Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
An earlier version of this paper was presented in April, 2010 at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Religiousness has been observed to have a beneficial relationship with blood pressure, however, specific aspects of religiousness that interact with physiological mechanisms to influence this relationship are not known. This study explored laboratory cardiovascular reactivity (blood pressure, heart rate) to psychological stress among middle aged community dwelling individuals grouped by religious motivation (Intrinsic, Pro-religious, Non-religious). Measures of personality, cynical hostility, aggression, sense of coherence, and compassion were administered. Results indicated that the Pro-religious group demonstrated dampened reactivity compared to the other research groups. However, the Pro-religious also demonstrated a less positive psychological profile (e.g., greater cynicism, aggression, and neuroticism; less compassion and sense of coherence) and poorer self-reported health compared with the Intrinsic group and behavioral observations demonstrated that the Pro-religious were unreliable in keeping appointments and appeared rushed during the experiment. These findings indicate a complicated interface between personality, coping, and religious motivation in response to stressors and emphasize the need for naturalistic and longitudinal investigations of individuals who vary in terms of religious motivation.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Allport, G. W. (1950). The individual and his religion: A psychological interpretation. New York: Macmillan.
American Heart Association. (2011). Why blood pressure matters. Retrieved March 30, 2011 from http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/HighBloodPressure/WhyBloodPressureMatters/Why-Blood-Pressure-Matters_UCM_002051_Article.jsp.
Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub.
Appelhans, B. M., & Luecken, L. J. (2006). Heart rate variability as an index of regulated emotional responding. Review of General Psychology, 10, 229–240. CrossRef
Barefoot, J. C., Dodge, K. A., Peterson, B. L., & Dahlstrom, W. G. (1989). The Cook-Medley Hostility Scale: Item content and ability to predict survival. Psychosomatic Medicine, 51, 46–57. PubMed
Bergin, A. E., Masters, K. S., & Richards, P. S. (1987). Religiousness and mental health reconsidered: A study of an intrinsically religious sample. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 197–204. CrossRef
Bernston, G. G., Norman, G. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Spirituality and autonomic cardiac control. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 198–208. CrossRef
Brady, M.J., Peterman, A.H., Finchett, G., & Cella, D. (1999). The expanded version of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy- Spiritual Well- Being Scale (FACIT- Sp- Ex): Initial report of psychometric properties. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, San Diego, CA.
Cacioppo, J. T., Malarkey, W. B., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Uchino, B. N., Sgoutas-Emch, S. A., Sheridan, J. F., et al. (1995). Heterogeneity in neuroendocrine and immune responses to brief psychological stressors as a function of autonomic cardiac activation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 57, 154–164. PubMed
Cook, W. W., & Medley, D. M. (1954). Proposed hostility and pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 414–418. CrossRef
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Neo PI-R professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Donahue, M. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 400–419. CrossRef
Edmondson, K. A., Lawler, K. A., Jobe, R. L., Younger, J. W., Piferi, R. L., & Jones, W. H. (2005). Spirituality predicts health and cardiovascular responses to stress in young adult women. Journal of Religion and Health, 44, 161–171. CrossRef
Gorsuch, R. L. (1994). Toward motivational theories of intrinsic religious commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33, 315–325. CrossRef
Gorsuch, R. L., & McPherson, S. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-Revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348–354. CrossRef
Graham, J. R. (2006). MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics 2010 Writing Group. (2010). Heart disease and stroke statistics–2010 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 121, e46–e215. CrossRef
Hood, R. W., Morris, R. J., & Watson, P. J. (1990). Quasi-experimental elicitation of the differential report of religious experience among intrinsic and indiscriminately pro-religious types. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 164–172. CrossRef
James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. New York: Random House. CrossRef
Larkin, K. T., Semenchuk, E. M., Frazer, N. L., Suchday, S., & Taylor, R. L. (1998). Cardiovascular and behavioral response to social confrontation: Measuring real-life stress in the laboratory. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 294–301. PubMed
Lawler, K. A., & Younger, J. W. (2002). Theobiology: An analysis of spirituality, cardiovascular responses, stress, mood, and physical health. Journal of Religion and Health, 41, 347–362. CrossRef
Masters, K. S. (in press). Religion, spirituality, and cardiovascular disease. In S. Waldstein, K. Kaatzel, & W. Kop (Eds.). Handbook of cardiovascular behavioral medicine. Springer: New York.
Masters, K. S., & Bergin, A. E. (1992). Religious orientation and mental health. In J. F. Schumaker (Ed.), Religion and mental health (pp. 221–232). London: Oxford University Press.
Masters, K. S., Ives, D. E., & Shearer, D. S. (1997). Religious orientation as a mediator of hostility. Paper presented at the 105th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
Masters, K. S., & Knestel, A. (2011). Religious orientation among a random sample of community-dwelling adults: Relations with health status and health-relevant behaviors. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21, 63–76. CrossRef
McEwen, B. S. (2007). Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: Central role of the brain. Physiological Review, 87, 873–904. CrossRef
Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776–783. CrossRef
Pew Research Center. (2008). US religious landscape survey: The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life; 2008. Retrieved December 23, 2008 from http://religions.pewforum.org/.
Richards, P. S. (1991). Religious devoutness in college students: Relations with emotional adjustment and psychological separation from parents. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 189–196. CrossRef
Saroglou, V., & Fiasse, L. (2003). Birth order, personality, and religion: A study among young adults from a three-sibling family. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 19–29. CrossRef
Saroglou, V., & Muñoz-García, A. (2008). Individual differences in religion and spirituality: An issue of personality traits and/or values. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47, 83–101. CrossRef
Smith, T. W., & O’Keefe, J. L. (1988). Cross-situational consistency of cardiovascular reactivity. Biological Pathways, 27, 237–243.
Treiber, F. A., Kamarck, T., Schneiderman, N., Sheffield, D., Kapuku, G., & Taylor, T. (2003). Cardiovascular reactivity and development of preclinical and clinical disease states. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 46–62. PubMed
Turner-Musa, J. O., & Wilson, S. A. (2006). Religious orientation and social support on health- promoting behaviors of African American college students. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 105–115. CrossRef
Williams, R. (1989). The trusting heart. New York: Times Books.
- Religious motivation and cardiovascular reactivity among middle aged adults: is being pro-religious really that good for you?
Kevin S. Masters
- Springer US