Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-03-2013 | Original Paper | Uitgave 3/2013

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 3/2013

Reliability and Validity of Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised, Japanese Version

Tijdschrift:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > Uitgave 3/2013
Auteurs:
Kenji J. Tsuchiya, Kaori Matsumoto, Atsuko Yagi, Naoko Inada, Miho Kuroda, Eiko Inokuchi, Tomonori Koyama, Yoko Kamio, Masatsugu Tsujii, Saeko Sakai, Ikuko Mohri, Masako Taniike, Ryoichiro Iwanaga, Kei Ogasahara, Taishi Miyachi, Shunji Nakajima, Iori Tani, Masafumi Ohnishi, Masahiko Inoue, Kazuyo Nomura, Taku Hagiwara, Tokio Uchiyama, Hironobu Ichikawa, Shuji Kobayashi, Ken Miyamoto, Kazuhiko Nakamura, Katsuaki Suzuki, Norio Mori, Nori Takei
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s10803-012-1606-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

To examine the inter-rater reliability of Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised, Japanese Version (ADI-R-JV), the authors recruited 51 individuals aged 3–19 years, interviewed by two independent raters. Subsequently, to assess the discriminant and diagnostic validity of ADI-R-JV, the authors investigated 317 individuals aged 2–19 years, who were divided into three diagnostic groups as follows: autistic disorder (AD), pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified, and other psychiatric diagnosis or no diagnosis, according to the consensus clinical diagnosis. As regards inter-rater reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients of greater than 0.80 were obtained for all three domains of ADI-R-JV. As regards discriminant validity, the mean scores of the three domains was significantly higher in individuals with AD than in those of other diagnostic groups. As regards diagnostic validity, sensitivity and specificity for correctly diagnosing AD were 0.92 and 0.89, respectively, but sensitivity was 0.55 for individuals younger than 5 years. Specificity was consistently high regardless of age and intelligence. ADI-R-JV was shown to be a reliable tool, and has sufficient discriminant validity and satisfactory diagnostic validity for correctly diagnosing AD, although the diagnostic validity appeared to be compromised with respect to the diagnosis of younger individuals.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Extra materiaal
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 152 kb)
10803_2012_1606_MOESM1_ESM.doc
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2013

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 3/2013 Naar de uitgave