Relationship Between Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Parent Stress, Anxiety, Depression, Quality of Life and Social Support

GI symptoms are linked to reduced quality of life in children and adolescents with ASD, as well as sensory issues, challenging behavior, comorbid psychopathology, and sleep problems (Leader et al., 2022a, 2022b, 2022c, 2022d, 2022e). Therefore, GI symptoms exacerbate other behavioral issues and there is a link between GI symptoms and other increased symptoms. The relationship between GI symptoms and challenging behavior is one that has been explored in previous research (Leader et al., 2022a, 2022b, 2022c, 2022d, 2022e; Restrepo et al., 2020).

Similarly, the relationship between challenging behavior and parental stress has been explored in previous research (Higgins et al., 2023; McStay et al., 2014a). A relationship has been established between GI symptoms and challenging behavior. Previous research has indicated that there is a relationship between challenging behavior and parental stress (Lanyi et al., 2022). The potential relationship between GI symptoms and parental stress needs to be investigated. One could hypothesise that an increase in GI symptoms would lead to an increase in parental stress. While other researchers examined the relationship between parental stress and challenging behavior in parents of children and adolescents with ASD, often other variables such as GI symptoms, are often not considered.

Research has examined the effects of stress in parents of children with ASD (Foody et al., 2014; Iwamoto et al., 2023) and has examined the differences between fathers and mothers of children with ASD (Foody et al., 2015). While we know that higher levels of stress are prevalent in parents of children and adolescents with ASD, very little is known about the impact GI symptoms have on parental stress.

Silva and Schalock (2012) investigated stress in parents of children with autism, under the age of six. The research examined the core symptoms of autism, the comorbid behavioral symptoms, and the comorbid physical symptoms. The researchers investigated bowel problems, including constipation and diarrhea as a comorbid physical condition. Bowel problems were found to be stressful for 31.8% of parents of children with ASD, compared to 5% of parents of typically developing children and 17.9% of parents of children with other developmental disabilities. Parents of children with ASD who exhibited bowel problems differed significantly from parents of typically developing children in parenting stress levels. However, no significant differences were found between parents of children with ASD and parents of children with other developmental disabilities for bowel problems. It was found that 9.3% of parents of children with autism endorsed bowel problems as “Very stressful on a daily basis” while 5.6% of parents endorsed these problems as “So stressful sometimes we feel we can’t cope”.

Toileting training issues were also found to be a stressor for parents. Silva and Schalock (2012) found potty training to be stressful for 50.5% of parents of children with autism, compared to 8.6% of parents of typically developing children. It was found that 24.3% of parents of children with autism endorsed bowel problems as “Very stressful on a daily basis” while 11.2% of parents endorsed these problems as “So stressful sometimes we feel we can’t cope”.

Anxiety and depression are important areas of study in parents of children and adolescents with ASD (McIntyre et al., 2023; Roubinov et al., 2023). Foody et al. (2015) reported that mothers of children with ASD reported higher levels of parental distress, anxiety, and depression than fathers. This is supported by Ozturk et al. (2014) who found that mothers of children with ASD reported higher levels of depression than fathers of children with ASD. Ozturk et al. (2014) found a relationship between parental distress and parental depression. Pozo and Sarriá (2015) investigated stress, anxiety, depression, and well-being in three groups; parents of adults with ASD, parents of adolescents with ASD, and parents of young children with ASD. It was found that depression and anxiety were lower in parents of adults and adolescents with ASD, compared to parents of young children with ASD.

Falk et al. (2014) investigated parental predictors of stress, anxiety, and depression in parents of children with ASD. Anxiety was predicted by maternal age, and the mother’s perceived ability to set behavioral limits. Depression was predicted by child’s aggressive behavior, a perceived lack of social support, and an externalized parental locus of control. Kuhlthau et al. (2014) found that 40% of parents of children with ASD reported having clinical depression symptoms. The authors found that married parents reported lower depression symptoms than parents who were not married. Kuhlthau et al. (2014) also found that parents who had two or more children with special health care needs had more clinical depression symptoms than parents who had one child with special health care needs. It was found that 51% of parents of children with ASD reported moderate or severe problems with anxiety or depression. Foody et al. (2014) found that 19% of parents of children with ASD had anxiety scores in the severe range. The authors found that increased number of unmet service needs predicted higher maternal depression.

Recent research has focused on quality of life in parents of children with ASD (Adams et al., 2020; Davy et al., 2023). Kuhlthau et al. (2014) investigated health-related quality of life in parents of children with ASD. Health; especially stress and mental health, of parents of children with ASD was found to be lower than normative populations. Focus groups were also conducted and it was found that parental health-related quality of life was negatively influenced by their child’s ASD. Parents mentioned that stress was caused by the child’s behavioral problems. In parents of children with ASD, McStay et al. (2014c) found that child behavior problems were associated with father’s perceptions of family quality of life. The authors commented that more parents may stay at home due to their child behavior problems, and “their satisfaction with their quality of life may decrease due to being unable to actively engage in the community” (McStay et al., 2014c, p. 3111).

McStay et al. (2014b) examined maternal stress and quality of life in parents of children with autism from preschool age to adolescence. It was reported that 17.6% of mothers of preschool children, 41% of mothers of early school age children, 17.9% of mothers of middle school age children, and 37% of mothers of early high school age children reported high satisfaction with their family quality of life. It was found that high levels of satisfaction fluctuated between the different age groups. Mothers of early school age children and adolescents reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction with their family quality of life than mothers of preschool and middle school age children.

Research has been conducted on the relationship between perceived social support and a number of variables, including posttraumatic growth (Feng et al., 2022), subjective well-being (Bi et al., 2022), parental stress (McGrew & Keyes, 2014), anxiety and depression, and quality of life (Hsiao, 2016). Very little is known about the possible relationship between perceived parental social support and whether a child presents with GI symptoms or not. It may be hypothesised that parents of children with GI symptoms may be less likely to seek access to supportive opportunities, such as in-person parent groups. Parents may also be less likely to engage in leisure and community participation activities which could be a supportive opportunity for them. Certain GI symptoms may be very difficult for parents, such as when a child is experiencing abdominal pain or other physical symptoms such as diarrhea and constipation. These GI symptoms can limit access to supportive opportunities for parents. This may lead parents to avoid unnecessary journeys outside the child’s home and school environments, and therefore a parent may have less access to social support. This hypothesis is supported by Davy et al. (2023) who indicated that there are barriers to participation in meaningful activities for parents of children with ASD. However, as so little is known about GI symptoms and perceived social support, the current study aims to explore this relationship further.

The current study aims to explore the relationship between child GI symptoms and parental well-being. The relationship between GI symptoms and parental stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, and social support will be examined. The aim of the study is to provide data on how GI symptoms affect the well-being of parents of children and adolescents with ASD.

The Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-4-SF; Abidin, 2012) identifies parent–child problem areas in parents. It contains 36 items, and is divided into three domains; Parenting Distress (PD), Parent–Child Dysfunction Interaction (P-CDI), and Difficult Child (DC). These domains combine to form a Total Stress score. It is rated on a five-point Likert scale from 1(Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree). Coefficient alphas for each PSI-4-SF are all above 0.90. The psychometric characteristics of the PSI-4-SF have been examined (Reitman et al., 2002).

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983) is used to assess anxiety and depression. It contains 14 items, and has two subscales; Anxiety and Depression. Responses are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Very Often Indeed). A score of 0–7 is classified as normal for each score, 8–10 is classified as borderline abnormal (borderline case) and 11–21 is classified as abnormal. Bjelland et al. (2002) reviewed the validity of the HADS. Cronbach’s alpha was found to be 0.68 to 0.93 (mean = 0.83) for the Anxiety subscale, while it was from 0.67 to 0.90 (mean = 0.82) for the Depression subscale. Correlation between the HADS and other commonly used questionnaires were in the range 0.49 to 0.83.

The World Health Organization’s Quality of Life Questionnaire-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF; The WHOQOL Group, 1998) was used to assess parent quality of life. It is a shorter version of the original instrument, the WHOQOL-100. It contains 26 items and has a number of different domains including physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. Items are scored on a five-point scale. The WHOQOL Group (1998) found that the WHOQOL-BREF correlated highly with the domains of the original WHOQOL-100. WHOQOL-BREF domain scores demonstrated good discriminant validity, content validity, internal consistency, and test–retest reliability. The WHOQOL-BREF has been used with parents of children with intellectual disabilities (Lin et al., 2009). It has recently been validated for use with parents of children with ASD (Dardas & Ahmad, 2014).

The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS; Zimet et al., 1988) was used to assess perceived social support. It contains 12 items. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1(Very Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Very Strongly Agree). The items are divided into factor groups relating to the source of social support, which are Family, Friends or Significant Other. High internal consistency has been demonstrated (Canty-Mitchell & Zimet, 2000). Good internal reliability and strong factorial validity has been demonstrated (Zimet et al., 1990).

The Gastrointestinal Symptom Inventory (Autism Treatment Network, 2005) is a 35-item questionnaire that was developed in the early days of the Autism Treatment Network (ATN). There are also additional items should a participant exhibit certain symptomatology, and therefore includes 77 items in total. The ATN is the first network of hospitals and physicians dedicated to developing a model of comprehensive medical care for children and adolescents with autism through seventeen participating institutions in the U.S. and Canada. It was based on previous questionnaires and on clinical symptom assessment for children with autism and identified gastrointestinal disorders. The inventory is scored initially dichotomously i.e. whether or not the child has any gastrointestinal symptoms. The inventory also allows branching into specific areas of symptomatology: abdominal pain, abnormal bowel movements, reflux, and food insensitivity. These branches will allow determination of rates of these categories as well. This tool has not been validated. However, a brief version of the scale has been developed, the GI Signs and Symptoms Inventory (GISSI-17; Margolis et al., 2019) and was used in published research (Bresciani et al., 2023). The original Gastrointestinal Symptom Inventory has been used in a number of published research studies (Leader et al., 2020; Leader et al., 2021a; Leader et al., 2022a, 2022b, 2022c, 2022d, 2022e; Leader et al., 2022d; Leader et al., 2022e; Leader et al., 2021b; Mazefsky et al., 2014; Mazurek et al., 2013).

On the PSI-SF, it was found that 2.2% (n = 9) of parents engaged in defensive responding. Defensive responding was significant if a participant scored a sum of 10 or less on a selected number of items of the PSI-SF. A summary of the PSI-SF subscale means, standard deviations, cut-offs across participants, and results of the t-tests are shown in Table 2. It was found that parents of children with GI symptoms scored significantly higher on the subscale Difficult Child (m = 40.63) than parents of children without GI symptoms (m = 36.93).

A summary of the HADS subscale means, standard deviations, cut-offs across participants, and results of the MANOVA are displayed in Table 3.

It was found that 22% (n = 88) of participants rated their quality of life as very good, while 51% (n = 204) rated it as good. It was found that 19% (n = 76) considered their quality of life neither good nor poor, while 7.5% (n = 30) considered it to be poor, and 0.5% (n = 2) considered it to be very poor. It was reported that 13.3% (n = 53) were very satisfied with their health, 43% (n = 172) were satisfied, and 18.8% (n = 75) were neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. It was found that 20.5% (n = 82) were dissatisfied and 4.5% (n = 18) were very dissatisfied with their health. A summary of the WHOQOL-BREF domain means, standard deviation, and results of the MANOVA can be found in Table 4. It was found that parents of children and adolescents with GI symptoms had significantly lower scores on the domain of Social Relationships in the WHOQOL-BREF (m = 52.68) than parents of children and adolescents without GI symptoms (m = 63.65). Lower scores were found in the WHOQOL-BREF domain of Environment for parents of children with GI symptoms (m = 62.45) than parents of children without GI symptoms (m = 69.57).

A summary of the MSPSS means, standard deviations and results of the t-test are shown in Table 5. A significant difference was found between parents of children with and without GI symptoms on their perceived social support, t (406) = − 4.21, p = 0.016. Parents of children with GI symptoms had lower scores of perceived social support (m = 53.69), compared to parents of children without GI symptoms (m = 60.57). Specifically, there was a significant difference between parents of children with and without constipation on their perceived social support, t (374) = − 3.53, p = 0.000, with parents of children with constipation presented with lower scores of perceived social support (m = 52.20), compared to parents of children without constipation (m = 59.24).