Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Internet interventions often rely on convenience sampling, yet convenience samples may differ in important ways from systematic recruitment approaches. The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential demographic, medical, and psychosocial differences between Internet-recruited and registry-recruited cancer survivors in an Internet-based intervention. Participants were recruited from a cancer registry (n = 80) and via broad Internet outreach efforts (n = 160). Participants completed a set of self-report questionnaires, and both samples were compared to a population-based sample of cancer survivors (n = 5,150). The Internet sample was younger, better educated, more likely to be female, had longer time since diagnosis, and had more advanced stage of disease (p’s < .001), and the registry-sample was over-represented by men and those with prostate or other cancer types (p’s < .001). The Internet sample also exhibited lower quality of life and social support and greater mood disturbance (p’s < .001). Understanding how convenience and systematic samples differ has important implications for external validity and potential for dissemination of Internet-based interventions.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Brady, M. J., Cella, D. F., Mo, F., Bonomi, A. E., Tulsky, D. S., Lloyd, S. R., et al. (1997). Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15, 974–986. PubMed
Cadmus Bertram, L. A., Chung, G., Yu, H., Salovey, P., & Irwin, M. (2011). Feasibility of institutional registry-based recruitment for enrolling newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in an exercise trial. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 8, 955–963. PubMed
Cella, D. (1997). FACIT manual. Chicago, IL: Center on Outcomes, Research, and Education, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare and Northwestern University.
David, N., Schlenker, P., Prudlo, U., & Larbig, W. (2011). Online counseling via e-mail for breast cancer patients on the German internet: Preliminary results of a psychoeducational intervention. Psychosocial Medicine, 8, 1–13.
Devinini, T., & Blanchard, E. B. (2005). A randomized controlled trial of an internet-based treatment for chronic headache. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 277–292. CrossRef
Gessler, S., Low, J., Daniells, E., Willams, R., Brough, V., Tookman, A., et al. (2008). Screening for distress in cancer patients: Is the distress thermometer a valid measure in the UK and does it measure change over time? A prospective validation study. Psycho-Oncology, 17, 538–547. PubMedCrossRef
Gorlick, A., Lewallen, A., Regts, G., & Owen, J. E. (2011). A systematic review of behavioral engagement in Internet-based interventions for lung cancer. In 8th Annual conference on abstracts from the American Psychosocial Oncology Society, Anaheim, CA, USA, 17–19 Feb 2011. Charlottesville, VA: APOS.
Hill, W. G., & Weinert, C. (2004). An evaluation of an online intervention to provide social support and health education. Computers Informatics Nursing, 22, 282–288. CrossRef
Hoybe, M. T., Dalton, S. O., Deltour, I., Bidstrup, P. E., Frederiksen, K., & Johansen, C. (2010). Effect of Internet peer-support groups on psychosocial adjustment to cancer: A randomised study. British Journal of Cancer, 102, 1348–1354. CrossRef
Lepore, S. J. (2001). A social-cognitive processing model of emotional adjustment to cancer. In A. Baum & B. Andersen (Eds.), Psychosocial interventions for cancer (pp. 99–118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossRef
Lepore, S. J., & Ituarte, P. H. G. (1999). Optimism about cancer enhances mood by reducing negative social interactions. Cancer Research, Therapy and Control, 8, 165–174.
Lintvedt, O. K., Griffiths, K. M., Sorenson, K., Ostvik, A. R., Wang, C. E., Eisemann, M., et al. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness and efficacy of unguided internet-based self-help intervention for the prevention of depression: A randomized clinical trial. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy. doi: 10.1002/cpp.770 (Epub ahead of print July 6, 2012)
Llach, X. B., Herdman, M., & Schiaffino, A. (1999). Determining correspondence between scores on the EQ-5D “thermometer” and a 5-point categorical rating scale. Medical Care, 37, 671–677. CrossRef
McTavish, F. M., Gustafson, D. H., Owens, B. H., Hawkins, R., Pingree, S., Wise, M., et al. (1995). CHESS (comprehensive health enhancement support system): An interactive computer system for women with breast cancer piloted with an underserved population. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 18, 35–41. PubMedCrossRef
Owen, J. E., Boxley, L., Goldstein, M. S., Lee, J. H., Breen, N., & Rowland, J. H. (2010). Use of health-related online support groups: Population data from the California Health Interview Survey Complementary and Alternative Medicine Study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 427–446. CrossRef
Radloff, L. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 385–401. CrossRef
Roth, A. J., Kornblith, A. B., Batel-Copel, L., Peabody, E., Scher, H. I., & Holland, J. C. (1998). Rapid screening for psychological distress in men with prostate carcinoma: A pilot study. Cancer, 82, 1907–1908. CrossRef
Rowland, J. H., Mariotto, A., Alfano, C. M., Pollack, L. A., Weir, H., K., & White, A. (2012). Cancer survivors: United States, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report ( MMWR). www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6009a1.htm. Accessed 6 July, 2012.
Weiss, D., & Marmar, C. (1997). The impact of event scale—revised. In J. Wilson & T. Keane (Eds.), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD. New York: Guildford.
Zickuhr, K., & Madden, M. (2012). Older adults and internet use. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Older-adults-and-internet-use.aspx. Accessed July 6, 2012.
- Representativeness of two sampling procedures for an internet intervention targeting cancer-related distress: a comparison of convenience and registry samples
Jason E. Owen
Erin O’Carroll Bantum
Annette L. Stanton
- Springer US