asthma quality of life: A population based study. Thorax, 59, 930–935.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
52.
Jain, A., & Lolak, S. (2009). Psychiatric aspects of chronic lung disease. Current Psychiatry Reports, 11, 219–225.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Results from several population studies show that recommended scoring methods of the SF-36 and the SF-12 may lead to incorrect conclusions and subsequent health decisions
Auteurs
Graeme Tucker
Robert Adams
David Wilson
Publicatiedatum
01-10-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0669-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2014

Quality of Life Research 8/2014 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

The prediction of quality of life by physical, psychological and social components of frailty in community-dwelling older people

OriginalPaper

Patient’s response to a simple question on recovery after hemodialysis session strongly associated with scores of comprehensive tools for quality of life and depression symptoms

OriginalPaper

Assessing quality of life in young adult cancer survivors: development of the Survivorship-Related Quality of Life scale

OriginalPaper

Impact of vertigo and dizziness on self-perceived participation and autonomy in older adults: results from the KORA-Age study

OriginalPaper

The impact of new screen-detected and previously known type 2 diabetes on health-related quality of life: a population-based study in Qingdao, China

OriginalPaper

Factorial structural analysis of the Spanish version of WHOQOL-BREF: an exploratory structural equation model study