Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Kaiser Permanente or the University of Arizona.
Examination of reliability and validity of a specialized health-related quality of life questionnaire for rectal cancer (RC) survivors (≥5 years post-diagnosis).
We mailed 1,063 Kaiser Permanente (KP) RC survivors (313 ostomy and 750 anastomosis) a questionnaire containing the Modified City of Hope Quality of Life-Ostomy (mCOH-QOL-O), SF-12v2, Duke–UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire (FSSQ), and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Index (BFI). We adapted certain BFI items for use by subjects with intestinal ostomies. We evaluated reliability for all instruments with inter-item correlations and Cronbach’s alpha. We assessed construct validity only for the BFI in the ostomy group, because such use has not been reported.
The overall response rate was 60.5 % (577 respondents/953 eligible). Compared with non-responders, participants were on average 2 years younger and more likely non-Hispanic white, resided in educationally non-deprived areas, and had KP membership through a group. The mCOH-QOL-O, SF-12, and FSSQ were found to be highly reliable for RC survivors. In the ostomy group, BFI Urgency/Soilage and Dietary subscales were found to be reliable, but Frequency was not. Factor analysis supported the construct of Urgency/Soilage and Dietary subscales in the ostomy group, although one item had a moderate correlation with all three factors. The BFI also demonstrated good concurrent validity with other instruments in the ostomy group.
With possible exception of the BFI Frequency subscale in populations with ostomies, components of our survey can be used for the entire population of RC survivors, no matter whether they received anastomosis or ostomy.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Institute of Medicine. (2007). Implementing cancer survivorship care planning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Altschuler, A., Ramirez, M., Grant, M., Wendel, C., Hornbrook, M. C., Herrinton, L., et al. (2009). The influence of husbands’ or male partners’ support on women’s psychosocial adjustment to having an ostomy resulting from colorectal cancer. Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 36(3), 299–305. CrossRef
Mohler, M. J., Coons, S. J., Hornbrook, M. C., Herrinton, L. J., Wendel, C. S., Grant, M., et al. (2008). The health-related quality of life in long-term colorectal cancer survivors study: Objectives, methods and patient sample. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 24(7), 2059–2070. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Mols, F., Beijers, T., Lemmens, V., van den Hurk, C. J., Vreugdenhil, G., & van de Poll-Franse, L. V. (2013). Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy and its association with quality of life among 2- to 11-year colorectal cancer survivors: Results from the population-based PROFILES registry. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(21), 2699–2707. PubMedCrossRef
Pittman, J., Rawl, S. M., Schmidt, C. M., Grant, M., Ko, C. Y., Wendel, C., et al. (2008). Demographic and clinical factors related to ostomy complications and quality of life in veterans with an ostomy. Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 35(5), 493–503. CrossRef
Neuman, H. B., Schrag, D., Cabral, C., Weiser, M. R., Paty, P. B., Guillem, J. G., et al. (2007). Can differences in bowel function after surgery for rectal cancer be identified by the European Organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life instrument? Annals of Surgical Oncology, 14(5), 1727–1734. PubMedCrossRef
Morrison, D. F. (2004). Multivariate statistical methods (4th ed.). Independence, KY: Cengage Learning.
- Reliability and validity of a survey to measure bowel function and quality of life in long-term rectal cancer survivors
Christopher S. Wendel
Larissa K. F. Temple
Mark C. Hornbrook
Carmit K. McMullen
Joanna E. Bulkley
Robert S. Krouse
- Springer International Publishing