Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

20-09-2016 | Review | Uitgave 12/2016 Open Access

Quality of Life Research 12/2016

Reporting and dealing with missing quality of life data in RCTs: has the picture changed in the last decade?

Tijdschrift:
Quality of Life Research > Uitgave 12/2016
Auteurs:
S. Fielding, A. Ogbuagu, S. Sivasubramaniam, G. MacLennan, C. R. Ramsay
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s11136-016-1411-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Purpose

Missing data are a major problem in the analysis of data from randomised trials affecting power and potentially producing biased treatment effects. Specifically focussing on quality of life outcomes, we aimed to report the amount of missing data, whether imputation was used and what methods and was the missing mechanism discussed from four leading medical journals and compare the picture to our previous review nearly a decade ago.

Methods

A random selection (50 %) of all RCTS published during 2013–2014 in BMJ, JAMA, Lancet and NEJM was obtained. RCTs reported in research letters, cluster RCTs, non-randomised designs, review articles and meta-analysis were excluded.

Results

We included 87 RCTs in the review of which 35 % the amount of missing primary QoL data was unclear, 31 (36 %) used imputation. Only 23 % discussed the missing data mechanism. Nearly half used complete case analysis. Reporting was more unclear for secondary QoL outcomes. Compared to the previous review, multiple imputation was used more prominently but mainly in sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions

Inadequate reporting and handling of missing QoL data in RCTs are still an issue. There is a large gap between statistical methods research relating to missing data and the use of the methods in applications. A sensitivity analysis should be undertaken to explore the sensitivity of the main results to different missing data assumptions. Medical journals can help to improve the situation by requiring higher standards of reporting and analytical methods to deal with missing data, and by issuing guidance to authors on expected standard.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Extra materiaal
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 12/2016

Quality of Life Research 12/2016 Naar de uitgave