Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Judging offside in football represents a typical go–nogo task (offside—raising the flag, no offside—no response). Nevertheless, several studies involved two-choice tasks (e.g. offside—press key A, no offside—press key B) to investigate potential sources of errors in offside situations. While go–nogo and choice–response tasks are commonly used in experimental psychology, response preferences may differ between the two tasks. Therefore, we investigated the impact of response requirements on offside judgments in a sample of male participants without experience in professional refereeing. Each participant judged displays of potential offside situations in a go–nogo condition and in a two-choice condition. The results show that response requirements affected the response bias of the participants and suggest that go–nogo requirements increase the preference for the positive response (i.e. the offside response) as compared to the two-choice task. We discuss both methodological and theoretical implications of this finding.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Catteeuw, P., Gilis, B., Wagemans, J., & Helsen, W. (2010b). Perceptual-cognitive skills in offside decision making: Expertise and training effects. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32(6), 828–844. CrossRef
Catteeuw, P., Helsen, W., Gilis, B., Van Roie, E., & Wagemans, J. (2009). Visual scan patterns and decision-making skills of expert assistant referees in offside situations. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31, 786–797. CrossRef
Gilis, B., Helsen, W., Catteeuw, P., Roie, E. V., & Wagemans, J. (2009). Interpretation and application of the offside law by expert assistant referees: Perception of spatial positions in complex dynamic events on and off the field. Journal of Sport Sciences, 6, 551–563. doi: 10.1080/02640410802702178. CrossRef
Gilis, B., Helsen, W., Catteeuw, P., & Wagemans, J. (2008). Offside decisions by expert assistant referees in association football: Perception and recall of spatial positions in complex dynamic events. Journal of experimental psychology Applied, 14, 21–35. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.1.2121. CrossRefPubMed
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
IFAB. (2017). Laws of the game 2017/2018. Zurich, Switzerland: The International Football Association Board. Rules and booklet can be retrieved from: http://static-3eb8.kxcdn.com/documents/274/092646_180517_LotG_17_18_FINAL_EN.pdf.
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863. (article 863).
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mallo, J., Frutos, P. G., Juárez, D., & Navarro, E. (2012). Effect of positioning on the accuracy of decision making of association football top-class referees and assistant referees during competitive matches. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(13), 1437–1445. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.711485. CrossRefPubMed
Oudejans, R. R. D., Bakker, F. C., Verheijen, R., Gerrits, J. C., Steinbruckner, M., & Beek, P. J. (2005). How position and motion of expert assistant referees in soccer relate to the quality of their offside judgements during actual match play. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 36(1), 3–21.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E- Prime user‘s guide. University of Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
Wühr, P., Fasold, F., & Memmert, D. (2015). Soccer offside judgments in laypersons with different types of static displays. PLoS One, 10(8), 1–30. CrossRef
- Response requirements affect offside judgments in football (soccer)
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg