Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
We aimed to evaluate the measurement properties of the Singapore English and Chinese versions of the Short-Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2) Questionnaire, an improved version of the widely used SF-36, for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a multi-ethnic urban Asian population in Singapore.
SF-36v2 scores and data on medical history, demographic and lifestyle factors from the Singapore Prospective Study Programme were analyzed. Convergent and divergent validity, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, known group validity and factor structure of the SF-36v2 were assessed for the English and Chinese versions, respectively.
Complete data for 4,917 participants (45.8 %) out of 10,747 eligible individuals were analyzed (survey language: 4,115 English and 802 Chinese). Item-scale correlations exceeded 0.4 for all items of the English SF-36v2 and for all except one item of the Chinese SF-36v2 (bathe and dress: item-scale correlation: 0.36). In the English SF-36v2, Cronbach’s alpha exceeded 0.70 for all scales. In the Chinese SF-36v2, Cronbach’s alpha exceeded 0.7 on all scales except social functioning (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.68). For known groups validity, respondents with chronic medical conditions expectedly reported lower SF-36v2 score on most English and Chinese SF-36v2 scales. In confirmatory factor analysis, the Singapore three-component model was favored over the United States two-component and Japan three-component models.
The English and Chinese SF-36v2 are valid and reliable for assessing HRQoL among English and Chinese-speaking Singaporeans. Test–retest reliability and responsiveness of the English and Chinese SF-36v2 in Singapore remain to be evaluated.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Wee, H. L., Wu, Y., Thumboo, J., Lee, J., & Tai, E. S. (2010). Association of body mass index with Short-Form 36 physical and mental component summary scores in a multiethnic Asian population. International Journal of Obesity (London), 34(6), 1034–1043. CrossRef
Ware, J. E,. Jr. (2000). SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25(24), 3130–3139. CrossRef
Ware, J., Kosinki, M., Bjorner, J., Turner-Bowker, D., Gandek, B., & Maruish, M. (2007). User’s manual for the SF-36v2 health survey (2nd ed.). Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated.
Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2007). Quality of life: the assessment, analysis, and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Huang, I. C., Frangakis, C. & Wu, A. (2004). Are there different components for the Taiwan SF-36 compared to western versions: Physical, mental and social? In International society for quality of life 11th annual conference (vol. 13, p. 1495). Quality of Life Research, Hong Kong.
- Reliability and validity of the English (Singapore) and Chinese (Singapore) versions of the Short-Form 36 version 2 in a multi-ethnic Urban Asian population in Singapore
- Springer Netherlands