TODO: Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

01-03-2013 | Original Paper

Reliability and Validity of Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised, Japanese Version

Auteurs: Kenji J. Tsuchiya, Kaori Matsumoto, Atsuko Yagi, Naoko Inada, Miho Kuroda, Eiko Inokuchi, Tomonori Koyama, Yoko Kamio, Masatsugu Tsujii, Saeko Sakai, Ikuko Mohri, Masako Taniike, Ryoichiro Iwanaga, Kei Ogasahara, Taishi Miyachi, Shunji Nakajima, Iori Tani, Masafumi Ohnishi, Masahiko Inoue, Kazuyo Nomura, Taku Hagiwara, Tokio Uchiyama, Hironobu Ichikawa, Shuji Kobayashi, Ken Miyamoto, Kazuhiko Nakamura, Katsuaki Suzuki, Norio Mori, Nori Takei

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 3/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

To examine the inter-rater reliability of Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised, Japanese Version (ADI-R-JV), the authors recruited 51 individuals aged 3–19 years, interviewed by two independent raters. Subsequently, to assess the discriminant and diagnostic validity of ADI-R-JV, the authors investigated 317 individuals aged 2–19 years, who were divided into three diagnostic groups as follows: autistic disorder (AD), pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified, and other psychiatric diagnosis or no diagnosis, according to the consensus clinical diagnosis. As regards inter-rater reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients of greater than 0.80 were obtained for all three domains of ADI-R-JV. As regards discriminant validity, the mean scores of the three domains was significantly higher in individuals with AD than in those of other diagnostic groups. As regards diagnostic validity, sensitivity and specificity for correctly diagnosing AD were 0.92 and 0.89, respectively, but sensitivity was 0.55 for individuals younger than 5 years. Specificity was consistently high regardless of age and intelligence. ADI-R-JV was shown to be a reliable tool, and has sufficient discriminant validity and satisfactory diagnostic validity for correctly diagnosing AD, although the diagnostic validity appeared to be compromised with respect to the diagnosis of younger individuals.
Bijlagen
Deze inhoud is alleen zichtbaar als je bent ingelogd en de juiste rechten hebt.
Literatuur
Deze inhoud is alleen zichtbaar als je bent ingelogd en de juiste rechten hebt.
Metagegevens
Titel
Reliability and Validity of Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised, Japanese Version
Auteurs
Kenji J. Tsuchiya
Kaori Matsumoto
Atsuko Yagi
Naoko Inada
Miho Kuroda
Eiko Inokuchi
Tomonori Koyama
Yoko Kamio
Masatsugu Tsujii
Saeko Sakai
Ikuko Mohri
Masako Taniike
Ryoichiro Iwanaga
Kei Ogasahara
Taishi Miyachi
Shunji Nakajima
Iori Tani
Masafumi Ohnishi
Masahiko Inoue
Kazuyo Nomura
Taku Hagiwara
Tokio Uchiyama
Hironobu Ichikawa
Shuji Kobayashi
Ken Miyamoto
Kazuhiko Nakamura
Katsuaki Suzuki
Norio Mori
Nori Takei
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1606-9